Skip to content

Real-world Comparative Effectiveness of Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Factor Xa Non-vitamin-K Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Phenprocoumon

Real-world Comparative Effectiveness of Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Factor Xa Non-vitamin-K Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Phenprocoumon

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03563937
Acronym
ReLoaDeD
Enrollment
64920
Registered
2018-06-20
Start date
2018-06-15
Completion date
2019-12-10
Last updated
2020-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

Existing real-world studies have provided evidence that novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in general and rivaroxaban in particular are more effective and at least as safe as warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with renal impairment. Nevertheless, it is known that clinicians often hesitate to prescribe NOACs to patients with even moderate renal impairment. Therefore, it is important to investigate effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and other NOACs compared to vitamin-K antagonists in NVAF patients with renal dysfunction in real life setting. The primary objectives of this study are to describe the risk of ischemic stroke (IS)/ systemic embolism (SE) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and renal impairment initiating treatment with individual NOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) compared to phenprocoumon.

Interventions

Follow the physician's prescription.

DRUGApixaban

2.5 mg or 5 mg, twice daily

DRUGRivaroxaban (Xarelto, BAY59-7939)

15 mg or 20 mg, once daily

DRUGEdoxaban

30 mg or 60 mg, once daily

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* First NOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) or phenprocoumon prescription (index drug) in the enrollment period between 1st January 2013 to 30th June 2017 (index date). * Age of at least 18 years at index date. * Continuous enrollment in the 12 months before the first NOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) or phenprocoumon prescription in the enrollment period (baseline period). * A verified ambulatory or primary/ secondary hospital discharge diagnosis of NVAF in the 12 months before the first NOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) or phenprocoumon prescription in the enrollment period (baseline period).

Exclusion criteria

* A verified ambulatory or primary/ secondary hospital discharge diagnosis of valvular atrial fibrillation, indicating pregnancy, transient cause of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism (VTE). * A claim for hip or knee replacement surgery in the 60 days prior to or on the index date. * A prescription of more than one oral anticoagulant (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban or phenprocoumon) on the index date. * A prescription of warfarin or dabigatran in the baseline period or on the index date. * A verified ambulatory or primary/ secondary hospital discharge diagnosis of end-stage kidney disease or a claim for dialysis in the baseline period. * Patients receiving an initial dose of rivaroxaban 10 mg/ 2.5 mg or edoxaban 15 mg (these dosages are not indicated for the treatment of NVAF).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Risk of Ischemic stroke (IS) / Systemic embolism(SE) (as combined endpoint and alone), recurrent IS/SE (as combined endpoint) and severe IS in patients with NVAF and renal impairment determined by inpatient claims based diagnosesRetrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017Severe IS will be defined according to an approach proposed by Schubert et al. as hospitalization with a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of IS in combination with an OPS (Operationen und Prozedurenschlüssel) code indicating one of the following: intubation, mechanical ventilation or percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy
Risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with renal impairment determined by inpatient claims based diagnosesRetrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017
Healthcare resource consumption in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and renal impairment determined by inpatient claims based diagnosesRetrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017
Overall costs in patients with renal impairment determined by inpatient claims based diagnosesRetrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017
Sector specific costs in patients with renal impairment determined by inpatient claims based diagnosesRetrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Risk of fatal bleeding in patients with NVAF (overall population as well as patients with renal impairment) determined by inpatient claims based diagnosesRetrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017Fatal bleeding will be defined as hospitalization with a primary hospital discharge diagnoses for bleeding with documented death as reason for hospital discharge or within 30 days after hospital discharge.
Risk of IS, SE, Severe IS and recurrent IS/SE in patient with NVAF determined determined by inpatient claims based diagnosesRetrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017
Risk of recurrent hospitalizations (in general and for IS/SE)Retrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017
Risk of Kidney failure determined by inpatient claims based diagnosesRetrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017
Risk of Acute kidney injury (AKI) determined by inpatient claims based diagnosesRetrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017
Risk of treatment discontinuation in patients with NVAF (overall population as well as patients with renal impairment) determined by pharmacy claimsRetrospective analysis from January 2012 - December 2017

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026