Skip to content

Transdisciplinary Versus Usual Care for Type1 Diabetes in Adolescence

Transdisciplinary Versus Usual Care for Type 1 Diabetes in Adolescence

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03557151
Enrollment
230
Registered
2018-06-14
Start date
2018-07-13
Completion date
2022-03-31
Last updated
2022-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

This study will consist of a randomized controlled trial to test a novel Transdisciplinary Care (TC) model of delivery of care for type 1 diabetes in adolescence. Adolescents and their parents/caregivers (n=150) will be randomized to Usual Care or TC care in a 1:2 ratio. Approximately half of those in TC care will received TC in person and half will receive it through telehealth. TC visits will consist of conjoint management of T1D by a TC team consisting of an Advanced Practice Nurse, Dietitian and Psychologist who will see parent-adolescent dyads together within the same visit. TC team members have trained each other in their respective disciplines. Outcome measures include glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) and questionnaires assessing diabetes self management behaviors. Other ancillary/exploratory measures are also completed.

Detailed description

Large epidemiologic studies show that \<25% of adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) achieve targeted glycohemoglobin levels advocated by the American Diabetes Association (\< 7.5%) or International Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (\< 7.0%). Optimal self-management of T1D requires daily insulin replacement by multiple injections or insulin pump, 4-6 daily blood glucose checks, regulation of carbohydrate intake and physical activity, prevention/correction of glycemic fluctuations and perhaps use of a continuous glucose monitor. This regimen places pervasive affective, behavioral, cognitive and social demands on adolescents with T1D and their families and psychosocial variables greatly impact their success in T1D self-care. Struggling with maintaining adequate glycemic control is essentially normative among adolescents, suggesting that conventional systems of care are not meeting the needs of this population. A substantial, growing literature provides an evidence base for psychosocial screening and behavioral intervention strategies targeting improved coping with the demands of T1D, but this evidence base has not penetrated fully into routine T1D care. Rigorous integration of this evidence into routine care for T1D could yield many benefits. Behavioral barriers to effective care are major concerns of all stakeholders, but conventional care is not well-equipped to address these issues. Concomitantly, the supply of board-certified pediatric endocrinologists is not keeping pace with growth of the T1D patient population, amplifying the need to validate alternative delivery systems that multiply the effective workforce of T1D health professionals. We will develop and test a novel Transdisciplinary Care (TC) approach (conjoint TC visits conducted by an Advanced Practice Nurse, Psychology Postdoctoral Fellow and Dietitian) to improve adolescents' T1D outcomes and justify a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT). In Year 1, crowdsourcing methods will engage youths with T1D, parents and health care providers (HCP) in planning a feasible, acceptable, safe and effective TC model that addresses youths' and families' psychosocial needs and capitalizes on the expertise of advanced practice nurses co-managing T1D with psychologists and dietitians. The Wallander et al. stress and coping model and the D'Zurilla and Goldfried problem solving model provide a sound conceptual framework for the TC model of care. The TC team will learn each discipline's skills in T1D management, develop a detailed TC manual to guide this work and others' future studies, see adolescents and parents together as a team, screen for potentially modifiable psychological impediments to T1D care, and promote families' coping resources by enhancing family-centered communication and problem solving, implementing empirically validated behavioral interventions and facilitating additional appropriate services for complex problems. Telehealth delivery of TC care carries several potential advantages, justifying its inclusion within a RCT comparing the effects of UC to TC delivered via various modalities on glycemic control and treatment adherence (primary outcomes) as well as quality of life and other psychosocial variables (exploratory outcomes). Qualitative and economic analyses will follow the RCT, providing perspectives on mechanisms of TC effects and its sustainability. Mixed qualitative and quantitative methods will validate an innovative model of T1D care for adolescents that could then be tested in a future definitive, multi-site RCT. We will address these specific aims: SPECIFIC AIM 1. In Year 1, with methods used effectively in our ongoing DP3 study of parents of children \<6 years old with T1D, we will engage separate crowds of adolescents with T1D, parents, and HCPs in planning/refining a feasible, safe, acceptable and efficacious Trans-Disciplinary care model (TC) for T1D in adolescence. This crowdsourcing effort should yield a TC model that meets the needs of all key stakeholder groups, ensuring its feasibility, acceptance and efficacy. SPECIFIC AIM 2. With study oversight by a diverse stakeholder panel and guided by a detailed intervention manual, 150 families of adolescents treated for T1D at Nemours practices in the Delaware Valley or Florida will participate in a rigorous Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in years 2 and 3. The RCT will compare Usual Care (UC) with Trans-Disciplinary Care on glycohemoglobin (HbA1C), treatment adherence, along with exploratory outcomes including health care use, T1D-related distress, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction. Delivery mode of Trans-Disciplinary Care will also be explored (e.g., Face-to-Face, Telehealth, Combined). The proposed trial will yield substantial information that could justify a definitive future test of this model, inform methodological planning for subsequent studies, and explore whether certain modes of delivery (e.g., Telehealth) are justified for evaluation in future trials. SPECIFIC AIM 3. Qualitative interviews of adolescents, parents, and health care providers completed at the midpoint and end of the RCT will identify possible mediators or moderators of TC efficacy and guide refinements to the TC model. We will interview third party payers about the feasibility of dissemination of the TC model into practice and collect health care cost data. These analyses will strengthen the justification for a future, larger trial of TC, and guide refinements to the TC model to further enhance its efficacy.

