Skip to content

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for African Americans With Uncontrolled Type-2 Diabetes

A Randomized Single Blinded Interventional Study to Assess the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Culturally-Tailored Cognitive Behavior Intervention (CT-CB) for African American Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes and to Compare the Effects of Intervention to Standard of Care on Diabetes Control Measures.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03562767
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-06-19
Start date
2018-12-05
Completion date
2019-05-30
Last updated
2023-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

Culturally-Tailored Cognitive Behavior intervention (CT-CB), Family Practice, Diabetes

Brief summary

The main purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a Culturally-Tailored Cognitive Behavior intervention (CT-CB) for African American patients with uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes. After the baseline visit subjects will be randomly assigned to undergo a six session group-based or web-based behavioral intervention (CT-CB) program or to general education (usual care). The intervention duration is 12 weeks.

Detailed description

African Americans are approximately twice as likely to be diagnosed with diabetes and to experience gaps in diabetes care compared to Whites. Lower health literacy and socio-economic, language, and communication barriers are all associated with disparities in diabetes care. The role of Behavioral theory is foundational in understanding behavior change among patients in the self-management of diabetes. Further culturally tailoring increases acceptance and effectiveness of diabetes self-management. The aim of this pilot study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally tailored, cognitive behavioral intervention (CT-CB) program using a group-based vs. a web-based format, and determine if it can improve diabetes self-management among African Americans compared with usual individual based care at the clinic. Forty-five African American patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (HbA1C \> 8 %), aged \> 18 years, will be randomly assigned to undergo a six session group-based or web-based behavioral intervention (CT-CB) program or to general education (usual care). After 12 weeks, patients will be followed for an additional three months to evaluate for diminution of treatment effects. Both the group -based and the web-based CBT intervention group will be followed for an additional three months to study for possible diminution of treatment effects over time. Diabetic measures like Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at baseline vs. 3 months; the Patient Health Questionnaire to assess depressive symptoms; Diabetes Distress Scale, anxiety, self-efficacy, quality of life (SF-12), Diabetes Health Belief Scale, process measures such as Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), medication adherence questionnaire, session-participation, glucose self-monitoring, diet and physical activity are measured at each visit pre and post intervention. Trained study staff will also conduct neuropsychological tests including language and memory tests, attention and executive function tests, clinical diagnosis, activities of daily living (ADL).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGroup-based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention

This intervention will include six 1-hour group sessions held biweekly for twelve weeks. Each sixty-minute session will consist of 15 minutes of diabetes education regarding exercise and food planning and approximately 45 minutes of CT-CB presentations/engagement activities. Participants will be encouraged to bring along their family members or friends for support.

BEHAVIORALWeb-based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention

This intervention will include six 1-hour web-based sessions held biweekly for twelve weeks. Subjects in the web-based CT-CB will be asked to reserve a 1 hour period for a web call from the Behavioral Interventionist team. Text reminders will be sent to the participants prior the sessions. During this period, approximately 15 minutes will be reserved for diabetes exercise and food planning education and approximately 45 minutes of CT-CB engagement activities.

BEHAVIORALUsual Care

Usual care group participants will continue to receive care and follow up from their primary care providers as per the American Diabetes Association guidelines with log books, education regarding self-management strategies and appropriate referrals as needed.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Research staff conducting the psychological, physical, outcome assessments, and study analyses will be blinded to participant's group allocation. To minimize bias, participants in the intervention group will be asked to refrain from disclosing their group assignment to study staff who collect data and questionnaires. Due to the overt nature of the CT-CB approach, the investigators and participants in the intervention group will not be blinded.

Intervention model description

Three groups of subjects with uncontrolled diabetes Type 2 will be followed longitudinally for 3 months

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18 years or older * Fluency in English * African American * HbA1C\>8%

