Skip to content

Genetics Tests : How to Improve Management Within Two Medical Specialities

Genetics Tests : How to Improve Management Within Two Medical Specialities

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03572322
Acronym
ORGAGENE
Enrollment
36
Registered
2018-06-28
Start date
2017-09-18
Completion date
2022-04-13
Last updated
2023-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures, Genetics

Brief summary

This survey will assess discrepancies between official clinical genetics guidelines and practices within 3 West regions of France.

Detailed description

Genetic tests are now widely used in medicine whatever specialities or ages. However genetic tests are not common biological exams as they may either reveal genetic anomalies before any signs (presymptomatic diagnosis) or handle the gene pool of an entire family but not only one patient. Due to these specific managements, genetics tests have required specific laws for nearly 20 years in France. The French 2011 Bioethics Law (and its decree in 2013) especially issues involving genetic tests now establishes purposes for which genetic data can be disclosed and switch for patient civil responsibility towards his family. This patient has no longer choice and the medical confidentiality might now be breached. Although specific guidelines practices have been spread by officials, the gap between recommendations and uses tend probably to be huge especially from non-geneticist physicians. This survey will assess discrepancies between official clinical genetics guidelines and practices within 3 West regions of France. 20 focus groups are intended to be lead with neurologists and oncologists working in hospitals as theses physicians face different genetic issues daily. 20 interviews are scheduled with patients. The investigators aim at collecting information from medical, legal and sociological points of view in order to better understand these gaps. This will be the first attempt to gather and understand medical practices in the genetic tests area. This could be useful to adapt courses in medical school and along professional life and how to spread them for a deep impact.

Interventions

OTHERFocus Group

Focus Group

OTHERInterviews

Interviews

Sponsors

IMT Atlantique Nantes - France
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Université de Caen Normandie
CollaboratorOTHER
Université Rennes 1 - France
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Rennes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Specialists in Oncology, Endocrinology, Neurology and Medical Genetics * Doctors who have already received and returned genetics tests results * Main hospital exercise (CHU, CH, CRLCC) on the territory of the HUGO interregion regrouping the administrative regions Bretagne, Pays-de-Loire and Centre * Adults who having benefited genetics tests * Ability to express oneself easily in French and whose clinical situation allows it

Exclusion criteria

* liberal doctor * Patient refusing to participated in the study * Medical contraindication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Characteristics of the determining factorsthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearCharacteristics of the determining factors (medical, sociological, ethical and legal) in the medical practices during the implementation of an ECGP

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026