Skip to content

Hemodynamic Correlates of Distinct Hypnotic States

Multimodal Investigation of Distinct Hypnotic States - A Resting-State fMRI Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03568227
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-06-26
Start date
2018-07-13
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2018-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypnosis

Keywords

Hypnosis, Neurophysiology, fMRI, Resting-State, Hypnotic Sub-States

Brief summary

The investigation will assess the brain activation connectivity patterns associated with hypnosis and possible hypnotic sub-states by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). For that purpose, 50 healthy participants highly familiar with hypnosis (according to the OMNI-method) will be recruited and tested.

Detailed description

Despite the growing number of studies investigating of the physiological underpinnings of hypnosis by means of neuroimaging methods such as electroencephalography (EEG) positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), still no consensus exists regarding the underlying neurophysiological working mechanisms due to high levels of variability in the data. Generally, the variability observed in research examining the neurobiological fundamentals of hypnosis could be attributed to the following characteristics: 1. Heterogeneity regarding hypnotic induction procedures. 2. Insufficient statistical power. 3. Mono-Modality: Studies investigating the neurophysiologic mechanisms of hypnosis typically apply only one method for the investigation of their research questions. However, different techniques complement each other, hence, resulting in a more thorough understanding of the mechanisms of action. In this project, the investigators present a multimodal approach, in which these three points are considered in order to provide a comprehensive picture with respect to psycho- and neurophysiologic fundamentals of hypnosis and proposed distinct hypnotic states. Point 1) will be approached by applying a highly reproducible method for the hypnotic induction (OMNI-hypnosis). This hypnosis method is fast, direct and all OMNI educated hypnotherapists follow exactly the same induction procedure. This implies a high level of standardization and operationalization, crucial prerequisites to investigate the phenomenon based on scientific guidelines. Point 2) will be addressed by including a homogeneous study sample of 50 highly suggestible participants. Furthermore, the comparably high number of 50 participants should ensure sufficient statistical power particularly in consideration of the homogeneity of the study sample. Point 3) is addressed by following a multimodal approach combining a vast array of psychophysiological measures with multimodal neuroimaging. For that purpose, the project will be divided into three studies: A EEG- and psychophysiological study, a fMRI-study and a magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) study. In the present study, fMRI is applied for the investigation of network dynamics associated with hypnotic states. Hypnotic states will be compared to control states which follow mock instructions matched to the hypnosis instructions.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHypnosis

The hypnosis intervention consists of two elements: A hypnotic induction and a hypnotic deepening. The induction aims at guiding the participant into the first hypnotic state (state 1). The participants will remain in this state for 10 minutes, the duration of the fMRI-scan. The hypnotic deepening guides the participants into a very deep hypnotic state (state 2). Participants also remain in this state for 10 minutes, during which their brain activity is measured using fMRI

PROCEDUREControl

The control intervention consists of texts corresponding to the induction and deepening of the hypnosis intervention. They are matched in duration and consist of textually matched excerpts from www.wikipedia.org. Control induction will be presented, resulting in the control state 1 (10 min). Then the control deepening will be performed, leading to the control state 2 (10 minutes). During both control states the brain activity will be recorded using fMRI.

Sponsors

Mike Bruegger
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 18 and 65 * Proficient in German language * Written informed consent after being informed * Familiar with hypnotic states of OMNI-Hypnosis

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-existing neurological and/or psychiatric conditions * History of brain injuries * Alcohol and/or drug abuse * Chronic diseases that require a permanent intake of drugs Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Differences in resting state functional connectivity (assessed using fMRI) between the four conditions (control state 1 & 2, hypnotic state 1 & 2)90 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Differences respiratory frequency (assessed during fMRI measurements) between the four conditions (control state 1 & 2, hypnotic state 1 & 2)90 minutes
Differences in heart rate variability (assessed during fMRI measurements) between the four conditions (control state 1 & 2, hypnotic state 1 & 2)90 minutes

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026