Skip to content

Prospective Comparison of Metolazone Versus Chlorothiazide for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Diuretic Resistance

Prospective Comparison of Metolazone Versus Chlorothiazide for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Diuretic Resistance

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03574857
Enrollment
5
Registered
2018-07-02
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
2021-01-01
Last updated
2021-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Failure, Heart Failure Acute, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Keywords

Loop diuretics, Heart failure, Diuretic resistance, Thiazide diuretics

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to compare efficacy of metolazone and chlorothiazide as add-on therapy in patients refractory to loop diuretics with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This will be a single-center randomized pilot study.

Interventions

DRUGMetolazone Oral Tablet

Day 1: Metolazone 5 mg PO Day 2: Metolazone 5 mg PO

DRUGChlorothiazide Injection

Day 1: Chlorothiazide 500 mg IV Day 2: Chlorothiazide 500 mg IV

Sponsors

University of Virginia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 years old * Admitted for acute decompensated HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<40% * Refractory fluid overload: * Unresponsive (\<500 mL net negative over previous 24 hours) AND ineffective diuresis (determined by HF team) to moderate intensity push or low intensity continuous infusion loop diuretic (80 mg IV furosemide or equivalent bumetanide dose of 4 mg) * English or Spanish-speaking subjects * Willing and able to comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Baseline thiazide use prior to admission or prior to study enrollment * Renal replacement therapies (RRT) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \<30 mL/min at the time of enrollment * Pregnant women * Cognitive impairment * Prisoners * Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) or temporary mechanical circulatory support devices * History of cardiac transplant * Reported allergy to thiazides * No enteral access or unable to take medications enterally * Palliative diuretics * Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90 mm Hg prior to randomization * Patients receiving concomitant lithium therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Net urine output at 24 hours24 hoursMilliliters of urine output minus the oral plus intravenous intake

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Net urine output at 48 hours48 hoursMilliliters of urine output minus the oral plus IV intake
Net fluid balance over 12 hours24 hoursthe net fluid balance over 12 and 24 hours prior to the addition of metolazone or chlorothiazide compared to the 12 hours after addition of the study drug
Net fluid balance over 24 hours48 hoursNet fluid balance over 24 hours prior to the addition of metolazone or chlorothiazide compared to the 24 hours after addition of the study drug
Weight change48 hoursChange in documented weight in kg at 48 hours after starting metolazone or chlorothiazide

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electrolyte disturbances48 hoursFrequency of hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia
Worsening renal function48 hoursincrease in serum creatinine greater that 0.5 mg/dL from the patient's baseline value on the day of the first dose of chlorothiazide or metolazone
Hospital length of stayAssessed until hospital discharge, an average of 7 daysNumber of days hospitalized
ICU length of stayAssessed until hospital discharge, an average of 7 daysNumber of days patient is located in an ICU
In-hospital mortalityAssessed until hospital discharge, an average of 7 daysIncidence of in-hospital mortality

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026