Lymphatic Filariases, Trachoma
Conditions
Brief summary
Cluster-randomised trial comparing co-administration of Azithromycin/Ivermectin/Albendazole with separate administration of Azithromycin and Ivermectin/Albendazole. The study will be conducted in Beneshangul-Gumuz region, Ethiopia. Within this district, a study group of 8,000 people (in approximately 40 clusters) will receive the azithromycin, ivermectin & albendazole at a single time. A control group of 8,000 people (in approximately 40 clusters) within the same district will receive the current MDA treatment schedule beginning with Ivermectin/Albendazole followed two weeks later with azithromycin. All drug dosing will be in line with standard FMOH and WHO Guidelines for MDA for trachoma and lymphatic filariasis. The study will randomly sort subdistrict communities (Gotes) into the trial arm and the control arm. The study will compare the number of adverse events (AEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs) between the two arms to determine if co-administration is not inferior to the standard treatment. The primary outcome will be to demonstrate the safety of the triple-drug administration as measured by incidence of AEs/SAEs following the MDA.
Interventions
DRUGAdministration of Albendazole on Day 1
Participants will receive Albendazole 400mg on study day 1.
DRUGAdministration of Ivermectin on Day 1
Participants will receive Ivermectin 150mcg/kg (max 12mg) on study day 1. Doses of Ivermectin will be determined using a standard dosing pole.
DRUGAdministration of Azithromycin on Day 1
Participants will receive Azithromycin 20mg/kg (max 1gm) on study day 1. Doses of Azithromycin will be determined using a standard dosing pole.
DRUGAdministration of Azithromycin on Day 15
Participants will receive Azithromycin 20mg/kg (max 1gm) on study day 15. Doses of Azithromycin will be determined using a standard dosing pole.
Sponsors
Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Ethiopia
Federal Minstry of Health of Ethiopia
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Cluster randomised trial. Approximately 40 clusters per study arm
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Residing in the community for at least three months; 2. Eligible to receive all three agents according to standard MDA criteria
Exclusion criteria
1. Not eligible to receive one or more drugs according to standard MDA criteria; 2. Less than 5 years of age (not eligible for ivermectin)\*\* 3. Pregnant women (azithromycin only, not eligible for albendazole and ivermectin) 4. Lactating women (Only administered azithromycin and albendazole, not eligible for ivermectin)\*\* 5. History of allergies to the drugs being studied (azithromycin, ivermectin, albendazole) 6. Residents who cannot swallow tablets * Note that patients that are not eligible for IVM, will receive azithromycin and albendazole. Patients that receive azithromycin and albendazole will be followed up through the same procedure as the triple drug therapy to try to track any AEs attributed to the two drug combination.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self Reported Adverse Event | 1 Month | The incidence of self-reported adverse events following MDA. We will collect data on the presence of common symptoms/signs prior to drug administration. All patients will be reviewed 24-48 hours after treatment and asked to report adverse events. We will calculate the proportion of newly occurring adverse events following treatment and calculate the whether the proportion of patients experiencing an adverse event differs between study arms, |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of Administration Drug Separately compared to Cost of Co-Administration of Drugs | 1 month | Analysis of the cost effectiveness of co-administration compared to separate administration of drugs |
| Community perceptions | 1 month | An analysis of community perceptions of benefits of co-administration at a single time point vs standard separated MDA will be conducted by conducting focus groups and in-depth interviews with study participants. |
Countries
Ethiopia
Outcome results
None listed