Skip to content

Phase 2b Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ISB 830 in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study of ISB 830 in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03568162
Enrollment
462
Registered
2018-06-26
Start date
2018-05-31
Completion date
2021-08-03
Last updated
2022-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

ISB 830, OX40, atopic dermatitis

Brief summary

Phase 2b, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled dose range finding study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ISB 830 in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The study will be conducted in 2 Parts, with dosing Groups 1-4 comprising Part 1, and dosing Groups 5-6 comprising Part 2. All subjects will receive open-label ISB 830 after a 16 week blinded treatment period.

Interventions

DRUGISB 830 - Part 1 Group 1

Subcutaneous injection (SC) every 2 weeks

DRUGISB 830 - Part 1 Group 2

Subcutaneous injection (SC) every 2 weeks

DRUGISB 830 - Part 1 Group 3

Subcutaneous injection (SC) every 2 weeks

DRUGPlacebo - Part 1 Group 4

Subcutaneous injection (SC) every 2 weeks

DRUGISB 830 - Part 2 Group 5

Subcutaneous injection (SC) every 2 weeks

DRUGPlacebo - Part 2 Group 6

Subcutaneous injection (SC) every 2 weeks

Sponsors

Ichnos Sciences SA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals S.A.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects aged ≥18 years with physician diagnosis of atopic dermatitis for \>1 year as defined by American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria. * Atopic dermatitis involvement of ≥10% of body surface area at screening and baseline. * EASI score of ≥12 at screening or ≥16 at baseline. * IGA score of ≥3 at screening and baseline (on the 0 to 4 IGA scale, in which 3 is moderate and 4 is severe) * Baseline Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score for maximum itch intensity ≥3 over the previous 24 hours.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women. * Prior treatment with ISB 830 * Treatment with biologics * Systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory drugs or phototherapy within 4 weeks of baseline * Active chronic or acute infection requiring systemic treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Clinical Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16In EASI, four disease characteristics of atopic dermatitis (AD) (erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification) are assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). The scores are added up for each of the four body regions (Head and neck, trunk, arms, and legs). The assigned percentages of body surface area (BSA) for each section of the body are 10% for head and neck, 20% for arms, 30% for trunk, and 40% for legs. Each subtotal score is multiplied by the BSA represented by that region. In addition, an area score of 0 to 6 is assigned for each body region, depending on the percentage of AD-affected skin in that area: 0 (none), 1 (1% to 9%), 2 (10% to 29%), 3 (30% to 49%), 4 (50% to 69%), 5 (70% to 89%), or 6 (90% to 100%). Each of the body area scores are multiplied by the area affected. The resulting EASI score ranges from 0 to 72 points, with the highest score indicating worse severity of AD.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Both Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Clinical Score of 0 or 1 and an IGA Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16Baseline, Week 16The IGA is an assessment scale used in clinical studies to determine severity of AD based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe/very severe).
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score of ≥ 4 From Baseline at Week 16Baseline, Week 16Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-50) at Week 16Baseline, Week 16In EASI, 4 disease characteristics of AD are assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). The scores are added up for each of the 4 body regions (Head and neck, trunk, arms, and legs). The assigned percentages of BSA for each section of the body are 10% for head and neck, 20% for arms, 30% for trunk, and 40% for legs. Each subtotal score is multiplied by the BSA represented by that region. In addition, an area score of 0 to 6 is assigned for each body region, depending on the percentage of AD-affected skin: 0 (none), 1 (1% to 9%), 2 (10% to 29%), 3 (30% to 49%), 4 (50% to 69%), 5 (70% to 89%), or 6 (90% to 100%). Each of the body area scores are multiplied by the area affected. The resulting EASI score ranges from 0 to 72 points, with the highest score indicating worse severity of AD.
Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16Baseline, Week 16SCORAD (Severity scoring of Atopic Dermatitis) is composite severity index comprising a) the amount/extent of BSA affected; b) subjective symptom visual analog assessments for pruritis ( 0 \[no itching\] to 3 \[severe itching\]) and sleep disturbance (0 \[no sleep disturbance\] to 3 \[severe sleep disturbance\]); and c) 6 disease intensity assessments \[dryness/scaling, erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, lichenification and oozing/weeping/crusting, each graded from 0 to (none) to 3 (severe). A SCORAD score ranges from 0 (no AD present) to 103 (severe).
