Skip to content

Clinical Description of a Bronchoscopic Approach to Ablate Lung Nodules Using the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter

Clinical Description of a Bronchoscopic Approach to Ablate Lung Nodules Using the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit With Thermosphere™ Technology

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03569111
Acronym
NAVABLATE
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-06-26
Start date
2019-02-27
Completion date
2020-10-28
Last updated
2022-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Lung, Cancer, Metastatic to Lung

Keywords

Lung Nodule, Bronchoscopy, Ablation, Microwave

Brief summary

The purpose of this investigation is to characterize the safety and performance of the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit with Thermosphere™ Technology in clinical use. This is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, non-randomized study. Up to 3 sites in up to 3 countries will enroll up to 30 subjects in total. The study is designed to characterize the safety and performance of the bronchoscopic ablation procedure using the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit with Thermosphere™ Technology.

Detailed description

The primary objective of this prospective, single-arm, multicenter, non-randomized study is to characterize the safety of the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit with Thermosphere™ Technology device in subjects undergoing lung ablation procedures. The primary endpoint is the composite rate of adverse events related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit with Thermosphere™ Technology through 1-month follow-up. The following secondary endpoints will be evaluated: * Composite rate of serious adverse events related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit with Thermosphere™ Technology through 1-month follow-up. * Composite rate of all adverse events related to the procedure or study devices through 1-month follow-up. * Composite rate of all serious adverse events related to the procedure or study devices through 1-month follow-up. * Patient satisfaction and pain (Bronchoscopic Ablation Patient Pain and Satisfaction Survey) * Quality of life (EQ-5D Scale) * Technical success * Technique efficacy

Interventions

DEVICEBronchoscopic ablation catheter

The Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit with Thermosphere™ Technology is deployed endoscopically and will be used to conduct bronchoscopic ablations in the lung using the superDimension™ navigation system.

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age 2. Subject has provided informed consent 3. Subject is able and willing to comply with the study follow-up schedule 4. Subject has a definitive diagnosis of cancer in the lung 5. Target nodule is ≤ 30mm in maximum diameter 6. There is ≥ 5mm of nodule-free lung parenchyma between target nodule and pleura or fissure 7. Subject is a candidate for an elective electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) procedure 8. Subject is a candidate for an elective lung ablation procedure according to standard of care and product Instructions for Use 9. Subject is not a candidate for lung surgery or refuses lung surgery 10. Subject is not a candidate for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or refuses SBRT

Exclusion criteria

1. Target nodule is abutting main stem bronchus, main pulmonary vasculature, esophagus and/or trachea 2. Patients currently diagnosed with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Stage IV emphysema 3. Female subjects who are pregnant or nursing as determined by standard site practices 4. Subject has participated in an investigational drug or device research study within 30 days of enrollment that would interfere with this study 5. The investigator determines that participation in the study may jeopardize the safety or welfare of the subject

