Skip to content

Sensory Stimulation During CIMT

Sensory Stimulation During Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03558230
Enrollment
13
Registered
2018-06-15
Start date
2018-07-16
Completion date
2018-10-28
Last updated
2019-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

pediatric, hemiplegic, hand function

Brief summary

The long-term goal of this project is to assess the impact of the novel sensory stimulation technique in enhancing outcomes of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) in children with cerebral palsy. This is a pilot project.

Detailed description

The stimulation is peripheral sensory stimulation involving application of low-level, random-frequency vibration to the wrist skin. The hypothesis is that improvement in upper extremity function will be greater for the experimental group receiving the stimulation during CIMT compared with the control group who will wear the device with no vibration (placebo). This pilot study is to assess feasibility and safety.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALStandardized Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

The standardized Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy aims to improve the child's weak upper extremity through intensive frequent and repetitive movements. The therapy duration is 6 hours/day for 5 consecutive days.

BEHAVIORALVibration

Vibration applied to the wrist.

No vibration applied to the wrist.

Sponsors

Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

A double-blinded stratified randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 9 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Between the ages of 3 and 9 * Have unilateral upper limb motor weakness. * Use the affected extremity as a gross assist during play and self-care activities. * No significant developmental delays that would limit spontaneous use of the more affected extremity. * Be ambulatory for their age and demonstrate intact balance and protective reactions throughout the less involved upper extremity. * No other health impairment other than hemiparesis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility (Total Number of Hours That Participants Wear the Device)through 5-day study completion.total number of hours that participants wear the device

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vibration
The experimental group will receive the wrist stimulation during standardized Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Standardized Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: The standardized Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy aims to improve the child's weak upper extremity through intensive frequent and repetitive movements. The therapy duration is 6 hours/day for 5 consecutive days. Vibration: Vibration applied to the wrist. The vibration device is a generic, commercially-available, vibrator, not particularly used for this peripheral skin stimulation purpose.
7
No Vibration
The control group will wear the vibration device with no vibration during standardized Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Standardized Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: The standardized Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy aims to improve the child's weak upper extremity through intensive frequent and repetitive movements. The therapy duration is 6 hours/day for 5 consecutive days. Placebo (for vibration): No vibration applied to the wrist. The vibration device is a generic, commercially-available, vibrator, not particularly used for this peripheral skin stimulation purpose.
6
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNo VibrationTotalVibration
Age, Continuous5.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
5.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
5.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 71 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility (Total Number of Hours That Participants Wear the Device)

total number of hours that participants wear the device

Time frame: through 5-day study completion.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VibrationFeasibility (Total Number of Hours That Participants Wear the Device)28.3 HoursStandard Deviation 0.3
No VibrationFeasibility (Total Number of Hours That Participants Wear the Device)27.9 HoursStandard Deviation 1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026