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Baseline, Week 16The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Baseline, Week 16GISS assesses AD lesions for erythema, excoriations, lichenification and infiltration/papulation. Each component is rated on a global basis (over the entire body surface rather than region) using a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe) according to the EASI grading severity. Total score ranges from 0 to 12 (no disease to most severe disease, respectively).
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16Baseline, Week 16The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire, with 7 items related to anxiety (HADS-A) and 7 items related to depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; scores for each subscale range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more distress. For each subscale, scores 7 or lower are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and 11 or higher indicate clinical anxiety or depression.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-75) at Week 16Baseline, Week 16In EASI, 4 disease characteristics of AD are assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). The scores are added up for each of the 4 body regions (Head and neck, trunk, arms, and legs). The assigned percentages of BSA for each section of the body are 10% for head and neck, 20% for arms, 30% for trunk, and 40% for legs. Each subtotal score is multiplied by the BSA represented by that region. In addition, an area score of 0 to 6 is assigned for each body region, depending on the percentage of AD-affected skin: 0 (none), 1 (1% to 9%), 2 (10% to 29%), 3 (30% to 49%), 4 (50% to 69%), 5 (70% to 89%), or 6 (90% to 100%). Each of the body area scores are multiplied by the area affected. The resulting EASI score ranges from 0 to 72 points, with the highest score indicating worse severity of AD.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16Baseline, Week 16For PGA of disease, participants rated their overall wellbeing on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (poor) to 4 (excellent). Participants were asked: Considering all the ways in which your disease affects you, indicate how well you are doing. Response choices were: Poor; Fair; Good; Very Good; Excellent. For PGA of treatment, participants rated their satisfaction with the study treatment on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (poor) to 4 (excellent). Subjects were asked: How would you rate the way your disease responded to the study medication? Response choices were: Poor; Fair; Good; Very Good; Excellent.
Percentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16Baseline, Week 16For PGA of disease, participants rated their overall wellbeing on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (poor) to 4 (excellent). Participants were asked: Considering all the ways in which your disease affects you, indicate how well you are doing. Response choices were: Poor; Fair; Good; Very Good; Excellent. For PGA of treatment, participants rated their satisfaction with the study treatment on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (poor) to 4 (excellent). Subjects were asked: How would you rate the way your disease responded to the study medication? Response choices were: Poor; Fair; Good; Very Good; Excellent.
Number of Missed Work or School Days at Week 16Week 16Participants who were employed or enrolled in school were asked to report the number of sick leave and/or missed school days due to AD (eg, versus due to an accident) in the last 4 weeks.
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ISB 830Predose (within 15 minutes prior to dose), 4, 24, 96, 120, 168, and 336 hours postdose on Day 1 and predose (within 15 minutes prior to dose), 4, 24, 96, 120, and 168 hours postdose on Day 85Cmax is the maximum concentration of ISB 830 observed in serum
Area Under Curve From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau)Predose (within 15 minutes prior to dose), 4, 24, 96, 120, 168, and 336 hours postdose on Day 1 and predose (within 15 minutes prior to dose), and at 4, 24, 96, 120, 168 hours postdose on Day 85AUC0-tau is the area under the curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval of ISB 830.
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 16Baseline through Week 16Participants with ADA were those with at least 1 treatment-induced or treatment-boosted ADA-positive sample at any time during the treatment or follow-up observation period (up to Week 16). Treatment-emergent ADA referred to percentage of the total number of evaluable participants who were ADA-negative at baseline but developed ADA following biologic drug administration. Treatment-boosted ADA referred to percentage of the total number of evaluable participants who were ADA positive at baseline with at least 4-fold increase in ADA titer after biologic drug administration.
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Baseline, Week 16The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in both children and adults. Participants respond to 7 questions, including dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping, each scored on a 5-point scale based on frequency of occurrence during the previous week: 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days. Item scores are added to provide a total score ranging from 0 (clear) to 28 (very severe atopic eczema).