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with no web access, * Subjects using an insulin pump, * Subjects that are pregnant * Subjects that have active substance abuse including alcohol, * Subjects with visual impairment or have severe hearing or other physical disabilities that would be a barrier for participating in-group or web sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants That Complete the Study Compared to Enrolled3 months post randomizationFeasibility of the intervention will be measured as the percentage of participants who complete the study. The intervention will be considered feasible if no more than 20% of participants are lost to follow up.
Percentage of Participants That Are Enrolled and Attend the Study the Study Sessions Compared to Enrolled3 months post randomizationAcceptability of the intervention will be operationalized as study session attendance and will be considered adequate if at least 70% of the sessions are attended.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) ScoreBaseline and 3 months post randomizationThe Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) is a 17-item questionnaire assessing the severity of problems of living with diabetes. Participants indicate the degree to which each item impacts their life on a 6-point scale where 1 = not a problem and 6 = a very serious problem. The scores are summed and divided by 17 to generate an average score that can range from 1 to 6. Scores of 3 or more are considered high distress.
Change in 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) ScoreBaseline and 3 months post randomizationQuality of life will be assessed with the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The Short Form-12 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-12) is a measure of general physical and mental health. The SF-12 consists of 12 items with a Likert-type response format that measures quality of life with a Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Subscales associated with the PCS include physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, and general health perceptions. Subscales associated with the MCS include vitality (energy and fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. A scoring algorithm is used to generate a total score for each component ranging from 0 to 100. Low values represent a poor health state while high values represent a good health state.
Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) LevelBaseline and 3 months post randomizationHemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) in % will be measured via blood draw and processing. Normal values HbA1C are less than 5.7%, values between 5.7% and 6.4% indicate pre-diabetes, and persons with levels of 6.5% or higher are considered to have diabetes.
Change in Self Efficacy for DiabetesBaseline and 3 months post randomizationChange in Self Efficacy is assessed by Self Efficacy for Diabetes Scale that is administered at Baseline and at 3rd month post randomization. The questionnaire is a 8 item scale. Each question ranks from 1(not confident at all) to 10 (totally confident). The scale score will be compared from Baseline to 3 months post randomization. For diabetes, higher diabetes self-efficacy has been shown to relate to better self-care and glycaemic control. Increase in the score of Self-efficacy is found to directly reinforce adherence to self-care.
Change in Diabetes Health Belief ScaleBaseline and 3 months post randomizationChange in Diabetes Health Belief Scale is assessed by 25-item scale that is administered at baseline and at 3 months post randomization.Each question ranks from (1 = Strongly Disagree) to (5 = Strongly Agree).The scale score will be compared from Baseline to 3 months post randomization
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale ScoreBaseline and 3 months post randomizationAnxiety will be assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale. Participants use a 4-point scale in response to statements about anxiety (such as trouble relaxing) to indicate how bothered they have felt by item over the last two weeks. Degree of anxiety is rated as 0 = not at all to 3 = nearly every day. Total scores range from 0 to 21. Scores of 5-9 indicate mild anxiety, 10-15 indicates moderate anxiety and scores 15 and greater indicate severe anxiety.
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) ScoreBaseline and 3 months post randomizationDepressive symptoms are assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is a 9-item scale where respondents indicate how much they are bothered by certain problems on a 4-point scale where 0 = not at all and 3 = nearly every day. Total scores range from 0 to 27 with degree of depression considered minimal for scores between 0-4, mild for scores of 5-9, moderate for scores of 10-14, moderate to severe for scores 15-19, and severe for scores of 20-27.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A control group was intended to be added to the study, but the study team decided not to complete this additional research due to the pandemic. Additional funds were not available to enroll a new control group and thus, the study was terminated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention
Subjects receiving the group-based CT-CB intervention Group-based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention: This intervention will include six 1-hour group sessions held biweekly for twelve weeks. Each sixty-minute session will consist of 15 minutes of diabetes education regarding exercise and food planning and approximately 45 minutes of CT-CB presentations/engagement activities. Participants will be encouraged to bring along their family members or friends for support.
7
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention
Subjects receiving the web based CT-CB intervention Web-based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention: This intervention will include six 1-hour web-based sessions held biweekly for twelve weeks. Subjects in the web-based CT-CB will be asked to reserve a 1 hour period for a web call from the Behavioral Interventionist team. Text reminders will be sent to the participants prior the sessions. During this period, approximately 15 minutes will be reserved for diabetes exercise and food planning education and approximately 45 minutes of CT-CB engagement activities.
7
Usual Care
Subjects receiving usual care from their primary care providers Usual Care: Usual care group participants will continue to receive care and follow up from their primary care providers as per the American Diabetes Association guidelines with log books, education regarding self-management strategies and appropriate referrals as needed.
0
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLogistic Reason130
Overall StudyPhysician Decision200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionWeb-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionUsual CareTotal
Age, Customized
<55 Years Old
4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Age, Customized
≥55 Years Old
3 Participants6 Participants0 Participants9 Participants
BMI
Normal (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m^2)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
BMI
Obese (BMI >= 30.0 kg/m^2)
5 Participants4 Participants0 Participants9 Participants
BMI
Overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m^2)
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants7 Participants0 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants7 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 70 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 70 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 70 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants That Are Enrolled and Attend the Study the Study Sessions Compared to Enrolled

Acceptability of the intervention will be operationalized as study session attendance and will be considered adequate if at least 70% of the sessions are attended.

Time frame: 3 months post randomization

Population: A control group was intended to be added to the study, but the study team decided not to complete this additional research due to the pandemic. Additional funds were not available to enroll a new control group and thus, the study was terminated

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionPercentage of Participants That Are Enrolled and Attend the Study the Study Sessions Compared to Enrolled7 Participants
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionPercentage of Participants That Are Enrolled and Attend the Study the Study Sessions Compared to Enrolled7 Participants
Usual CarePercentage of Participants That Are Enrolled and Attend the Study the Study Sessions Compared to Enrolled0 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants That Complete the Study Compared to Enrolled

Feasibility of the intervention will be measured as the percentage of participants who complete the study. The intervention will be considered feasible if no more than 20% of participants are lost to follow up.

