Skip to content

Dupilumab As An Adjunct For Subcutaneous Grass Immunotherapy

A Study To Evaluate The Efficacy Of Dupilumab As An Adjunct For Subcutaneous Grass Immunotherapy To Reduce Provoked Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms Using The Nasal Allergen Challenge Model

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03558997
Enrollment
103
Registered
2018-06-15
Start date
2018-06-07
Completion date
2019-06-13
Last updated
2020-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allergic Rhinitis

Brief summary

The primary objective is to assess whether 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as an adjunct to Timothy Grass Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) improves upon the efficacy of Timothy Grass SCIT to reduce provoked allergic rhinitis symptoms, as measured by Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) with Timothy Grass extract at week 17. The secondary objectives of the study are: * To assess whether 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as compared to placebo reduces provoked allergic rhinitis symptoms, as measured by TNSS after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) with Timothy Grass extract * To assess whether 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as compared to dupilumab + SCIT reduces provoked allergic rhinitis symptoms, as measured by TNSS after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) with Timothy Grass extract * To assess changes in serum Timothy-grass-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), serum Timothy grass-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), and ratio of serum Timothy Grass-specific IgG4 to IgE over 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab + SCIT as compared to SCIT monotherapy * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as an adjunct to Timothy Grass SCIT

Interventions

DRUGDupilumab

Dupilumab was administered SC in a single-use, pre-filled glass syringe

DRUGTimothy Grass SCIT

Timothy grass extract was administered SC.

Placebo matching dupilumab was prepared in the same formulation without the addition of protein

DRUGPlacebo matching SCIT

Placebo matching SCIT was prepared in the same formulation (SCIT diluent) without the addition of Timothy grass extract

Sponsors

Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male and female participants aged 18 to 55 2. History of grass pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis 3. Grass pollen allergy confirmed by both: 1. Positive skin prick test (SPT) with Timothy Grass extract (mean wheal diameter at least ≥5 mm greater than a negative control) 2. Positive serum Timothy Grass-specific IgE (≥0.35KU/L) Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Significant rhinitis, sinusitis, outside of the grass pollen season 2. Any contraindications to SCIT (i.e, severe cardiovascular disease, malignancies, autoimmune disease, use of beta blocker, asthma severe enough to require chronic medication, acute infection) 3. Use of systemic corticosteroids within 4 weeks of screening visits or any NAC visits 4. Abnormal lung function as judged by the investigator 5. A clinical history of asthma requiring chronic medication such as regular inhaled corticosteroids for \>4 weeks per year 6. History of significant recurrent sinusitis, defined as 3 episodes per year for the last 2 years, all of which required antibiotic treatment 7. History of chronic sinusitis (with or without nasal polyps) 8. Tobacco smoking (ANY) within the last year Note: Other protocol defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) in Response to Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) at Week 17Baseline, Week 17TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing), each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17 in Placebo vs. DupilumabBaseline, Week 17TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT and placebo matched to dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT group in this outcome measure.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17Baseline, Week 17TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT and placebo matched to dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT.
Change From Baseline in TNSS Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17Baseline, Week 17TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of responses for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT group in this outcome measure.
Percent Change From Baseline in TNSS Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17Baseline, Week 17TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT group in this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Week 17Baseline, Week 17Measurement of Timothy Grass specific IgG4 was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing values were imputed by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.
Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17 in SCIT vs. Dupilumab + SCITBaseline, Week 17TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Week 17Baseline, Week 17Measurement of Timothy Grass specific sIgE was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Week 17Baseline, Week 17Measurement of Timothy Grass specific sIgE was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.
Change From Baseline in Log-Transformed Value of Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) Ratio to Week 17Baseline, Week 17Biomarkers measured in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsBaseline through Week 24Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study \[Week 24\]). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Week 17Baseline, Week 17Measurement of Timothy Grass specific IgG4 was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 214 participants were screened for study eligibility at 17 study sites in United States and Canada, of whom 103 were randomized to receive the study treatment. Screen failure was mostly due to inclusion criteria not met/exclusion criteria met.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who met the eligibility criteria were randomized in 1:1:1:1 ratio to 1 of 4 treatment groups: Placebo, Dupilumab, Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and Dupilumab + SCIT.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to Dupilumab and placebo matched to Timothy grass subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks. Both placebo doses were administered with a gap of 1 to 7 days.
25
Dupilumab
Participants received placebo matched to SCIT and subcutaneous (SC) injections of Dupilumab at a loading dose of 600 milligrams (mg) on Day 1, followed by a 300 mg for Q2W for 16 weeks. Both placebo matched to SCIT and Dupilumab doses were administered with a gap of 1 to 7 days.
26
SCIT
Participants received SCIT titrated up to a 4000 bioequivalent allergy unit (BAU) for 8 weeks followed by maintenance dose of 4000 BAU for following 8 weeks and SC injections of placebo matched to Dupilumab Q2W for 16 weeks. Both SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab doses were administered with a gap of 1 to 7 days.
26
Dupilumab + SCIT
Participants received SC injections of Dupilumab at a loading dose of 600 mg on Day 1, followed by 300 mg Q2W for 16 weeks and SCIT titrated up to 4000 BAU for 8 weeks followed by maintenance dose of 4000 BAU for following 8 weeks. Both SCIT and Dupilumab doses were administered with a gap of 1 to 7 days.
26
Total103

