Identification of Colorectal Polyps
Conditions
Brief summary
Interpretation of endoscopic characteristics of colorectal polyps with Blue Light Imaging A study of BLI images and videos of colorectal polyps will be presented initially as a training set followed by with explanation and teaching in a didactic session to two separate groups. A post-test will be conducted to look at the quality of the learning experience. To evaluate the teaching tool regarding the criteria for BLI images of colorectal polyps by the following measures * Inter-observer agreement between same and different groups * Accuracy in describing the morphology of colorectal polyps • This new teaching tool will improve * Inter-observer agreement by at least 5%- 10% (depending on the group) * Accuracy by at least 5%- 10% (depending on the group)• To determine the improvement of inter-observer agreement in identifying/ describing colorectal polyps after the didactic session in both the groups * Overall Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive predictive value and negative predictive value pre-and post-test in both the groups
Interventions
This is a teaching session on how to identify the colorectal polyps shot in blue light imaging.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
All gastroenterology attending physicians, gastroenterology fellows, residents and medical students at the VA medical center
Exclusion criteria
Not willing to participate H/O colour blindness or visual impairment Any intellectual disability
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| inter-observer agreement in identifying/ describing colorectal polyps | 1 year | it is measured by kappa statistic which measures the agreements of the total interpretations |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 1 year | Accuracy comparison between training and non training groups |
| Sensitivity | 1 year | Sensitivity comparison between training and non training groups |
| Specificity | 1 year | Specificity comparison between training and non training groups |
| Positive predictive value | 1 year | Positive predictive value comparison between training and non training groups |
| Negative predictive value | 1 year | Negative predictive value comparison between training and non training groups |