Countries

Canada, Czechia, Germany, Poland, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted in 4 phases: a Screening phase (28 days before randomization), a Blinded Treatment Phase (up to Week 16), an Open-label Treatment Phase (Week 16 to Week 54), and a Follow-up Phase (Week 54 to Week 66)

Pre-assignment details

During Blinded Treatment Phase, participants received placebo-controlled treatment with ISB 830 administered subcutaneously (SC) for 16 weeks at different dose levels. During the Open-label Treatment Phase, participants received treatment with ISB 830 administered SC every other week (q2w) for 38 weeks.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ISB 830 300 mg q2w
Blinded Treatment Phase: ISB 830 administered at dose of 600 mg via SC injection (2 × 300 mg) on Day 1, followed by ISB 830 administered at dose of 300 mg (1 × 300 mg) via SC injection every 2 weeks (q2w) starting from Day 15 (Week 2) up to Week 14. Open-label Treatment Phase: ISB 830 administered at dose of 300 mg (1 × 300 mg) via SC injection q2w starting from Week 16 up to Week 52 (or until participant withdrawal). Participants were followed up for 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation, maximum up to Week 66.
76
ISB 830 300 mg q4w
Blinded Treatment Phase: ISB 830 administered at dose of 600 mg via SC injection (2 × 300 mg) on Day 1, followed by ISB 830 administered at dose of 300 mg (1 × 300 mg) via SC injection every 4 weeks (q4w) starting from Day 29 (Week 4) up to Week 12 and placebo administered via SC injection q4w starting from Day 15 (Week 2) up to Week 14. Open-label Treatment Phase: ISB 830 administered at dose of 300 mg (1 × 300 mg) via SC injection q2w starting from Week 16 up to Week 52 (or until participant withdrawal). Participants were followed up for 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation, maximum up to Week 66.
78
ISB 830 75 mg q4w
Blinded Treatment Phase: ISB 830 administered at dose of 150 mg via SC injection (2 × 75 mg) on Day 1, followed by ISB 830 administered at dose of 75 mg (1 × 75 mg) via SC injection q4w starting from Day 29 (Week 4) up to Week 12 and placebo administered via SC injection q4w starting from Day 15 (Week 2) up to Week 14. Open-label Treatment Phase: ISB 830 administered at dose of 300 mg (1 × 300 mg) via SC injection q2w starting from Week 16 up to Week 52 (or until participant withdrawal). Participants were followed up for 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation, maximum up to Week 66.
77
Placebo - 1
Blinded Treatment Phase: Placebo administered via SC injection (2 injections) q2w starting from Day 1 up to Week 14. Open-label Treatment Phase: ISB 830 administered at dose of 300 mg (1 × 300 mg) via SC injection q2w starting from Week 16 up to Week 52 (or until participant withdrawal). Participants were followed up for 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation, maximum up to Week 66.
80
ISB 830 600 mg q2w
Blinded Treatment Phase: ISB 830 administered at dose of 1200 mg via SC injection (4 × 300 mg) on Day 1, followed by ISB 830 administered at dose of 600 mg (2 × 300 mg) via SC injection q2w starting from Day 15 (Week 2) up to Week 14. Open-label Treatment Phase: ISB 830 administered at dose of 600 mg (2 × 300 mg) via SC injection q2w starting from Week 16 up to Week 52 (or until participant withdrawal). Participants were followed up for 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation, maximum up to Week 66.
75
Placebo - 2
Blinded Treatment Phase: Placebo administered via SC injection (4 injections) q2w starting from Day 1 up to Week 14. Open-label Treatment Phase: ISB 830 administered at dose of 600 mg (2 × 300 mg) via SC injection q2w starting from Week 16 up to Week 52 (or until participant withdrawal). Participants were followed up for 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation, maximum up to Week 66.
74
Total460