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With AEs Related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit With Thermosphere™ TechnologyDuring procedure through 1-month follow-up (an average of 20-40 days post-procedure)The primary endpoint is the rate of adverse events (AEs) related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit with Thermosphere™ Technology through 1-month follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With AEs Related to Study Procedure or Study DevicesDuring procedure through 1-month follow-up (an average of 20-40 days post-procedure)Rate of all AEs related to the procedure or study devices through 1-month follow-up. Rate of all AEs related to the procedure or study devices through 1-month follow-up was also measured based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification. CTCAE grading is evaluated on a scale from 1-5 (1 - mild; intervention not indicated; 5 - most severe; death related to AE). Subjects could have more than one AE with different CTCAE Grades.
Number of Participants With SAEs Related to the Study Procedure or Study DevicesDuring procedure through 1-month follow-up (an average of 20-40 days post-procedure)Rate of all SAEs related to the procedure or study devices through 1-month follow-up.
Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and BreathlessnessImmediately following the procedure, 1 week post-procedure, 1-month post-procedure; all were collected at the 1-month follow-up visit (20-40 days post-procedure)Patient satisfaction, pain, and breathlessness (Bronchoscopic Ablation Patient Pain and Satisfaction Survey) At the 1-month visit, subjects assessed their pain/discomfort and breathlessness based on how they recall feeling at 3 different timepoints. The timepoints were immediately, one week, and one month after the bronchoscopic ablation procedure. Pain or discomfort were evaluated on a scale from 0-10 (10 - severe/interferes with basic needs). Breathlessness was evaluated on a scale from 1-5 (5 - too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when undressing). Subjects also evaluated their willingness to have the procedure performed again on a scale from 1-5 (5 - extremely likely), how likely they would recommend the procedure to family and friends on a scale from 1-5 (5 - extremely likely), and how satisfied they were with the procedure on a scale from 1-5 (5 - extremely satisfied).
Number of Participants With SAEs Related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit With Thermosphere™ TechnologyDuring procedure through 1-month follow-up (an average of 20-40 days post-procedure)Rate of serious AEs (SAEs) related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit with Thermosphere™ Technology through 1-month follow-up.
Number of Lung Nodules Evaluated as Being Treated According to the Study ProtocolImmediately post-procedureTechnical success: An evaluation of whether the lung nodule was treated according to the study protocol as determined at the immediate post-procedural timepoint. This is in contrast to procedures in which the protocol could not be executed completely, either for technical reasons or for reasons related to comorbid disease.
Number of Lung Nodules Evaluated as Being Effectively Ablated1-month follow-up (an average of 20-40 days post-procedure)Technique efficacy: An evaluation of whether the lung nodule was effectively ablated. Evaluates whether complete ablation of the nodule was achieved as evidenced by CT imaging follow-up 1-month post-procedure (including a window of 20-40 days post-procedure).
Score of Current Health State From Quality of Life SurveyBaseline and 1-monthQuality of life evaluation based on EuroQol \[EQ-5D-3L\] survey. The questions from the survey surround current health status. The subjects assessed their current health state on a scale of 0-100 (100 being the best health state imaginable).

Countries

Hong Kong, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NAVABLATE (Single-arm Study)
Observational NAVABLATE arm (single-arm study, no comparator)
30
NAVABLATE (Single-arm Study)
Observational NAVABLATE arm (single-arm study, no comparator)
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNAVABLATE (Single-arm Study)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
19 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants
Age, Continuous68.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
Bronchus sign present14 Participants
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease10 Participants
Eligibility for Lung surgery or SBRT
Declined both lung surgery and SBRT
10 Participants
Eligibility for Lung surgery or SBRT
Not a candidate for lung surgery and declined SBRT
5 Participants
Eligibility for Lung surgery or SBRT
Not a candidate for lung surgery or Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
14 Participants
Eligibility for Lung surgery or SBRT
Not a candidate for SBRT and declined lung surgery
1 Participants
Lesion morphology
Suzuki class 1 or 2 (Pure Ground Glass Opacity [GGO] or Mostly GGO)
3 Lesions
Lesion morphology
Suzuki class 3 or 4 (Halo or Mixed)
5 Lesions
Lesion morphology
Suzuki class 5 or 6 (Solid Pattern with GGO or Solid)
22 Lesions
Lobe location
Left Lower Lobe
4 Participants
Lobe location
Left Upper Lobe
6 Participants
Lobe location
Right Lower Lobe
8 Participants
Lobe location
Right Middle Lobe
2 Participants
Lobe location
Right Upper Lobe
10 Participants
Lobe zone of nodule
Middle third of lung
11 Lesions
Lobe zone of nodule
Peripheral third of lung
19 Lesions
Lobe zone of nodule
Proximal third of lung
0 Lesions
Nodule size (mm)13.7 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
No prior lung procedure performed7 Participants
Prior lung procedures performed
Lung surgery
11 Participants
Prior lung procedures performed
Non-surgical biopsy procedure
19 Participants
Prior lung procedures performed
Radiotherapy
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants
State of cancer diagnosis
Oligometastatic
10 Participants
State of cancer diagnosis
Primary Lung Cancer
20 Participants
Tobacco use (current or former)20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit With Thermosphere™ Technology

The primary endpoint is the rate of adverse events (AEs) related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit with Thermosphere™ Technology through 1-month follow-up.

Time frame: During procedure through 1-month follow-up (an average of 20-40 days post-procedure)

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Participants With AEs Related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit With Thermosphere™ Technology1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Lung Nodules Evaluated as Being Effectively Ablated

Technique efficacy: An evaluation of whether the lung nodule was effectively ablated. Evaluates whether complete ablation of the nodule was achieved as evidenced by CT imaging follow-up 1-month post-procedure (including a window of 20-40 days post-procedure).

