Astigmatism
Conditions
Brief summary
Prospective study to evaluate the clinical performance of fanfilcon A toric contact lens and senofilcon A toric contact lens after two weeks of wear.
Detailed description
The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the clinical performance of Avaira Vitality toric and ACUVUE OASYS® for ASTIGMATISM contact lenses after 2-weeks of wear in each pair.
Interventions
contact lens
contact lens
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Double masked (participant and investigator)
Intervention model description
Prospective, randomized, double masked, bilateral, 2-weeks, crossover study.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive) * Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years * Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer * Has a contact lens spherical prescription between +6.00 to - 9.00 (inclusive) * Have no less than -0.75D of astigmatism and no more than -2.25 D in both eyes. * Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye. * Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses. * Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease * Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter. * Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses. * Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, \> 8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so). * Is willing to comply with the visit schedule
Exclusion criteria
* Has a CL prescription outside the range of the available parameters of the study lenses. * Has a spectacle cylinder less than -0.75D or more than -2.50 D of cylinder in either eye. * Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL wear (5 days per week; \> 8 hours/day) * Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye. * Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities * Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear. * Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as: * Pathological dry eye or associated findings * Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis * Neovascularization \> 0.75 mm in from of the limbus * Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1 * Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present) * Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis * History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections * Poor personal hygiene * Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity) * Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea. * Has Presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses. * Has undergone corneal refractive surgery. * Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Centration | Baseline | Centration of lens on eye (Optimum, Decentration acceptable, Decentration unacceptable) |
| Corneal Coverage | Baseline | Lens covering the cornea (Yes, No) |
| Post Blink Movement | Baseline | Amount of lens movement after blink (0-5 Likert Scale, 0=Insufficient, 2=Optimal, 4=Excessive movement) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Wearing Time | 2 weeks | Average daily wearing time (hours/day) |
| Comfortable Wearing Time | 2 weeks | Comfortable daily wearing time (hours/day) |
Countries
Mexico
Participant flow
Recruitment details
45 habitual lens wearers were enrolled. 1 participant was ineligible for the study due to an unacceptable lens fit. 44 participants were dispensed and completed all study visits.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Overall Study All subjects are randomized to 2-week cross-over study to compare fanfilcon A and senofilcon A. | 44 |
| Total | 44 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Overall Study | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | — |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | — |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 44 Participants | — |
| Age, Continuous | 25 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 44 participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 30 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 44 | 0 / 44 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 44 | 0 / 44 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 44 | 0 / 44 |
Outcome results
Corneal Coverage
Lens covering the cornea (Yes, No)
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanfilcon A | Corneal Coverage | Yes | 44 Participants |
| Fanfilcon A | Corneal Coverage | No | 0 Participants |
| Senofilcon A | Corneal Coverage | No | 0 Participants |
| Senofilcon A | Corneal Coverage | Yes | 44 Participants |
Corneal Coverage
Lens covering the cornea (Yes, No)
Time frame: 2 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanfilcon A | Corneal Coverage | Yes | 44 Participants |
| Fanfilcon A | Corneal Coverage | No | 0 Participants |
| Senofilcon A | Corneal Coverage | Yes | 44 Participants |
| Senofilcon A | Corneal Coverage | No | 0 Participants |
Lens Centration
Centration of lens on eye (Optimum, Decentration acceptable, Decentration unacceptable)
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Fanfilcon A | Lens Centration | 44 Participants |
| Senofilcon A | Lens Centration | 44 Participants |
Lens Centration
Centration of lens on eye (Optimum, Decentration acceptable, Decentration unacceptable)
Time frame: 2 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanfilcon A | Lens Centration | Optimal Centration | 44 Participants |
| Fanfilcon A | Lens Centration | Decentration Acceptable | 0 Participants |
| Fanfilcon A | Lens Centration | Decentration unacceptable | 0 Participants |
| Senofilcon A | Lens Centration | Optimal Centration | 44 Participants |
| Senofilcon A | Lens Centration | Decentration Acceptable | 0 Participants |
| Senofilcon A | Lens Centration | Decentration unacceptable | 0 Participants |
Post Blink Movement
Amount of lens movement after blink (0-5 Likert Scale, 0=Insufficient, 2=Optimal, 4=Excessive movement)
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanfilcon A | Post Blink Movement | 1.91 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Senofilcon A | Post Blink Movement | 1.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
Post Blink Movement
Amount of lens movement after blink (0-5 Likert Scale, 0=Insufficient, 2=Optimal, 4=Excessive movement)
Time frame: 2 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanfilcon A | Post Blink Movement | 2.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Senofilcon A | Post Blink Movement | 2.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
Comfortable Wearing Time
Comfortable daily wearing time (hours/day)
Time frame: 2 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanfilcon A | Comfortable Wearing Time | 10.0 hours/day | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Senofilcon A | Comfortable Wearing Time | 9.0 hours/day | Standard Deviation 3 |
Wearing Time
Average daily wearing time (hours/day)
Time frame: 2 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanfilcon A | Wearing Time | 12.2 hours/day | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Senofilcon A | Wearing Time | 11.6 hours/day | Standard Deviation 3.1 |