Skip to content

Control Trial of Intermittent Hemodialysis With Regional Citrate VS Priming Heparin With Predilution in Patients at Risk of Bleeding

Randomized Controlled Trial of Intermittent Hemodialysis With Regional Citrate Anticoagulation Versus Systemic Low Dose Heparin Anticoagulation in Patients at Risk of Bleeding in Nephrology Intensive Care Unit

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03562754
Acronym
ROBIN
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-06-19
Start date
2019-03-11
Completion date
2021-05-27
Last updated
2025-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemodialysis

Brief summary

The study investigators hypothesize that intermittent hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation (Prometheus system/Frésénius) is more efficient than reduced systemic heparin anticoagulation in patients at bleeding risk hospitalized in nephrology intensive care unit

Interventions

PROCEDUREreduced systemic heparin anticoagulation

receive intermittent hemodialysis (Frésenius 4008) with blood flow at least of (200 ml/min) with double vascular access, biocompatible membrane dialyzer, low dose non fractionated heparine (5000 UI initially) and predilution with 25 mls/min dialysate

intermittent hemodialysis using Prometheus System with blood flow at least of 200 ml/min with double vascular access, biocompatible membrane dialyzer

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient has been correctly informed. * The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent. * The legal guardian or trusted-person of an adult under guardianship must have given their informed and signed consent. * The patient has health insurance coverage via the French social security system. * The patient is at least 18 years old. * The patient is at bleeding risk; the bleeding risk is defined by the clinical situation and according to predefined clinical situations (before or after surgery or biopsy, hemorrhage). * The patient requires an intermittent hemodialysis in a nephrology ICU setting.

Exclusion criteria

* The patient is participating in, or has participated in over the past three months, another interventional trial. * The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study. * The patient is under judicial protection. * The parents (or legal guardian) of the patient refuse to sign the consent. * It is impossible to correctly inform the patient/parents (or legal guardian) of the patient (language barrier). * Contraindication to heparin treatment. * Indication of continuous dialysis in ICU. * Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of intermittent hemodialysis between groupsEnd of intermittent hemodialysis session (average 4 hours)Minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Transmembrane pressure between groupsEnd of intermittent hemodialysis session (average 4 hours)
Blood aspect in the extracorporeal treatment circuitEnd of intermittent hemodialysis session (average 4 hours)Clotting phenomena
Hemodialysis treatment adequacyEnd of intermittent hemodialysis session (average 4 hours)KT/V value
Occurrence of metabolic disorders (hypocalcemia, metabolic alkalose)Hour 12Yes/no
Occurance of unexpected complications (almost none recorded in the literature)End of intermittent hemodialysis session (average 4 hours)Yes/no
Occurrence of hemorrhageHour 12Yes/no

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026