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event012001
Overall StudyDeath000010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up324232
Overall StudyOthers341421
Overall StudyPhysician Decision011010
Overall StudyPregnancy000100
Overall StudyProtocol Violation101111
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1515262269

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicISB 830 75 mg q4wTotalPlacebo - 2ISB 830 600 mg q2wISB 830 300 mg q4wISB 830 300 mg q2wPlacebo - 1
Age, Continuous38.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.87
37.55 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.21
36.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75
37.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.31
36.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.77
40.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
36.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.05
Baseline Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score28.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.602
30.84 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.63
31.81 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.34
29.86 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.223
33.84 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.91
30.42 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.11
30.65 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.173
Baseline Severity scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score66.22 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.408
67.16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.25
67.66 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.56
66.40 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
69.09 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.284
67.50 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.325
66.12 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.658
BMI26.32 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.199
27.05 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.27
26.50 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.434
26.03 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.167
27.49 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.167
28.72 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.538
27.20 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.608
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants15 Participants0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
75 Participants444 Participants73 Participants72 Participants75 Participants71 Participants78 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants23 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants58 Participants4 Participants6 Participants14 Participants13 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
65 Participants375 Participants69 Participants66 Participants59 Participants58 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants245 Participants47 Participants37 Participants44 Participants32 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants215 Participants27 Participants38 Participants34 Participants44 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 760 / 780 / 770 / 800 / 601 / 750 / 740 / 67
other
Total, other adverse events
68 / 7656 / 7864 / 7757 / 8043 / 6065 / 7537 / 7438 / 67
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 766 / 784 / 771 / 802 / 601 / 750 / 742 / 67

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Clinical Score at Week 16

In EASI, four disease characteristics of atopic dermatitis (AD) (erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification) are assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). The scores are added up for each of the four body regions (Head and neck, trunk, arms, and legs). The assigned percentages of body surface area (BSA) for each section of the body are 10% for head and neck, 20% for arms, 30% for trunk, and 40% for legs. Each subtotal score is multiplied by the BSA represented by that region. In addition, an area score of 0 to 6 is assigned for each body region, depending on the percentage of AD-affected skin in that area: 0 (none), 1 (1% to 9%), 2 (10% to 29%), 3 (30% to 49%), 4 (50% to 69%), 5 (70% to 89%), or 6 (90% to 100%). Each of the body area scores are multiplied by the area affected. The resulting EASI score ranges from 0 to 72 points, with the highest score indicating worse severity of AD.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Clinical Score at Week 16-57.589 percentage changeStandard Deviation 36.2014
ISB 830 300 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Clinical Score at Week 16-56.734 percentage changeStandard Deviation 32.5395
ISB 830 75 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Clinical Score at Week 16-38.099 percentage changeStandard Deviation 39.6857
Placebo - 1Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Clinical Score at Week 16-42.142 percentage changeStandard Deviation 38.1945
ISB 830 600 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Clinical Score at Week 16-59.737 percentage changeStandard Deviation 27.1176
Placebo - 2Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Clinical Score at Week 16-43.252 percentage changeStandard Deviation 41.2404
p-value: =0.00895% CI: [-34.944, 5.439]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.06195% CI: [-29.552, 0.674]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: =0.69195% CI: [-12.41, 18.698]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The analysis was conducted using a MMRM model for percent change from baseline in EASI with the corresponding baseline value as covariate, and treatment group, region, disease severity, visit as fixed effect factors, and interactions of treatment-by-visit, baseline-by-visit.p-value: =0.00895% CI: [-29.895, -4.503]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Area Under Curve From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau)

AUC0-tau is the area under the curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval of ISB 830.

