Skip to content

Incline Training to Personalize Motor Control Interventions After Stroke

Incline Training to Personalize Motor Control Interventions After Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03561246
Enrollment
55
Registered
2018-06-19
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2024-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident)

Keywords

Stroke, Rehabilitation, Walking, Biomechanics

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the use of incline and decline treadmill training to address specific motor control deficits identified within different post-stroke walking patterns.

Detailed description

This study seeks to develop a theory-based clinical decision-making framework for the training of walking recovery after stroke based on how different biomechanical patterns of walking illustrate distinct motor control deficits. Each participant will complete 12 sessions (three times a week for four weeks) of either INCLINE, DECLINE, or CONTROL training. Clinical and biomechanical outcome measures will be collected pre- and post-training and after a one-month follow-up period. In addition, the investigators will collect a battery of clinical outcome measures before and after training. Spatiotemporal variables (including SSWS) will be collected before and after each session. All clinical and biomechanical assessments will be conducted by an evaluator blinded to training group allocation.

Interventions

OTHERIncline treadmill walking

Those with a Pp \<0.47 or \>0.53 will undergo INCLINE training during which individuals will walk for 15 minutes at a 10-degree treadmill tilt, stopping each five minutes for monitoring of vital signs.

OTHERDecline treadmill walking

Those with a Pp \<0.47 or \>0.53 will undergo DECLINE training during which individuals will walk for 15 minutes at a 10-degree treadmill tilt, stopping each five minutes for monitoring of vital signs.

OTHERLevel Treadmill (Control)

Those with a Pp \<0.47 or \>0.53 will undergo LEVEL training during which individuals will walk for 15 minutes at a 0-degree treadmill tilt, stopping each five minutes for monitoring of vital signs.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* stroke 6 months * residual paresis in the lower extremity (Fugl-Meyer LE motor score \<34) * ability to walk without assistance at speeds ranging from 0.2 - 1.0 m/s (with a support harness for biomechanical testing) * Ability to walk on a treadmill without orthotic or assistive device using overhead harness system * provision of informed consent, and 8) written approval from the primary physician (see attached sample of Medical Approval Cover Letter).

Exclusion criteria

* history of congestive heart failure, unstable cardiac arrhythmias, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, severe aortic stenosis, angina or dyspnea at rest or during ADLs * History of COPD or oxygen dependence * Pre-existing neurological disorders or dementia * History of major head trauma * Pp between 0.47 and 0.53 * Legal blindness or severe visual impairment * Severe arthritis or other problems that limit passive ROM * History of DVT or pulmonary embolism within 6 months * Severe hypertension with systolic \>200 mmHg and diastolic \>110 mmHg at rest.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Gait SpeedPre (same day but prior to initial training session) and post (immediately following final training session) approximately 4 weeks apart.Participants will be asked to complete a 10 Meter Walk Test and a difference will be calculated between pre and post speed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Paretic Propulsion SymmetryPre (same day but prior to initial training session) and post (immediately following final training session) approximately 4 weeks apart.Quantitative measure of the coordinated output of the paretic leg and is defined as the percentage of propulsion performed by the paretic leg.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Personalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - Incline
Determine the efficacy of motor control deficit guided personalized training on SSWS and Paretic Propulsion (Pp). Incline treadmill walking: Those with a Pp \<0.47 or \>0.53 will undergo INCLINE training during which individuals will walk for 15 minutes at a 10-degree treadmill tilt, stopping each five minutes for monitoring of vital signs.
19
Personalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - Decline
Determine the efficacy of motor control deficit guided personalized training on SSWS and Paretic Propulsion (Pp). Decline treadmill walking: Those with a Pp \<0.47 or \>0.53 will undergo DECLINE training during which individuals will walk for 15 minutes at a 10-degree treadmill tilt, stopping each five minutes for monitoring of vital signs.
19
Personalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - Level Treadmill (Control)
Determine the efficacy of motor control deficit guided personalized training on SSWS and Paretic Propulsion (Pp). Level treadmill walking: Those with a Pp \<0.47 or \>0.53 will undergo LEVEL training during which individuals will walk for 15 minutes at a 0-degree treadmill tilt, stopping each five minutes for monitoring of vital signs.
17
Total55

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPersonalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - Level Treadmill (Control)TotalPersonalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - InclinePersonalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - Decline
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants22 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants33 Participants12 Participants12 Participants
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.34
60.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02
61.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.33
60.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.19
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants54 Participants18 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants00 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants23 Participants10 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants32 Participants9 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 Participants55 Participants19 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants17 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants38 Participants14 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 190 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 190 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 190 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Gait Speed

Participants will be asked to complete a 10 Meter Walk Test and a difference will be calculated between pre and post speed.

Time frame: Pre (same day but prior to initial training session) and post (immediately following final training session) approximately 4 weeks apart.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - InclineChange in Gait Speed0.15 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.004
Personalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - DeclineChange in Gait Speed0.075 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.053
Personalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - Level Treadmill (Control)Change in Gait Speed0.127 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.062
Secondary

Change in Paretic Propulsion Symmetry

Quantitative measure of the coordinated output of the paretic leg and is defined as the percentage of propulsion performed by the paretic leg.

Time frame: Pre (same day but prior to initial training session) and post (immediately following final training session) approximately 4 weeks apart.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - InclineChange in Paretic Propulsion Symmetry-0.023 Percentage of PropulsionStandard Deviation 0.042
Personalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - DeclineChange in Paretic Propulsion Symmetry-0.034 Percentage of PropulsionStandard Deviation 0.02
Personalized Training Effect on SSWS and Pp - Level Treadmill (Control)Change in Paretic Propulsion Symmetry0.043 Percentage of PropulsionStandard Deviation 0.013

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026