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0251
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0010
Overall StudyPhysician Decision0010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSCITPlaceboDupilumab + SCITTotalDupilumab
Age, Continuous37.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.25
34.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.05
33.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.58
36.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.22
40.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.19
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants3 Participants1 Participants11 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants21 Participants25 Participants91 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Log Transformed Timothy Grass Pollen IgG4 vs sIgE ratio-1.860 Ratio-1.970 Ratio-1.975 Ratio-1.840 Ratio-1.515 Ratio
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants9 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants12 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants20 Participants21 Participants76 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants10 Participants10 Participants50 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants15 Participants16 Participants53 Participants10 Participants
Timothy Grass Pollen IgG40.080 Miligram per Liter (mg/L)0.080 Miligram per Liter (mg/L)0.080 Miligram per Liter (mg/L)0.080 Miligram per Liter (mg/L)0.080 Miligram per Liter (mg/L)
Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE)10.300 Kilo Unit per Liter (kU/L)9.640 Kilo Unit per Liter (kU/L)11.250 Kilo Unit per Liter (kU/L)9.180 Kilo Unit per Liter (kU/L)4.810 Kilo Unit per Liter (kU/L)
Total nasal symptom score (TNSS) Area under Curve (AUC) [0-1 hour (hr)] at Baseline4.66 Score on a Scale*hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.987
5.34 Score on a Scale*hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.175
4.69 Score on a Scale*hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.72
4.93 Score on a Scale*hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.015
5.03 Score on a Scale*hour
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.193

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 260 / 260 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 2516 / 2623 / 2620 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 251 / 261 / 262 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) in Response to Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) at Week 17

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing), each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SCITPercent Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) in Response to Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) at Week 17-56.76 Percent ChangeStandard Error 9.687
Dupilumab + SCITPercent Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) in Response to Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) at Week 17-52.03 Percent ChangeStandard Error 8.462
p-value: 0.718595% CI: [-21.023, 30.487]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Log-Transformed Value of Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) Ratio to Week 17

Biomarkers measured in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SCITChange From Baseline in Log-Transformed Value of Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) Ratio to Week 170.745 Ratio
Dupilumab + SCITChange From Baseline in Log-Transformed Value of Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) Ratio to Week 171.720 Ratio
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.45, 1.27]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Week 17

Measurement of Timothy Grass specific sIgE was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SCITChange From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Week 176.460 Kilo Unit per Liter (kU/L)
Dupilumab + SCITChange From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Week 17-2.990 Kilo Unit per Liter (kU/L)
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-23.94, -8.36]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Week 17