Time frame: Predose (within 15 minutes prior to dose), 4, 24, 96, 120, 168, and 336 hours postdose on Day 1 and predose (within 15 minutes prior to dose), and at 4, 24, 96, 120, 168 hours postdose on Day 85

Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PKAS) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ISB 830, did not had any major protocol deviation affecting pharmacokinetic (PK), and for whom at least 1 sample with detectable plasma concentration with known time of dosing and the time of sampling was available. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure; 'Number Analyzed' = number of participants evaluable at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wArea Under Curve From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau)Day 8512990 h*µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.3
ISB 830 300 mg q2wArea Under Curve From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau)Day 112170 h*µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.9
ISB 830 300 mg q4wArea Under Curve From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau)Day 120340 h*µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.1
ISB 830 300 mg q4wArea Under Curve From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau)Day 8513120 h*µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 49.5
ISB 830 75 mg q4wArea Under Curve From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau)Day 853448 h*µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 97.8
ISB 830 75 mg q4wArea Under Curve From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau)Day 16671 h*µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.2
Placebo - 1Area Under Curve From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau)Day 8539420 h*µg/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2.6
Placebo - 1Area Under Curve From Time Zero to the End of Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau)Day 126930 h*µg/mL
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16

The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much). Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies the number of participants analyzed at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Baseline15.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Change at Week 16-7.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.58
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Baseline15.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.14
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Change at Week 16-6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.16
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Baseline14.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.18
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Change at Week 16-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.13
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Baseline14.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.77
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Change at Week 16-4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Baseline14.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.02
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Change at Week 16-6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.19
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Baseline14.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.78
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16Change at Week 16-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16

GISS assesses AD lesions for erythema, excoriations, lichenification and infiltration/papulation. Each component is rated on a global basis (over the entire body surface rather than region) using a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe) according to the EASI grading severity. Total score ranges from 0 to 12 (no disease to most severe disease, respectively).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies the number of participants analyzed at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Baseline9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Change at Week 16-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Baseline9.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Change at Week 16-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Baseline9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Change at Week 16-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Baseline8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Change at Week 16-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Baseline9.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Change at Week 16-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Baseline8.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Global Individual Signs Score (GISS) at Week 16Change at Week 16-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16

The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire, with 7 items related to anxiety (HADS-A) and 7 items related to depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; scores for each subscale range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more distress. For each subscale, scores 7 or lower are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and 11 or higher indicate clinical anxiety or depression.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies the number of participants analyzed for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Baseline4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Change at Week 16-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Change at Week 16-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.34
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Baseline6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.47
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Change at Week 16-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.05
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Change at Week 16-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.54
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Baseline6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.82
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Baseline4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.38
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Baseline6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.15
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Change at Week 16-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Baseline4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.19
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Change at Week 16-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Baseline4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Baseline6.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.74
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Change at Week 16-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.39
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Change at Week 16-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Change at Week 16-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Baseline6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.41
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Baseline4.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.81
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Change at Week 16-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Baseline5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.26
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Change at Week 16-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.85
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-A Baseline6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.12
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Subscale Scores at Week 16HADS-D Change at Week 16-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16

For PGA of disease, participants rated their overall wellbeing on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (poor) to 4 (excellent). Participants were asked: Considering all the ways in which your disease affects you, indicate how well you are doing. Response choices were: Poor; Fair; Good; Very Good; Excellent. For PGA of treatment, participants rated their satisfaction with the study treatment on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (poor) to 4 (excellent). Subjects were asked: How would you rate the way your disease responded to the study medication? Response choices were: Poor; Fair; Good; Very Good; Excellent.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies the number of participants analyzed for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Baseline2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Baseline2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Change at Week 161.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Change at Week 160.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Change at Week 161.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Baseline2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Baseline1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Change at Week 161.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Change at Week 160.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Change at Week 160.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Baseline2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Baseline2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Baseline1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Change at Week 160.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Baseline2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Change at Week 161.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Change at Week 161.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Change at Week 161.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Baseline2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Baseline2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Baseline1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Change at Week 160.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment Change at Week 160.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease Baseline2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16

