Skip to content

Evaluation of Immunobiogram® as a Tool in Adjustment of Immunosuppressant Therapy for Renal Transplant

Evaluation of the Clinical Consistency and Analytical Robustness of Immunobiogram® as an In Vitro Diagnostics Biotechnological Tool to Help Decision-making in Adjustment of Immunosuppressant Therapy for Renal Transplant

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03562845
Acronym
TRANSBIO
Enrollment
164
Registered
2018-06-20
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2023-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Transplantation

Brief summary

The trial is an observational, multi-center study to determine if a new blood test (Immunobiogram®) done after renal transplant can help predict how well the immune system is working and responding to a new kidney. These blood tests could, in the future, potentially guide how doctors manage patient's anti-rejection medication.

Detailed description

Rejection in renal transplants is a major problem unsolved in the long term, as 30-50% of patients lose their kidney due to rejection, or rejection mechanisms are involved elsewhere. One of the presumed key factors that may deliver such bad outcomes is the difficulties to personalise immunosuppressive treatment; a medical need that currently relies on immunosuppressive levels for some medications (pharmacokinetics), clinical guideline recommendations, adverse events profiles and some expensive biomarkers which are not widely used. Immunobiogram® (IMBG) is a tool that evaluates the sensitivity/resistance profile of patients to each of the most widely used and representative immunosuppressant drugs (IM). Thus, IMBG offers information that could become pivotal in clinical management of renal transplanted patients, if its potential benefits are proven. In this clinical study, a technology validation will be performed in which the robustness of the bioassay will be evaluated; and a correlation between the current clinical prognoses of each patient and resistance patterns will be explored.

Interventions

OTHERNA-Observational only

NA-Observational only

Sponsors

Biohope Scientific Solutions for Human Health, S.L.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 25 years and \< 70 years. * Male and Female. * Renal transplant performed at least 1 year before inclusion. ARM 1: * Bad clinical evolution: patients with renal dysfunction and positive biopsy to rejection OR significant increase in strength of DSA expressed as Luminex MFI. Specifically, the following two criteria must comply: * Renal function progressive deterioration, with significant creatinine increase of at least 15% for 18 months and/or proteinuria over \> 500 mg/day or ratio protein/creatinine\> 500 mg/g DE NOVO or increase in 50%. * Biopsy in the last 12 months that shows positive signs attributable to any kind of immunological response compatible with any type of rejection AND/OR at least 50% increase in strength of DSA expressed as Luminex MFI in comparison with previous determination and always at titers more than 3000UI. * Good clinical evolution: patients without rejection episodes, negative DSA, stable renal function and no changes in treatment in the past 12 months. ALL the following criteria must apply * Stable renal function in the past 12 months * NO DSA titers * No history of previous rejection episodes * Stable immunosuppressive medication (No change in prednisone or MPA dose and tacrolimus dose with changes \<20% of the dose) in the past 12 months ARM 2: * Stable renal function * No DSA titers * No history of previous rejection episodes * Stable immunosuppressive medication (No change in prednisone or MPA dose and tacrolimus dose with changes \<20% of the dose) at least in the past 18 months

Exclusion criteria

* Rejection of informed consent * Active systemic infections that needed antimicrobial treatment in the past two months * Active immune-based diseases with acute outbreaks in the past 12 months, despite immunosuppressive treatment * Severe ischemia-reperfusion injury of current renal transplant with delayed graft function objectively evident at more than 20 days after transplant AND/OR kidney transplanted from a deceased, very elderly donor (\>80 years) * Double transplant (renal + another organ) * HIV, HBV, HCV infection or other severe infectious diseases that prevent blood samples from being processed in a conventional laboratory * Chronic Allograft Injury (CAI) unlikely related to immune processes, by the Investigator´s judgement * Recurrent primary kidney disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate the robustness of Immunobiogram® (IMBG) as an in vitro Diagnostic Bioassay to study the sensitivity/resistance patterns of Immunosuppressant drugs in Renal TransplantationBaseline and 30 daysRobustness of Immunobiogram® (IMBG) as an In Vitro Diagnostic Bioassay to study the sensitivity/resistance patterns of Immunosuppressant drugs in Renal Transplantation, evaluated as follows: * Immunobiogram® offers personal sensitivity/resistance patterns of Immunosuppressive Medications (IM), with a range of responses for each IM drug considering all patients included * Immunobiogram® shows intrasubject consistency in terms of similarity with a maximum +/- 20% of variation in the inhibitory dose/distance 50 (ID50), in the three IMBG performed on inclusion; and additionally, similar consistency must be observed in the last three IMBG performed one month after inclusion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate intrasubject and inter-time consistency of Immunobiogram®Baseline and 30 daysImmunobiogram® shows intrasubject and inter-time consistency in terms of similarity with a maximum +/- 30% variation ID50, in the average response of the three IMBG performed on inclusion and the average response of the three IMBG performed one month after inclusion, provided that no significant clinical or immunological events happened during follow-up, as assessed with a specifically provided questionnaire and the Investigator´s judgement
Evaluate the correlation of Immunobiogram® sensitivity/resistance patterns with clinical evolutionBaselineARM 1 describes the Immunobiogram® discrimination ranges based on the correlation with the results of sensitivity/resistance patterns to immunosuppressants as regards the trend of clinical progression in each patient.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026