Skip to content

Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator to Treat Deep Infrabony Defects

Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator to Treat Deep Infrabony Defects: A New Flapless Minimally Invasive Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03567161
Acronym
CUSA
Enrollment
11
Registered
2018-06-25
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2017-09-01
Last updated
2018-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontitis

Brief summary

The primary outcome of the present study will be assess the percentage of pocket closure and the secondary aim to evaluate the clinical performance in terms of clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction and gingival recession (REC) after the use of cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) in deep infrabony defects. Patients who were previously treated with active periodontal therapy followed by one year of supportive periodontal therapy (at least three sessions) will be additionally treated by the aid of CUSA. Subjects will be reviewed at 7 days, 15 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. These sessions will include supra-gingival professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) through the use of erythritol powder plus 14 μm. Clinical measurements of the defects and X-ray with bite block will be taken at baseline and 3 and 6 months.

Detailed description

This will be a Phase 2 non-controlled clinical trial performed on patients with infrabony defects to test whether the employment of CUSA for treating periodontal patients: 1. Provides benefits in terms of a PPD reduction and CAL gain 2. Is comfortable for patients and operators; and is free from adverse events All subjects included in the study will be consecutive periodontal patients attending a private clinic in Settimo Milanese (Milan, Italy) who will be treated by two operators with similar experience in non surgical produce who performed a specific training for CUSA on a periodontal model. The clinical procedure will be always performed in a single session. Before intervention, all cases will receive local anaesthesia with 1:100.000 mepivacaine. All residual pockets ≥ 5 mm will be treated with 1. Ultrasonic debridement: to minimize trauma to the soft tissues, the investigators used piezo-electric devices with specific thin and delicate tips (E.M.S. Electro Medi- cal Systems S.A. Chemin de la Vuarpillière, 31 1260, Lyon Swizerland). 2. Flapless treatment: according to the anatomy of the osseous sites, the sonotrode (Sonocare 300 by Söring GmbH, Justus-von-Liebig-Ring 2 -25451 Quickborn Germany) will be inserted both intrasulcularly and trans gingivally (smallest tip is 0,8 mm); intrasulcularly in the cases of three wall defects, and trans gingivally in cases of one to two wall defects . The stack of piezo-electric quartzes transforms the electrical energy from the generator into a longitudinal, mechanical vibration of the sonotrode tip. When the tip of the sonotrode approaches the tissue, the ultrasonic energy, as a result of the high force of acceleration and cavitation effect, separates cells from the conglomerate of tissues (fragmentation). The fragmented tissue can be aspirated as a semiliquid substance through the sonotrode hole, freeing the defect from the formation of a stable blood clot. The end point will be achieving a condition in which the infrabony defect is free from the granulation tissue. 3. After CUSA treatment, to stimulate the formation of a stable blood clot, the use of any sub gingival rinses will be avoided. No medications will be prescribed advising the patients to use painkillers (NSAIDs) if they experience postoperative pain. Subjects will be reviewed at 7 days, 15 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. These sessions will include supra-gingival professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) through the use of erythritol powder plus 14 μm (AIR-FLOW® MASTER -EMS). Clinical measurements of the defects and X-ray with bite block will be taken at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Outcomes : * Pocket Closure proportion (PPD \< 5 mm); * Probing depth (PPD) reduction; * CAL gain; and * Gingival recession. * Comfort and acceptability of the patient during and after the procedure, as measured by interviews, use of painkillers in the following three days and the visual analogue scale (VAS) after one week * Comfort and convenience of the operator during the procedure, as measured by interviews at the end of the procedure; and adverse events Continuous variables will be expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Dichotomous data will be expressed as a percentage. The comparison between baseline and 6 months after flapless treatment will be performed by applying a Wilcoxon signed ranked test.

Interventions

PROCEDURECavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator

Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) has proven to be effective in biofilm disruption and cell stimulation . The hypothesis is that the employment of CUSA for non-surgical treatment of infrabony defects thanks to its abilities to disrupt, fragment and aspirate granulation tissue, will allow the formation of larger and more stable blood clot. According to the anatomy of the osseous sites, the sonotrode (Sonocare 300 by Söring GmbH, Justus-von-Liebig-Ring 2 -25451 Quickborn Germany) will be inserted both intrasulcularly and trans gingivally (smallest tip is 0,8 mm); intrasulcularly in the cases of three wall defects, and trans gingivally in cases of one to two wall defects .

Sponsors

University of Milan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Having received a diagnosis of chronic periodontitis (Armitage 1999) 2. Being treated by full mouth debridement, and supportive periodontal treatment (SPT) in the last year (at least three sessions) by one of the authors 3. Having at least one residual pocket ≥ 5 mm with and intra bony component at least ≥ 2 mm

Exclusion criteria

1. Smoking more than ten cigarettes per day 2. Pregnancy 3. Irregular compliance during SPT in the last year; and systemic conditions or therapies known to affect the healing potential of periodontal tissues (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, oncological conditions, immunosuppressant drugs).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Periodontal healing - Pocket Closure proportion6 monthsPeriodontal Pocket Depth (PPD) is the measured distance from the free end of the gingival margin to the bottom of the periodontal pocket. PPD will be measured with the periodontal probe in millimeter (mm) and recorded in the periodontal charting. Successful result would be the achievement of residual PPD \< 5 mm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comfort of the patient by interview1 weekComfort of the patient during and after the procedure will be measured by interviews, using of painkillers in the following three days
Comfort of the operator1 dayComfort of the operator during the procedure will be recorded by interviews at the end of the procedure with a questionnaire
Adverse effects1 dayAdverse effects of patients will be recorded via questionnaire
Comfort of the patient - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain1 weekComfort of the patient during and after the procedure will be measured by interviews, recording the 10 cm-long visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, ranging from 0 to 10 cm, where is no pain 10 is the worst pain perceivable.
Gingival recession6 monthsGingival recession is the displacement of the marginal tissue apical to the cemento-enamel junction, thus the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the free gingival margin. Gingival recession will be measured with the periodontal probe in millimeter (mm), comparing gingival recession baseline to post-treatment values.
Periodontal Pocket Depth (PPD) reduction6 monthsPeriodontal Pocket Depth (PPD) reduction will be will be measured with the periodontal probe in millimeter (mm), comparing PPD baseline to post-treatment values.
Clinical attachment level (CAL) gain6 monthsClinical attachment level (CAL) is the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket. CAL gain will be measured with the periodontal probe in millimeter (mm), comparing CAL baseline to post-treatment values.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026