Skip to content

Is Postoperative Bracing Necessary After Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions

Is Postoperative Bracing Necessary After Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03560401
Enrollment
90
Registered
2018-06-18
Start date
2015-10-20
Completion date
2017-10-22
Last updated
2018-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbarsacral Orthosis, Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Keywords

Bracing; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF); outcome; fusion rate

Brief summary

This study was started from Oct. 2015. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of bracing following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases.

Detailed description

The inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years and undergoing TLIF for degenerative lumbar disc disease, spinal stenosis, or spondylolisthesis. Those who had spinal fracture, spinal infection, spinal tumor, and a history of previous spinal surgery; and those who were lost to follow-up or failed to complete the questionnaires were excluded. Patients eligible for the study were selected by an independent research assistant. The study was explained, and informed consent was obtained from patients before the surgery. Using a randomization sequence, the patients were assigned to the brace or no brace group. The attending surgeons and patients were blinded before the surgery. Patients in the brace group were instructed to wear a rigid brace (Knight-Taylor \[chairback\] brace) full-time for 12 weeks, except when bathing or lying in bed. Patients in the no brace group were instructed to wear a soft corset for 2 weeks, after which it was weaned off. All patients started wearing the brace or corset during their first ambulation out of bed following drainage tube removal after the surgery. The success of interbody fusion was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) at the 6-month postoperative follow-up using the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification6. Radiographic fusion (BSF-3) was defined as bone bridging at least half of the fusion area with at least the density originally achieved at surgery. Radiographic locked pseudarthrosis (BSF-2) was indicated by lucency visible in the middle of the cage with solid bone growing into the cage from each vertebral end plate. Radiographic pseudarthrosis (BSF-1) was indicated by collapse of the construct, loss of disk height, vertebral slip, broken screws, displacement of the cage, significant resorption of the bone graft, or lucency visible around the periphery of the graft or cage. Perioperative complications, such as wound infection, epidural hematoma, intraoperative dural tear, nerve root damage, and implant dislodgement, were recorded, as were the reoperations and medically related complications within 6 months. The implant-related complications, such as screw loosening, cage migration, or broken screws, detected using plain radiograph at each follow-up and CT scan at the latest follow-up were also recorded. Pedicle screw loosening was defined as a radiolucent zone around the screw on a CT scan at the 6-month follow-up Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 22.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical data were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous data were compared using the independent t-test. The two-tailed significance level was set at p \<0.05.

Interventions

DEVICEKnight-Taylor [chairback] brace

Knight-Taylor \[chairback\] brace, is one kind of rigid lumbosacral orthosis. The manufacturer was Rehabilitation and Technical Aid Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.

Sponsors

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Patients eligible for the study were selected by an independent research assistant. The study was explained, and informed consent was obtained from patients before the surgery. Using a randomization sequence, the patients were assigned to the brace or no brace group.

Intervention model description

Patients in the brace group were instructed to wear a rigid brace (Knight-Taylor \[chairback\] brace) full-time for 12 weeks, except when bathing or lying in bed. Patients in the no brace group were instructed to wear a soft corset for 2 weeks, after which it was weaned off. All patients started wearing the brace or corset during their first ambulation out of bed following drainage tube removal after the surgery.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients underwent TLIF for degenerative lumbar disc disease, spinal stenosis, or spondylolisthesis

Exclusion criteria

* spinal fracture, spinal infection, spinal tumor, and a history of previous spinal surgery; and those who were lost to follow-up or failed to complete the questionnaires

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry Disability Index functional outcome6 months of postoperative follow-upVisual Analogue Scale score was patient reported pain scale. The 0 score is no any pain. THe 10 score is the most pain ever. THe more the score the worsen the pain . The Oswestry Disability Index score is the most common used score for lumbar spine disability score. This score had only 10 questions, and all of the questions are related to pain and daily activity. 0 score is no any disability or pain. 100 score is the worst.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
interbody fusion ratepostoperative 6 months follow-upuse CT scan to evaluate the bone union condition after interbody fusion of lumbar spine
complicationpostoperative 6 months follow-upany undesirable condition after spinal surgery
reoperationpostoperative 6 months follow-upany reoperation after primary spinal surgery

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026