Skip to content

Efficacy of Camouflaged Syringe vs Conventional Syringe

Clinical Comparative Study of Efficacy of Camouflaged Syringe vs Conventional Syringe in Reducing Dental Anxiety

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03566212
Acronym
ECC
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-06-25
Start date
2017-08-13
Completion date
2017-08-30
Last updated
2018-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Behavior, Dental Anxiety

Keywords

Anxiety, Camouflaged syringe, Conventional syringe

Brief summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of Camouflage syringe vs Conventional syringe in reducing Dental Anxiety and increasing behaviour rating.Half of the participants received local anesthesia using camouflaged syringe, while others received using conventional syringe.

Detailed description

Dental anxiety and phobia result in avoidance of dental care. Since the injection itself can be painful, pain reduction procedures warrant continued investigation. Camouflage design deals with the visual impact of the needle and syringe though the tactile sensation remains unaltered. In our study, post treatment anxiety levels in camouflaged syringe was reduced as compared to conventional syringe group and this might be because, patients with low anxiety tend to have high pain thresholds.

Interventions

local anesthesia was administered in first group using Conventional syringe

local anesthesia was administered in second group using Camouflage syringe

Sponsors

Sneha D. Suwarnkar
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

local anesthesia is administered by using either camouflaged syringe or conventional syringe and was compared for reduction in anxiety levels in both groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* retained teeth, * badly carious teeth, * mobile teeth * requiring a dental procedure under local anesthesia were selected.

Exclusion criteria

* Mentally challenged children * those with medical conditions contraindicating the use of local anesthesia and / or surgical procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anxiety levels by using the Chotta Bheem and Chutki scaleafter 5 minutesAnxiety levels in both camouflaged group and conventional group in the children were scored before and after the procedure using the Chotta Bheem and Chutki scale. The Chotta Bheem and Chutki (CBC) scale comprises two separate cards: one for boys and the other for girls. The cartoon characters of Chotta Bheem and Chutki were chosen to depict various emotions for boys and girls respectively. Each card consists of a series of six figures depicting sequentially various emotions from 'happy' to 'unhappy and running away' of the cartoon character. Score 1 is happy face, score 2 is sad face, score 3 is crying face, score 4 is angry face, score 5 is shouting and score 6 is running. So, here, score 1 depicts patient is happy whereas as score increases anxiety level also increases which denotes that patient is unhappy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Behavior rating by using Frankel Behaviour rating scaleafter 10 minutesBehavior rating in both camouflaged group and conventional group in the children were scored before and after the procedure using Frankel Behaviour rating scale. Behavior rating scale comprised of scores from definitely negative to definitely positive. 'Double negative'(--) i.e. 'definitely negative' score indicates that patient refuses treatment, 'negative score'(-) indicates that patient is reluctant to accept treatment, there is evidence of negative attitude but not pronounced, ' positive score' (+) indicates that patient accepts treatment though there is cautious with treatment but follows dentist's instructions cooperatively whereas ' definitely positive score' (++) indicates that there is good raport of patient with dentist and accepts the treatment with enjoyment. So, as score increases from definitely negative to definitely positive, behaviour of children also increases.

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026