The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in both children and adults. Participants respond to 7 questions, including dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping, each scored on a 5-point scale based on frequency of occurrence during the previous week: 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days. Item scores are added to provide a total score ranging from 0 (clear) to 28 (very severe atopic eczema).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies the number of participants analyzed for specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Baseline20.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.78
ISB 830 300 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Change at Week 16-7.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.44
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Baseline20.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.56
ISB 830 300 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Change at Week 16-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.79
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Baseline19.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.27
ISB 830 75 mg q4wChange From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Change at Week 16-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.51
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Baseline21.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Placebo - 1Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Change at Week 16-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.94
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Baseline20.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.63
ISB 830 600 mg q2wChange From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Change at Week 16-7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.37
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Baseline21.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.79
Placebo - 2Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16Change at Week 16-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.33
Secondary

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ISB 830

Cmax is the maximum concentration of ISB 830 observed in serum

Time frame: Predose (within 15 minutes prior to dose), 4, 24, 96, 120, 168, and 336 hours postdose on Day 1 and predose (within 15 minutes prior to dose), 4, 24, 96, 120, and 168 hours postdose on Day 85

Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PKAS) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ISB 830, did not had any major protocol deviation affecting pharmacokinetic (PK), and for whom at least 1 sample with detectable plasma concentration with known time of dosing and the time of sampling was available. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure; 'Number Analyzed' = number of participants evaluable at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wMaximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ISB 830Day 146.98 micrograms per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.5
ISB 830 300 mg q2wMaximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ISB 830Day 8552.33 micrograms per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45.8
ISB 830 300 mg q4wMaximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ISB 830Day 8531.20 micrograms per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 60.4
ISB 830 300 mg q4wMaximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ISB 830Day 149.95 micrograms per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.1
ISB 830 75 mg q4wMaximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ISB 830Day 858.8 micrograms per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 73.6
ISB 830 75 mg q4wMaximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ISB 830Day 116.62 micrograms per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.6
Placebo - 1Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ISB 830Day 85144.80 micrograms per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.8
Placebo - 1Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ISB 830Day 192.84 micrograms per milliliters (µg/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 12.3
Secondary

Number of Missed Work or School Days at Week 16

Participants who were employed or enrolled in school were asked to report the number of sick leave and/or missed school days due to AD (eg, versus due to an accident) in the last 4 weeks.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wNumber of Missed Work or School Days at Week 161.2 daysStandard Deviation 3.73
ISB 830 300 mg q4wNumber of Missed Work or School Days at Week 160.5 daysStandard Deviation 0.92
ISB 830 75 mg q4wNumber of Missed Work or School Days at Week 160.5 daysStandard Deviation 1.26
Placebo - 1Number of Missed Work or School Days at Week 160.5 daysStandard Deviation 1.29
ISB 830 600 mg q2wNumber of Missed Work or School Days at Week 164.9 daysStandard Deviation 14.92
Placebo - 2Number of Missed Work or School Days at Week 161.4 daysStandard Deviation 5.31
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16