Time frame: 1-month follow-up (an average of 20-40 days post-procedure)

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Lung Nodules Evaluated as Being Effectively Ablated30 lesions ablated
Secondary

Number of Lung Nodules Evaluated as Being Treated According to the Study Protocol

Technical success: An evaluation of whether the lung nodule was treated according to the study protocol as determined at the immediate post-procedural timepoint. This is in contrast to procedures in which the protocol could not be executed completely, either for technical reasons or for reasons related to comorbid disease.

Time frame: Immediately post-procedure

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Lung Nodules Evaluated as Being Treated According to the Study Protocol30 lesions ablated
Secondary

Number of Participants With AEs Related to Study Procedure or Study Devices

Rate of all AEs related to the procedure or study devices through 1-month follow-up. Rate of all AEs related to the procedure or study devices through 1-month follow-up was also measured based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification. CTCAE grading is evaluated on a scale from 1-5 (1 - mild; intervention not indicated; 5 - most severe; death related to AE). Subjects could have more than one AE with different CTCAE Grades.

Time frame: During procedure through 1-month follow-up (an average of 20-40 days post-procedure)

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Participants With AEs Related to Study Procedure or Study DevicesCTCAE Grade 50 Participants
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Participants With AEs Related to Study Procedure or Study DevicesComposite rate of all AEs related to the procedure or study devices21 Participants
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Participants With AEs Related to Study Procedure or Study DevicesCTCAE Grade 115 Participants
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Participants With AEs Related to Study Procedure or Study DevicesCTCAE Grade 211 Participants
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Participants With AEs Related to Study Procedure or Study DevicesCTCAE Grade 34 Participants
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Participants With AEs Related to Study Procedure or Study DevicesCTCAE Grade 40 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With SAEs Related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit With Thermosphere™ Technology

Rate of serious AEs (SAEs) related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit with Thermosphere™ Technology through 1-month follow-up.

Time frame: During procedure through 1-month follow-up (an average of 20-40 days post-procedure)

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Participants With SAEs Related to the Emprint™ Ablation Catheter Kit With Thermosphere™ Technology0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With SAEs Related to the Study Procedure or Study Devices

Rate of all SAEs related to the procedure or study devices through 1-month follow-up.

Time frame: During procedure through 1-month follow-up (an average of 20-40 days post-procedure)

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Number of Participants With SAEs Related to the Study Procedure or Study Devices4 Participants
Secondary

Score of Current Health State From Quality of Life Survey

Quality of life evaluation based on EuroQol \[EQ-5D-3L\] survey. The questions from the survey surround current health status. The subjects assessed their current health state on a scale of 0-100 (100 being the best health state imaginable).

Time frame: Baseline and 1-month

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Current Health State From Quality of Life SurveyBaseline74.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.8
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Current Health State From Quality of Life Survey1-month77.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2
Secondary

Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and Breathlessness

Patient satisfaction, pain, and breathlessness (Bronchoscopic Ablation Patient Pain and Satisfaction Survey) At the 1-month visit, subjects assessed their pain/discomfort and breathlessness based on how they recall feeling at 3 different timepoints. The timepoints were immediately, one week, and one month after the bronchoscopic ablation procedure. Pain or discomfort were evaluated on a scale from 0-10 (10 - severe/interferes with basic needs). Breathlessness was evaluated on a scale from 1-5 (5 - too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when undressing). Subjects also evaluated their willingness to have the procedure performed again on a scale from 1-5 (5 - extremely likely), how likely they would recommend the procedure to family and friends on a scale from 1-5 (5 - extremely likely), and how satisfied they were with the procedure on a scale from 1-5 (5 - extremely satisfied).

Time frame: Immediately following the procedure, 1 week post-procedure, 1-month post-procedure; all were collected at the 1-month follow-up visit (20-40 days post-procedure)

Population: The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who were available at that time of analysis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and BreathlessnessPain/discomfort immediately after procedure1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and BreathlessnessPain/discomfort one week after procedure1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and BreathlessnessPain/discomfort one month after procedure0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and BreathlessnessBreathlessness immediately after procedure1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and BreathlessnessBreathlessness one week after procedure1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and BreathlessnessBreathlessness one month after procedure1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and BreathlessnessWillingness to have the procedure performed again4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and BreathlessnessLikelihood to recommend the procedure to family and friends4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
NAVABLATE (Single-Arm Study)Score of Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and BreathlessnessSatisfaction with procedure at 1-month4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026