Skip to content

Therapies for Recovery of Hand Function After Stroke

Contralaterally Controlled FES Versus Cyclic NMES for Hand Function After Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03574623
Enrollment
132
Registered
2018-07-02
Start date
2019-02-15
Completion date
2024-10-16
Last updated
2026-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegia, Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis

Keywords

stroke, rehabilitation, therapy, electrical stimulation, hand

Brief summary

After a stroke, it is very common to lose the ability to open the affected hand. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of three different therapies on recovery of hand function after stroke and determine if any one is better than the other.

Detailed description

A single-blinded randomized controlled trial will be carried out to assess and compare the effects of 12 weeks of Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation (CCFES), Cyclic Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (cNMES), and Task Oriented Training. Dexterity, upper limb impairment, and activity limitation will be assessed at 0 (baseline), 12 (end of treatment), and 36 weeks. The treatment dose will be the same for all three groups: 10 sessions per week of self-administered treatment at home plus 2 sessions per week of group-specific occupational therapy in the lab.

Interventions

An electrical stimulator will be used to deliver electrical current through surface electrodes to produce hand opening by making the paretic finger and thumb extensor muscles contract. The stimulator can be programmed to turn on and off in a repetitive cyclic fashion (i.e., cNMES) or be programmed to deliver stimulation with an intensity that corresponds to the opening of a glove instrumented with sensors and plugged into the stimulator (i.e., CCFES).

BEHAVIORALOccupational Therapy

Task practice that requires movement and use of the paretic hand under the guidance of a trained therapist.

Sponsors

MetroHealth Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
Kessler Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
The Cleveland Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
CollaboratorOTHER
Emory University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 6 to 24 months since a first clinical cortical or subcortical, hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic stroke * unilateral upper limb hemiparesis with finger extensor strength of grade no more than 4 out of 5 on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale * score of at least 1 and no more than 11 out of 14 on the hand section of the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment * adequate active movement of the shoulder and elbow to position the hand in the workspace for table-top task practice (necessary for the lab task practice sessions) * able to follow 3-stage commands * able to recall at least 2 of a list of 3 items after 30 minutes * skin intact on the hemiparetic arm * surface stimulation of the paretic finger and thumb extensors produces functional hand opening without pain (this will exclude those who have too much flexor spasticity) * able to hear and respond to cues from stimulator * not receiving occupational therapy (no concomitant OT) * full voluntary opening/closing of the contralateral (less affected) hand * demonstrates ability to follow instructions for operating the stimulator or have a caregiver who will assist them

Exclusion criteria

* co-existing neurologic diagnosis of peripheral nerve injury, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, or multiple sclerosis * uncontrolled seizure disorder * brainstem stroke * uncompensated hemineglect * severe shoulder or hand pain * insensate forearm or hand * history of potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmias with hemodynamic instability * implanted electronic systems (e.g. pacemaker) * botulinum toxin injections to any upper extremity muscle within 3 months of enrolling * pregnant women due to unknown risks of surface NMES during pregnancy * lack of functional passive range of motion of the wrist or fingers of affected side * diagnosis (apart from stroke) that substantially affects paretic arm and hand function * deficits in communication that interfere with reasonable study participation * lacking sufficient visual acuity to see the stimulator's display * concurrent enrollment in another investigational study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Box and Blocks Test (BBT) at 6 Months Post-TreatmentBaseline to 6 months post-treatmentThe BBT is a measure of hand dexterity. It is a count of how many blocks a patient can pick up, move over a barrier, and release in 60 seconds. The higher the score, the better the motor recovery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer (UEFM) at 6 Months Post-TreatmentBaseline to 6 months post-treatmentThe UEFM is a measure of upper limb motor impairment with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 66. The higher the score, the better the motor recovery.
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) at 6 Months Post-TreatmentBaseline to 6 months post-treatmentThe ARAT is a measure of arm and hand function with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 57. The higher the score, the better the motor recovery.
Change in Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) at 6 Months Post-TreatmentBaseline to 6 months post-treatmentThe SULCS is a measure of upper limb capacity with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 10. The higher the score, the better the motor recovery.
Responder RateBaseline to 6 months post-treatmentProportion of participants who had a gain of at least 6 points on the UEFM

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJayme Knutson, PhD

MetroHealth Medical Center

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
Hand Weakness
Moderate
21 Participants
Hand Weakness
Severe
18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than One Race
0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Chose Not To Answer
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
70 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
113 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants
Time Since Stroke13.1 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 440 / 420 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 445 / 420 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 440 / 420 / 46

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026