Skip to content

Study of Quality of Life in Older vs. Younger Adult Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

A Multi-Center, Phase II Cross-sectional Study Investigating Quality of Life in Older vs. Younger Adult Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndromes: a Companion Study to the CIBMTR 10-CMSMDS-1-Approved Expanded Access Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03558386
Enrollment
92
Registered
2018-06-15
Start date
2018-07-23
Completion date
2019-11-15
Last updated
2020-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hematopoietic Cell Transplant, Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, Phase II, cross-sectional study comparing quality of life (QOL) as assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in older (≥65 years) adults vs younger (55-64 years) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Detailed description

Transplant recipients who have met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and from participating study sites will be asked to complete an online consent and survey for the study. This survey is the patient-reported outcomes survey and will be used to assess quality of life. The survey results will then be compared by age group and by time post transplant, between 6 months and a year post transplant, 1 year to 3 years post transplant, and 3 years or more post transplant.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALePRO survey

An electronic patient reported outcomes survey will be completed by the patient.

Sponsors

Medical College of Wisconsin
CollaboratorOTHER
Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate on this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria: 1. Underwent an allogeneic HCT for MDS on the 10-CMSMDS-1 protocol 2. Prior consent to research and future contact by the CIBMTR 3. Ability to provide RCI BMT protocol 17-ePRO signed and dated informed consent form (ICF) 4. Age ≥55 years at time of transplant 5. Fluent in English or Spanish 6. Greater than 6 months post-HCT

Exclusion criteria

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation on this study. 1. No access to an internet browser or email account 2. Within 6 months of first HCT for MDS on the 10-CMSMDS-1 protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Long-term post-HCT QOL (in particular physical function and fatigue) for transplant recipients ≥65 years old to those 55-64 years old.Those completing the assessment at one timepoint 6 months-1 year post-HCT, Those completing the assessment at one timepoint 1 year - 3 years post-HCT, Those completing the assessment at one timepoint Greater than 3 years post-HCTThe primary objective is to compare the change in long-term post-HCT QOL (in particular physical function and fatigue) for transplant recipients ≥65 years old to those 55-64 years old as measured by the assessment and when the assessment occurred at a post-HCT timepoint.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Domain-specific QOL scores by age group as assessed by PROMIS measures.6 months-1 year post-HCT, 1 year - 3 years post-HCT, 3 years+ post-HCT
To explore the feasibility of electronic PROs (ePRO) collection in recipients ≥65 years old and to compare their compliance to that in recipients 55-64, by evaluating completion rate of the assessment by subjects by age group.Those completing the assessment at one timepoint 6 months-1 year post-HCT, Those completing the assessment at one timepoint 1 year - 3 years post-HCT, Those completing the assessment at one timepoint Greater than 3 years post-HCT
To identify factors associated with poor compliance with reporting one-time single time ePRO measures in both age groups, by categorizing and quantifying reasons why subjects chose not to participate.Those completing the assessment at one timepoint 6 months-1 year post-HCT, Those completing the assessment at one timepoint 1 year - 3 years post-HCT, Those completing the assessment at one timepoint Greater than 3 years post-HCT

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026