Measurement of Timothy Grass specific IgG4 was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing values were imputed by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SCITChange From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Week 171.705 Milligram per Liter (mg/L)
Dupilumab + SCITChange From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Week 173.550 Milligram per Liter (mg/L)
p-value: 0.144995% CI: [-0.77, 3.21]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in TNSS Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of responses for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT group in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SCITChange From Baseline in TNSS Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17-1.83 Score on a Scale*hourStandard Error 0.329
Dupilumab + SCITChange From Baseline in TNSS Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17-2.77 Score on a Scale*hourStandard Error 0.321
p-value: 0.041495% CI: [-1.848, -0.037]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17 in Placebo vs. Dupilumab

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT and placebo matched to dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT group in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SCITChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17 in Placebo vs. Dupilumab-1.85 Score on a Scale*hourStandard Error 0.323
Dupilumab + SCITChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17 in Placebo vs. Dupilumab-1.83 Score on a Scale*hourStandard Error 0.329
p-value: 0.955995% CI: [-0.877, 0.928]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17 in SCIT vs. Dupilumab + SCIT

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SCITChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17 in SCIT vs. Dupilumab + SCIT-3.07 Score on a Scale*hourStandard Error 0.361
Dupilumab + SCITChange From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour After the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17 in SCIT vs. Dupilumab + SCIT-2.77 Score on a Scale*hourStandard Error 0.321
p-value: 0.543895% CI: [-0.661, 1.254]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study \[Week 24\]). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: The safety analysis set (SAF) included all randomized participants who received at least one injection of study drug, it was based on the treatment received (as treated).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SCITNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs21 Participants
SCITNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs1 Participants
Dupilumab + SCITNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs1 Participants
Dupilumab + SCITNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs18 Participants
SCITNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs24 Participants
SCITNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs1 Participants
Dupilumab + SCITNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with TEAEs22 Participants
Dupilumab + SCITNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsParticipants with Serious TEAEs2 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Week 17

Measurement of Timothy Grass specific sIgE was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SCITPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Week 1781.27 Percent Change
Dupilumab + SCITPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Week 17-56.44 Percent Change
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-205.51, -94.98]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Week 17

Measurement of Timothy Grass specific IgG4 was performed in serum or plasma to determine effects on biomarkers of relevant physiological and pathogenic processes. Data was for Dupilumab + SCIT and placebo matched to Dupilumab + SCIT monotherapy group in this outcome measure. Missing value was imputed by LOCF method for visits between post-baseline to Week 17.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SCITPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Week 171444.49 Percent Change
Dupilumab + SCITPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Timothy Grass Specific Immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) to Week 171896.25 Percent Change
p-value: 0.123195% CI: [-551.47, 1746.55]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in TNSS Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + SCIT and Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT group in this outcome measure.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SCITPercent Change From Baseline in TNSS Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17-21.57 Percent ChangeStandard Error 8.415
Dupilumab + SCITPercent Change From Baseline in TNSS Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17-52.03 Percent ChangeStandard Error 8.462
p-value: 0.010895% CI: [-53.874, -7.034]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17

TNSS was participant-reported composite symptom assessment of 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching & sneezing) each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = none, 3 = severe. TNSS total score was calculated as the sum of the response for all 4 individual nasal symptom scores and ranged from 0 to 12, where higher score indicated more severe symptoms. AUC of TNSS/component from time of the first observation to time of the last observation (AUC \[0-1 hr\]) was calculated by using the trapezoid rule. Data was reported for Dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT and placebo matched to dupilumab + placebo matched to SCIT.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 17

Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Efficacy analyses were based on the treatment allocated at randomization (as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
SCITPercent Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17-28.82 Percent ChangeStandard Error 8.427
Dupilumab + SCITPercent Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) Area Under Curve (AUC) Post Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) Over the First Hour of the Challenge (0-1 Hour (hr) Post Peak TNSS) at Week 17-21.57 Percent ChangeStandard Error 8.415
p-value: 0.541695% CI: [-16.028, 30.53]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026