For PGA of disease, participants rated their overall wellbeing on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (poor) to 4 (excellent). Participants were asked: Considering all the ways in which your disease affects you, indicate how well you are doing. Response choices were: Poor; Fair; Good; Very Good; Excellent. For PGA of treatment, participants rated their satisfaction with the study treatment on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (poor) to 4 (excellent). Subjects were asked: How would you rate the way your disease responded to the study medication? Response choices were: Poor; Fair; Good; Very Good; Excellent.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wPercentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease: Percent Change at Week 1672.2 percentage changeStandard Deviation 93.51
ISB 830 300 mg q2wPercentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment: Percent Change at Week 1642.3 percentage changeStandard Deviation 75.61
ISB 830 300 mg q4wPercentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease: Percent Change at Week 1673.3 percentage changeStandard Deviation 114.18
ISB 830 300 mg q4wPercentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment: Percent Change at Week 1650.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 97.24
ISB 830 75 mg q4wPercentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease: Percent Change at Week 1633.3 percentage changeStandard Deviation 87.25
ISB 830 75 mg q4wPercentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment: Percent Change at Week 1616.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 64.62
Placebo - 1Percentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease: Percent Change at Week 1676.2 percentage changeStandard Deviation 101.89
Placebo - 1Percentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment: Percent Change at Week 1621.3 percentage changeStandard Deviation 56.76
ISB 830 600 mg q2wPercentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease: Percent Change at Week 1669.2 percentage changeStandard Deviation 92.85
ISB 830 600 mg q2wPercentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment: Percent Change at Week 1655.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 93.81
Placebo - 2Percentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Disease: Percent Change at Week 1640.4 percentage changeStandard Deviation 76.89
Placebo - 2Percentage Change From Baseline in PGA of Disease and Treatment at Week 16PGA of Treatment: Percent Change at Week 1615.2 percentage changeStandard Deviation 61.29
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-50) at Week 16

In EASI, 4 disease characteristics of AD are assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). The scores are added up for each of the 4 body regions (Head and neck, trunk, arms, and legs). The assigned percentages of BSA for each section of the body are 10% for head and neck, 20% for arms, 30% for trunk, and 40% for legs. Each subtotal score is multiplied by the BSA represented by that region. In addition, an area score of 0 to 6 is assigned for each body region, depending on the percentage of AD-affected skin: 0 (none), 1 (1% to 9%), 2 (10% to 29%), 3 (30% to 49%), 4 (50% to 69%), 5 (70% to 89%), or 6 (90% to 100%). Each of the body area scores are multiplied by the area affected. The resulting EASI score ranges from 0 to 72 points, with the highest score indicating worse severity of AD.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Any participant who received a rescue medication for AD during Part 1, had missing Week 16 assessment, or withdrew before Week 16 was considered Nonresponder

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ISB 830 300 mg q2wPercentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-50) at Week 1648.7 percentage of participants
ISB 830 300 mg q4wPercentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-50) at Week 1634.6 percentage of participants
ISB 830 75 mg q4wPercentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-50) at Week 1627.3 percentage of participants
Placebo - 1Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-50) at Week 1627.5 percentage of participants
ISB 830 600 mg q2wPercentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-50) at Week 1644.0 percentage of participants
Placebo - 2Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-50) at Week 1633.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-75) at Week 16

In EASI, 4 disease characteristics of AD are assessed for severity on a scale of 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). The scores are added up for each of the 4 body regions (Head and neck, trunk, arms, and legs). The assigned percentages of BSA for each section of the body are 10% for head and neck, 20% for arms, 30% for trunk, and 40% for legs. Each subtotal score is multiplied by the BSA represented by that region. In addition, an area score of 0 to 6 is assigned for each body region, depending on the percentage of AD-affected skin: 0 (none), 1 (1% to 9%), 2 (10% to 29%), 3 (30% to 49%), 4 (50% to 69%), 5 (70% to 89%), or 6 (90% to 100%). Each of the body area scores are multiplied by the area affected. The resulting EASI score ranges from 0 to 72 points, with the highest score indicating worse severity of AD.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Any participant who received a rescue medication for AD during Part 1, had missed Week 16 assessment, or withdrew before Week 16 was considered Non-responder.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ISB 830 300 mg q2wPercentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-75) at Week 1623.7 percentage of participants
ISB 830 300 mg q4wPercentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-75) at Week 1620.5 percentage of participants
ISB 830 75 mg q4wPercentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-75) at Week 1611.7 percentage of participants
Placebo - 1Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-75) at Week 1611.3 percentage of participants
ISB 830 600 mg q2wPercentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-75) at Week 1625.3 percentage of participants
Placebo - 2Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI-75) at Week 1618.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Both Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Clinical Score of 0 or 1 and an IGA Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16

