Skip to content

Incidence of POPF in the Resection of the Left Pancreas With RFAT

Incidence of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in the Resection of the Left Pancreas With a Radiofrequency Assisted Transection Device (RFAT-Pancreas)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03570502
Acronym
RFATPancreas
Enrollment
38
Registered
2018-06-27
Start date
2016-11-30
Completion date
2021-04-30
Last updated
2018-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Pancreas Tumor, Pancreas Cancer, Pancreas Neoplasm, Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Brief summary

This study evaluates the impact of the Radiofrequency assisted transection on the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after performing distal pancreatectomies, central pancreatectomies and pancreatic enucleation

Detailed description

Among the different methods for sealing the remaining pancreas, resection and sealing devices assisted by radiofrequency energy (RF) have been used, both in experimental studies and in clinical trials, in order to try to reduce the POPF rate. One of these devices is the Coolinside®, which is approved for this indication and is currently used in selected cases, at the Hospital del Mar, among other centers. Although there are several published studies based on similar technology, the existing publications on the use of Coolinside® in the pancreas have been made in rat and pig animal models. In particular, the most recent study published by Dorcaratto et al. compares the Coolinside device vs. the mechanical stapler in porcine model when performing distal pancreatectomies. The results suggest that the Coolinside device was more efficient in the control of the POPF than the stapler with a POPF index of 12% vs. 36%. Therefore, this study aims to obtain more clinical evidence about the use of Coolinside in pancreatic resections within a clinical context.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hospital del Mar
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with benign or malignant lesions of the pancreas * Subjected to distal, central pancreatectomy or enucleations of the left pancreas * Patients ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III * Open or laparoscopic approach.

Exclusion criteria

* ASA ≥IV patients * Patients with limitrophic or neuroendocrine lesions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pancreatic fistula according the 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS)1 monthGrade A postoperative pancreatic fistula is now redefined and called a biochemical leak, because it has no clinical importance and is no longer referred to a true pancreatic fistula. Postoperative pancreatic fistula grades B and C are confirmed but defined more strictly. In particular, grade B requires a change in the postoperative management; drains are either left in place \>3 weeks or repositioned through endoscopic or percutaneous procedures. Grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula refers to those postoperative pancreatic fistula that require reoperation or lead to single or multiple organ failure and/or mortality attributable to the pancreatic fistula.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AgeInclusion of the patient in the studyAge of the patient (expressed in years) at the moment of the intervention
Consistency of the pancreasInclusion of the patient in the studyIt can be defined as normal, soft or fibrotic
Level of jaundiceAt the moment of the intervention and during the first week of postoperative periodBilirubin level at the moment of the intervention and during the first week of postoperative period
Type of surgical procedureInclusion of the patient in the studyEnucleation, central pancreatectomy or distal pancreatectomy
Laparoscopic or open surgeryInclusion of the patient in the studyLaparoscopic or open surgery
Total bleedingDuring the interventionMeasured during the procedure
SexInclusion of the patient in the studyGender or the patient (Male/Female)
Type of tumourDiagnosisSerous cystadenoma Acinar cystadenoma Ductal adenocarcinoma Acinar cell carcinoma Cystadenocarcinoma of acinar cells Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia associated with invasive carcinoma Mixed carcinoma (ductal-neuroendocrine or acinar-neuroendocrine) Cystic mucinous neoplasia associated with invasive carcinoma Pancreatoblastoma Serous cystadenocarcinoma Pseudopapillary-solid neoplasia
Postoperative follow-up1 yearMonths of follow-up since the pancreatic procedure
Type of the postoperative complication1 monthDescription of the type of complication
Body Mass Index (BMI)Prior the surgery and during the PO follow-up (1 and 6 months)Measured such as: BMI in kg/m\^2
DiabetesBefore the precedure and during the PO follow-up (1 and 6 months)Does the patient has diabetes before or after the precedure?
Size of the pancreatic ductCT scan prior to surgerySize of the main pancreatic duct expressed in mm, measured on the last CT before the procedure

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactIgnasi Poves, Phd, MD
ipoves@parcdesalutmar.ca93 248 32 07

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026