Skip to content

Comparison of Platelet Rich Fibrin as Graft & Membrane Vs Hyaluronic Acid & Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Interradicular Defects

Efficacy of Platelet Rich Fibrin as a Graft and Membrane Versus Hyaluronic Acid and Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Mandibular Grade II and Grade III Furcation Defects- A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03578744
Acronym
CPRFGMHATID
Enrollment
14
Registered
2018-07-06
Start date
2017-11-16
Completion date
2018-10-30
Last updated
2018-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Furcation Defects

Brief summary

This study is intended to compare the efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin as a graft and a membrane versus hyaluronic acid(Gengigel) and amniotic membrane in the treatment of mandibular grade II furcation defects.

Detailed description

Platelet-rich fibrin is a fraction of plasma that provides a rich source of growth factors and may enhance the stabilization and revascularization of the flaps and grafts. Hyaluronic acid is a naturally occurring non-sulfated high molecular weight glycosaminoglycan that forms a critical component of the extracellular matrix and contributes significantly to tissue hydrodynamics, cell migration and proliferation. Hence its administration to periodontal wound sites could achieve beneficial effects in periodontal tissue regeneration. Amniotic membrane is being used for various regenerative procedures as it is a rich source of various collagen and non-collagen proteins such as laminin, fibronectin and proteoglycan.

Interventions

After administering local anaesthetic a full thickness flap will be raised and reflected to expose the furcation defects. The furcation defects would then be debrided and the graft and membrane secured in position. Later the flap would be sutured back.

Sponsors

Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences & Research Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Sealed envelopes.

Intervention model description

Patients will be equally divided into two test groups, Group A and Group B after phase I therapy. The group A patients will be treated with conventional flap surgery and the furcation would be debrided, following which platelet-rich fibrin will be placed as a graft and a membrane. The flap will then be sutured back. The group B patients will also be treated with conventional flap surgery after furcation area is debrided, and hyaluronic acid (gengigel)will be placed as a graft over which amniotic membrane will be placed. The flap would then be sutured.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Grade II furcation involvement

Exclusion criteria

* Smokers, * Pregnant and lactating women, * Systemically compromised patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiological ParametersBaseline and 9 months post surgery.Amount of Bone fill in the furcation (Change in Bone level) to be measured by Cone Beam Computed Tomography(CBCT)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical ParameterBaseline and 9 months post surgery.Change in relative vertical clinical attachment level will be measured by Williams probe in millimeters in the furcation area.

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026