The IGA is an assessment scale used in clinical studies to determine severity of AD based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe/very severe).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Any participant who received a rescue medication for AD during Part 1, had missed Week 16 assessment, or withdrew before Week 16 was considered Non-responder.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ISB 830 300 mg q2wPercentage of Participants Achieving Both Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Clinical Score of 0 or 1 and an IGA Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 1613.2 percentage of participants
ISB 830 300 mg q4wPercentage of Participants Achieving Both Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Clinical Score of 0 or 1 and an IGA Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 1610.3 percentage of participants
ISB 830 75 mg q4wPercentage of Participants Achieving Both Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Clinical Score of 0 or 1 and an IGA Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 166.5 percentage of participants
Placebo - 1Percentage of Participants Achieving Both Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Clinical Score of 0 or 1 and an IGA Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 165.0 percentage of participants
ISB 830 600 mg q2wPercentage of Participants Achieving Both Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Clinical Score of 0 or 1 and an IGA Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 1612.0 percentage of participants
Placebo - 2Percentage of Participants Achieving Both Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Clinical Score of 0 or 1 and an IGA Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 165.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 16

Participants with ADA were those with at least 1 treatment-induced or treatment-boosted ADA-positive sample at any time during the treatment or follow-up observation period (up to Week 16). Treatment-emergent ADA referred to percentage of the total number of evaluable participants who were ADA-negative at baseline but developed ADA following biologic drug administration. Treatment-boosted ADA referred to percentage of the total number of evaluable participants who were ADA positive at baseline with at least 4-fold increase in ADA titer after biologic drug administration.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 16

Population: Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ISB 830 300 mg q2wPercentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 1613.3 percentage of participants
ISB 830 300 mg q4wPercentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 1629.9 percentage of participants
ISB 830 75 mg q4wPercentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 1650.6 percentage of participants
Placebo - 1Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 165.1 percentage of participants
ISB 830 600 mg q2wPercentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 1610.7 percentage of participants
Placebo - 2Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 166.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score of ≥ 4 From Baseline at Week 16

Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Any participant who received a rescue medication for AD during Part 1, had missed Week 16 assessment or withdrew before Week 16 was considered Non-responder.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ISB 830 300 mg q2wPercentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score of ≥ 4 From Baseline at Week 167.9 percentage of participants
ISB 830 300 mg q4wPercentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score of ≥ 4 From Baseline at Week 1611.5 percentage of participants
ISB 830 75 mg q4wPercentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score of ≥ 4 From Baseline at Week 165.2 percentage of participants
Placebo - 1Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score of ≥ 4 From Baseline at Week 1610.0 percentage of participants
ISB 830 600 mg q2wPercentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score of ≥ 4 From Baseline at Week 1613.3 percentage of participants
Placebo - 2Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score of ≥ 4 From Baseline at Week 169.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16

SCORAD (Severity scoring of Atopic Dermatitis) is composite severity index comprising a) the amount/extent of BSA affected; b) subjective symptom visual analog assessments for pruritis ( 0 \[no itching\] to 3 \[severe itching\]) and sleep disturbance (0 \[no sleep disturbance\] to 3 \[severe sleep disturbance\]); and c) 6 disease intensity assessments \[dryness/scaling, erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, lichenification and oozing/weeping/crusting, each graded from 0 to (none) to 3 (severe). A SCORAD score ranges from 0 (no AD present) to 103 (severe).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group assigned. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ISB 830 300 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16-26.519 percentage changeStandard Deviation 18.1662
ISB 830 300 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16-26.108 percentage changeStandard Deviation 21.4476
ISB 830 75 mg q4wPercent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16-18.405 percentage changeStandard Deviation 15.8756
Placebo - 1Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16-19.440 percentage changeStandard Deviation 17.4296
ISB 830 600 mg q2wPercent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16-27.401 percentage changeStandard Deviation 14.4471
Placebo - 2Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16-18.847 percentage changeStandard Deviation 14.4472

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026