Skip to content

Clinical Trial for a Robotic Endomicroscopy to Better Define Resection Strategies Applied to Urology Surgery

Essais Clinique Pour Une Endomicroscopie Robotisée Dans la redéfinition Des Stratégies d'ExérèsE (PERSÉE) appliquée à la Chirurgie de la Prostate

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03561857
Acronym
PERSEE II
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-06-19
Start date
2019-01-16
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2019-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

This multicenter study aimed at assessing the feasibility of Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) during Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy or Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for intra-operative characterisation of surgical margins.

Detailed description

Prostate cancer is one of the most diagnosed cancer in men. Several treatments are available depending on patient's clinical features. When the cancer is localised or locally advanced, one of the possible treatment is Radical Prostatectomy. A risk of that procedure is the incomplete removal of cancer tissues due to the presence of cancer cells within the resection margin. A histological analysis of the resected prostate allows to assess surgical margins. If cancer cells comes out to the edges of the removed tissue, it is called Positive Surgical Margin (PSM). Several studies showed that PSMs are more frequent in case of extra-prostatic extensions of the cancer and are correlated with biochemical recurrence. A study conducted on 21 patients scheduled for Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy has already demonstrated the feasibility of the intra-operative observation of microscopic features of prostatic and periprostatic tissues in vivo and ex vivo with the Cellvizio® 100 Series system combined with the CelioFlex™ probe. The main objective of the study is to assess the feasibility and safety of pCLE technology during radical prostatectomy (RP) and to assess the diagnostic performance of pCLE technology for the definition of the resection margins. This method could be used to guide surgeons during nerve sparing surgery and provide real-time feedback for adequate dissection of NVB. As well, ex vivo characterisation of benign and cancerous glandular structures could provide an efficient and rapid method for intra-operative surgical margin assessment The study is divided in 2 parts: 1. Ex vivo study An ex vivo study will be carried out on 15 firsts prostate specimens for pathologist training and generation of ex vivo pCLE images atlas. 2. In vivo study Prior to pCLE analysis, a contrast agent (Fluorescein) will be administered: * by intravenous injection in each prostatic pedicles before their ligation * topically, after NVB dissection, in a spray solution through a catheter inserted in an assistant trocar or with a soaked gauze. The Cellvizio will be used during the NVB dissection to acquire in vivo images and sequences of prostatic tissues.

Interventions

DEVICEConfocal Laser Endomicroscopy

The study is divided in 2 parts. 1. Ex vivo study * Prostate specimens will be stained using Fluorescein * Images/sequences of normal and abnormal prostatic tissues, and peri-prostatic tissues will be acquired. 2. In vivo study * Intravenous injection of contrast agent * pCLE imaging every 5mm of the NVB dissection zone.

Sponsors

Mauna Kea Technologies
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Over 18 years * Localised or locally advanced prostate cancer * Agreement given for Radical Prostatectomy * Not eligible or refusing an active surveillance protocol * having given its signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Under 18 years * Previously treated for PCa (hormones, EBRT, focal treatments) * Surgical history of BPH treatment * Known allergy to Fluorescein

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pCLE criteria1 yearDefinition of pCLE criteria for normal and abnormal prostate tissues

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ease of use of the endomicroscopy device1 yearThe ease of use of the endomicroscopy device will be assessed using a questionnaire that the surgeon will fill at the end of each procedure
Audio/video telecommunication quality1 yearThe telecommunication quality will be assessed using a questionnaire that the surgeon and the anatomopathologist will fill at the end of each procedure
Number of participants with CLE imaging-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.01 yearThe device safety will measure by assessing the occurence and severity of adverse events during the study
Stability and reproducibility of images/sequences during procedures1 yearThe stability and reproducibility of endomicroscopy images will be assessed using a questionnaire that the surgeon and the anatomopathologist will fill at the end of each procedure

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026