Skip to content

Short-Term Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy for Preventing Device Thrombosis Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Short-Term Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy for Preventing Device Thrombosis Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure. The ANDES Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03568890
Acronym
ANDES
Enrollment
510
Registered
2018-06-26
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
2030-09-01
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bleeding, Left Atrial Appendage Closure, Stroke, Thrombosis, TIA

Keywords

Left Atrial Appendage Closure, Anticoagulation therapy, Antiplatelet therapy

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to compare short-term (8 weeks) anticoagulation therapy (DOAC) vs. antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of device thrombosis following transcatheter LAAC.

Detailed description

Transcatheter left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as an alternative to anticoagulation for preventing thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Whereas most complications associated with LAAC have decreased over time, the occurrence of device thrombosis remains a concern, with an incidence of 1 to 17%. Antithrombotic therapy for preventing device thrombosis following LAAC has evolved empirically, with antiplatelet therapy being the most commonly prescribed treatment. However, the rates of device thrombosis post-LAAC remain relatively high and have not decreased over time despite of increasing operator/center experience and the arrival of newer generation devices. This is of particular concern if we consider that LAAC is a preventive treatment. Experimental and mechanistic studies have suggested enhanced thrombin generation (and not platelet activation) within the days-weeks following the procedure as the most important mechanism involved in device thrombosis and appropriate short-term anticoagulation therapy with DOAC should translate into a significant reduction in the rate of device thrombosis post-LAAC. Therefore, the objective of the study is to compare short-term (60 days) anticoagulation therapy (DOAC) vs. antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of device thrombosis following transcatheter LAAC. It is estimated that 350 patients will take part in the study. Update: A blinded interim analysis was performed with the analysis of clinical and TEE (central echo core lab) data from the initial 155 patients included in the study. Based on the results of the interim analysis, and considering the total number of events and the high rate (20%) of patients with either early cessation of the allocated treatment (before the 60-day TEE examination) or missing TEE at 60 days, it was decided to increase the sample size by 160 patients up to a total of 510 patients. This would ensure to include at least 350 patients with a TEE examination performed while receiving the allocated antithrombotic treatment.

Interventions

DRUGRivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, or edoxaban

Duration of treatment: 60 days

DRUGClopidogrel -75 mg/day

Duration of treatment: 60 days

DRUGLow dose aspirin -80 to 125 mg/day-

Duration of treatment: 60 days

Sponsors

Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Successful transcatheter LAAC with any approved device * Age≥18 years old

Exclusion criteria

* Absolute contraindications for anticoagulation therapy * Absolute contraindications for antiplatelet therapy * End-stage renal disease (CrCl \<15 ml/min) * Recent percutaneous revascularization with drug-eluting stents requiring dual antiplatelet therapy * Prior intracranial hemorrhage * Contraindications for TEE * Severe pericardial effusion within the first 24 hrs following LAAC * Major/life-threatening bleeding event within the month prior to LAAC * Multiple bleeding events (minor or major) within the month prior to LAAC * Major/life-threatening bleeding within the first 24 hrs following LAAC

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device thrombosis (efficacy outcome)60 days after LAACEvaluated by TEE
Combined outcome of all-cause mortality, bleeding, stroke, or Device thrombosis (Safety outcome)60 days after LAACClinically evaluated and diagnosed by the center investigators and determining a treatment change.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device thrombosis12 months after LAACEvaluated by TEE or computed tomography
Ischemic events60 days, 12-month, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year and 5-year follow-upStroke, TIA
Bleeding events60 days and 12-month, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year and 5-year follow-up
Major or Life-threatening bleeding events60 days and 12-month, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year and 5-year follow-up
Mortality60 days and 12-month, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year and 5-year follow-upAll cause mortality

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026