Skip to content

Women's Responses to Adjusted Product Placement and Its Effects on Diet - 2

Nudging Healthier Dietary Habits: Evaluation of a Supermarket Placement Strategy in the WRAPPED Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03573973
Acronym
WRAPPED2
Enrollment
667
Registered
2018-06-29
Start date
2018-05-09
Completion date
2023-10-31
Last updated
2023-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diet Modification

Keywords

Dietary inequalities, Public Health, Choice architecture, Supermarkets

Brief summary

This study is the largest supermarket trial internationally and will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of improving the placement of fresh fruit and vegetables in discount supermarkets in improving the fresh fruit and vegetable purchasing of women aged 18-45 years.

Detailed description

WRAPPED2 (Women's Responses to Adjusted Product Placement and its Effects on Diet - 2) is a natural experiment with a prospective matched controlled cluster design. The setting is a discount supermarket chain in the United Kingdom regularly used by disadvantaged families for their main shop. The intervention is a store refurbishment programme that involves creation of a new fresh fruit and vegetable section in the store entrance. Control stores keep the existing layout with a limited range of fresh fruit and vegetables and placement of fresh fruit and vegetables at the back of the store. A total of 45 participants will be recruited from each of 18 intervention and 18 matched control stores through the retailer's loyalty card scheme (postal letter) and shop floor recruitment; these methods proved effective during the pilot. Participants will be women aged 18-45 years who shopped at a study store in the 12 weeks before recruitment. This study is unique in its collection of individual level sales data, as well as demographic and dietary information, and is the first to collect outcome data for more than one family member. Participant's weekly sales data will be obtained through the retailer's loyalty card scheme and will cover 3 months before refurbishment, plus 0-3 months and 3-6 months after. Change in women's fresh fruit and vegetable purchasing from baseline to 3 months is the primary outcome. Secondary outcome data about women's diets, their young child's diet (2-6 years), food shopping habits, perceptions of supermarket environment, and psychosocial and demographic characteristics will be collected by telephone survey before refurbishment, and 1, 3 and 6 months after. Weekly sales data for study stores will be provided by the retailer. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed from individual, retailer and societal perspectives. Process evaluation will assess implementation, mechanisms of impact and context. This study is politically and scientifically important being one of the first field studies of this kind. The findings could provide strong evidence for future public health policy interventions to help address inequalities in diet and non-communicable disease risk by supporting development of a healthy store layout that could be adopted more widely in food retail outlets.

Interventions

OTHERImproved product placement of fresh fruit and vegetables

The intervention includes the creation of a new fresh fruit and vegetable section at the store entrance with expanded range thus improving the placement (availability and position) of fresh fruit and vegetables.

OTHERSham comparator

The control condition is the existing store layout with a limited range of fresh fruit and vegetables that are placed at the back of the store.

Sponsors

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Medical Research Council
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Southampton
CollaboratorOTHER
City, University of London
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Natural experiment with prospective matched controlled cluster design. The setting is a UK discount supermarket chain.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women aged 18-60 years * Hold a store loyalty card * Shop regularly in a study store * Shoppers who choose items in-store but opt for home delivery

Exclusion criteria

* Women under the age of 18 or over 60 years * Males or children * Irregular shopper or online-only shopper * Do not hold store loyalty card

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant's weekly fruit and vegetable purchasing patterns0-6 month period post-refurbishmentThese data will be obtained through the retailer's loyalty card scheme and provide information about the number of items of each product purchased at each store visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Children's dietary quality3 and 6 month follow-up post intervention commencement20-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) will be used to create standardised diet quality scores for each child. Dietary quality scores will be calculated by multiplying the reported frequency of consumption of each of the 20 items from their FFQ by corresponding weightings derived from the appropriate principal components analysis and then summing the results.
Women's daily fruit and vegetable intake3 and 6 months follow-up post intervention commencement2-item tool has been validated against urinary potassium and plasma ascorbic acid to describe high (≥5 portions/day) and low (≤2.5 portions/day) intake.
Women's dietary quality3 and 6 month follow-up post intervention commencement20-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) will be used to create standardised diet quality scores for each woman. A dietary quality score for each woman will be calculated by multiplying their reported frequency of consumption of each of the 20 items from their FFQ by corresponding weightings derived from the appropriate principal components analysis and then summing the results.
To determine whether change in participants' in fruit and vegetable purchasing patterns (intervention effects) differ according to their level of educational attainment0-6 month period post-refurbishmentTo assess interaction on intervention effects according to participants' highest educational qualification attained in 3 groups (low=GCSE/school departure before 16 years of age, medium=A-levels/HND/diploma, high=degree)
Economic evaluation to assess the costs and benefits of the intervention from individual, retailer and societal perspectives6 month period post-refurbishmentUse participant survey and purchasing data for food expenditure, time spent food shopping, as well as travel costs to and from supermarkets; retailer costs will be estimates generated through discussion with supermarket staff; societal costs will be estimated for resources associated with the capital investment, changes in food expenditure, time and travel costs for individuals and health and social care costs for diet-related health conditions.
Weekly store sales of fresh fruit and vegetables0-3 and 0-6 month periods post-refurbishmentStore sales data will be provided from electronic transaction records aggregated to the weekly level

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026