Skip to content

Rectal Surgery Evaluation Trial (RESET)

Rectal Surgery Evaluation Trial (RESET): Laparotomy vs Laparoscopy vs Robotic vs TaTME Rectal Surgery Matched Parallel Cohort Trial for High Surgical Risk Cancer Patients, With Mid- to Low Rectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03574493
Acronym
RESET
Enrollment
1098
Registered
2018-07-02
Start date
2018-10-16
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Keywords

laparotomy, laparoscopy, low anterior resection, rectal cancer, robot assisted surgery, total mesorectal excision, transanal surgery

Brief summary

Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard of care for rectal cancer, which can be combined with low anterior resection (LAR) in patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer. The narrow pelvic space and difficulties in obtaining adequate exposure make surgeries technically challenging. Four techniques are used to perform the surgery: open laparotomy, laparoscopy, robot-assisted surgery, and transanal surgery. Comparative data for these techniques is required to provide clinical data on the surgical management of rectal cancers by surgery.

Detailed description

The Rectal Surgery Evaluation Trial will be a prospective, observational, case-matched, four-cohort, multicenter trial designed to study TME with LAR using open laparotomy, laparoscopy, robot-assisted surgery, or transanal surgery in high-surgical-risk patients with mid-to-low, non-metastatic rectal cancer. All surgeries will be performed by surgeons experienced in a technique. Oncologic, morbidity and functional outcomes will be assessed in a composite primary outcome, with success defined as circumferential resection margin ≥1 mm, TME grade III, and minimal postoperative morbidity (absence of Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications within 30 days after surgery). Secondary endpoints will include the co-primary endpoints over the long-term (2 years), quality of surgery, quality of life, length of hospital stay, operative time, and rate of unplanned conversions.

Interventions

PROCEDURETME with LAR

Several surgical techniques are used to perform TME. Dissection using open laparotomy and minimally-invasive laparoscopic or robot-assisted abdominal approaches is performed in a 'top-down' manner, where the instruments are inserted transabdominally and the procedure progresses from splenic flexure/sigmoid colon mobilization to rectal resection. A transanal approach may also be used, a 'bottom-up' procedure where instruments are inserted through the anus to perform rectal resection and TME

Sponsors

Intuitive Surgical
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years old 2. Rectal adenocarcinoma from middle and lower third (less than 10 cm from the anal verge) with a sphincter saving procedure 3. High risk operative patients (two of these factors as assessed on MRI): 1. Obese patient with a BMI \> 30 (male or female) 2. Narrow pelvis: inter-tuberous distance \< 10 cm 3. Large tumoral volume with suspicion of close predictive margin (CRM ≤ 1 mm) at diagnosis 4. Expected coloanal or ultra-low colorectal anastomosis 4. Patients with adequate performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Scale score of ≤2) 5. Patient has signed and dated the informed consent before inclusion in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient with a comorbid illness or condition that would preclude the use of surgery. 2. Patients with T4b tumors which impose a pelvectomy 3. Patient requires an abdominal perineal resection (APR) 4. Patients with concurrent or previous invasive pelvic malignant tumors (cervical, uterine, or rectal; excluding the prostate) within 5 years before study enrollment 5. Patient undergoing emergency procedures 6. Planned rectal surgery along with major concomitant procedures (e.g. hepatectomies, other intestinal resections) 7. Metastatic disease 8. Pregnant or suspected pregnancy 9. Patients unwilling to comply with all follow-up study requirements 10. Patient included in another study which impact on the surgical technique or its choice.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of surgical method (success determined by composite of Oncologic, morbidity and functional outcomes)up to 4 yearsCRM, TME grade III, The absence of clavien dindo grade III-IV complications within 30 days post op

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026