Time frame: 3 months post randomization

Population: A control group was intended to be added to the study, but the study team decided not to complete this additional research due to the pandemic. Additional funds were not available to enroll a new control group and thus, the study was terminated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionPercentage of Participants That Complete the Study Compared to Enrolled7 Participants
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionPercentage of Participants That Complete the Study Compared to Enrolled7 Participants
Usual CarePercentage of Participants That Complete the Study Compared to Enrolled0 Participants
Secondary

Change in 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Score

Quality of life will be assessed with the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The Short Form-12 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-12) is a measure of general physical and mental health. The SF-12 consists of 12 items with a Likert-type response format that measures quality of life with a Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Subscales associated with the PCS include physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, and general health perceptions. Subscales associated with the MCS include vitality (energy and fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. A scoring algorithm is used to generate a total score for each component ranging from 0 to 100. Low values represent a poor health state while high values represent a good health state.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post randomization

Population: There was an error in data collection forms provided to participants, which made these questionnaires unusable for data analysis.

Secondary

Change in Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) Score

The Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) is a 17-item questionnaire assessing the severity of problems of living with diabetes. Participants indicate the degree to which each item impacts their life on a 6-point scale where 1 = not a problem and 6 = a very serious problem. The scores are summed and divided by 17 to generate an average score that can range from 1 to 6. Scores of 3 or more are considered high distress.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post randomization

Population: A control group was intended to be added to the study, but the study team decided not to complete this additional research due to the pandemic. Additional funds were not available to enroll a new control group and thus, the study was terminated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) ScoreBaseline2.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) Score3 months post randomization1.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) ScoreBaseline2.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) Score3 months post randomization2.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Secondary

Change in Diabetes Health Belief Scale

Change in Diabetes Health Belief Scale is assessed by 25-item scale that is administered at baseline and at 3 months post randomization.Each question ranks from (1 = Strongly Disagree) to (5 = Strongly Agree).The scale score will be compared from Baseline to 3 months post randomization

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post randomization

Population: This survey was not administered to participants.

Secondary

Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale Score

Anxiety will be assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale. Participants use a 4-point scale in response to statements about anxiety (such as trouble relaxing) to indicate how bothered they have felt by item over the last two weeks. Degree of anxiety is rated as 0 = not at all to 3 = nearly every day. Total scores range from 0 to 21. Scores of 5-9 indicate mild anxiety, 10-15 indicates moderate anxiety and scores 15 and greater indicate severe anxiety.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post randomization

Population: A control group was intended to be added to the study, but the study team decided not to complete this additional research due to the pandemic. Additional funds were not available to enroll a new control group and thus, the study was terminated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale ScoreBaseline7.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.63
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale Score3 months post randomization6.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale ScoreBaseline5.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.28
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale Score3 months post randomization2.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.47
Secondary

Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) Level

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) in % will be measured via blood draw and processing. Normal values HbA1C are less than 5.7%, values between 5.7% and 6.4% indicate pre-diabetes, and persons with levels of 6.5% or higher are considered to have diabetes.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post randomization

Population: The A1C results may be affected by variations in point of care vs regular blood testing and the timing of follow up for participants. Data is included for participants who completed more than 65% of the intervention sessions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) LevelBaseline10.35 percentage of HbA1CStandard Deviation 1.01
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) LevelMonth 39.21 percentage of HbA1CStandard Deviation 0.91
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) LevelMonth 38.74 percentage of HbA1CStandard Deviation 2.06
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) LevelBaseline9.67 percentage of HbA1CStandard Deviation 1.39
Secondary

Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score

Depressive symptoms are assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is a 9-item scale where respondents indicate how much they are bothered by certain problems on a 4-point scale where 0 = not at all and 3 = nearly every day. Total scores range from 0 to 27 with degree of depression considered minimal for scores between 0-4, mild for scores of 5-9, moderate for scores of 10-14, moderate to severe for scores 15-19, and severe for scores of 20-27.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post randomization

Population: A control group was intended to be added to the study, but the study team decided not to complete this additional research due to the pandemic. Additional funds were not available to enroll a new control group and thus, the study was terminated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) ScoreBaseline7.29 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.47
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score3 months post randomization7.71 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.92
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score3 months post randomization5.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.87
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) ScoreBaseline6.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Secondary

Change in Self Efficacy for Diabetes

Change in Self Efficacy is assessed by Self Efficacy for Diabetes Scale that is administered at Baseline and at 3rd month post randomization. The questionnaire is a 8 item scale. Each question ranks from 1(not confident at all) to 10 (totally confident). The scale score will be compared from Baseline to 3 months post randomization. For diabetes, higher diabetes self-efficacy has been shown to relate to better self-care and glycaemic control. Increase in the score of Self-efficacy is found to directly reinforce adherence to self-care.

Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post randomization

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Self Efficacy for DiabetesBaseline7.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Group-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Self Efficacy for Diabetes3 months post randomization7.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Self Efficacy for DiabetesBaseline6.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Web-based Cognitive Behavioral InterventionChange in Self Efficacy for Diabetes3 months post randomization6.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026