Interventions

OTHERUsual Care

Usual Care participants will receive the same excellent multidisciplinary Care they would receive at the same center were they not enrolled in the trial. In clinic visits scheduled at approximately 3-month intervals, they will see subspecialty board certified or eligible pediatric endocrinologists, supplemented as needed with involvement of certified diabetes educators, dietitians, social workers or psychologists. HbA1c target is \< 7.5% with no severe hypoglycemia and acceptable quality of life. About half are expected to be on insulin pumps and carbohydrate counting, while the great majority of others are following basal-bolus multiple daily injection regimens, also based on carbohydrate counting. A rising proportion of patients use continuous glucose monitors and this trend is likely to accelerate during the study.

BEHAVIORALTransdisciplinary Care-In Person & Telehealth

TC participants will receive all elements of the Usual Care intervention but they will do so in the context of face to face or telehealth delivery of TC follow-up visits with simultaneous involvement of an advanced practice nurse, dietitian and psychologist at each visit.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Nemours Children's Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Persons completing data scoring and entry tasks will be kept blinded to a given participant's treatment assignment. Most scoring is automated via the REDCap platform.

Intervention model description

The study design randomizes participants to standard care or transdisciplinary care delivered through various modalities (in person; telehealth). Data collection occurs at 5 Time Points (0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adolescents: * Age \> 11 years but \< 17 years at time of consent * Diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes with duration of \> 1 year * Most recent HbA1C or mean HbA1C over the prior year 7.5-10.0%, inclusive * Has had at least one clinic visit for T1D at a Nemours Children's Clinic within the past year * Is not currently participating in any other research in which treatment adherence or glycemic control are study outcomes * No T1D clinic visits in the preceding 12 months in which two or more care providers saw the patient together * Is not on daily oral glucocorticoid treatment * Is considered developmentally normal by the treating clinician (not in a self- contained special education classroom or been retained in 2 or more grades) * Is able to read/comprehend study questionnaires in English * Is not currently undergoing treatment for a coincident medical condition that, in the opinion of the treating physician, represents a contraindication to study participation * Family must be able to access the internet Parents: * Is either a biological parent or legally appointed caregiver of the child * Is the primary diabetes caregiver of the child: and at least weekly involvement in T1D care * Routinely accompanies child for diabetes care at Nemours * Is willing to schedule T1D clinic visits at a specific available location in Orlando or Wilmington * Capable of participating in conversations in English during medical visits * Anticipates continued medical care for T1D at Nemours for a year following study enrollment * Is able to read/comprehend study questionnaires and decision aids in English * Does not have an open abuse/neglect case with any child protection agency over the prior 3 years * There is no evidence of frequent changes in the adolescent's household or living arrangements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)baseline (enrollment; visit 1), 3 months (start of intervention; visit 2), 6 months (visit 3), 9 months (visit 4), 12 months (end of study; visit 5)HbA1c expressed as percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Formbaseline (enrollment; visit 1); 6 months (visit 3); 12 months (end of study, visit 5)This 24 item measure assesses self-care behaviors that typify current T1D care. It is completed by the adolescent with T1D. Total scores are being used and range from 0 to 84 with higher scores indicating better adherence. In previous work, the scale had an internal consistency coefficient of .79 and a mean correlation of .48 with HbA1C.
Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Reportbaseline (enrollment; visit 1); 6 months (visit 3); 12 months (end of study, visit 5)This 24 item parent-report measure parallels the youth self report measure and assesses self-care behaviors that typify current T1D care. The total scores is being reported with possible scores ranging from 0 to 84. Higher scores indicate better adherence to T1D care. In past work parent and youth reports have correlated at .63.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent ReportBaseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 monthsThis 14 item brief version of the scale measures problems, hassles, and distress related to diabetes and diabetes care. Respondents rate each item on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problems). Scores range from 14 to 84 with higher scores indicating more diabetes-related problems.
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver ReportBaseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months (end of study)This caregiver-report measure assesses caregiver quality of life related to their child's diabetes. Raw scores are standardized to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver ReportBaseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 monthsThis 15 item brief version of the scale measures problems, hassles, and distress related to diabetes and diabetes care. Respondents rate each item on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problems). Scores range from 15 to 90 with higher scores indicating more diabetes-related problems.
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self ReportBaseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months (end of study)This measure assesses the adolescent's diabetes-related quality of life. Raw scores are converted to standardized scores that can range from 1 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Adolescents with T1D and their caregiver were recruited and randomized as a dyad. 115 dyads (families) enrolled in the study

Pre-assignment details

After enrollment, participants were required to complete baseline measures prior to randomization. A total of 11 families (22 participants) did not complete baseline measures and were not randomized to condition.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care
Usual Care includes the multidisciplinary health care, education and supports that are routinely available to Nemours families of youth with T1D. This includes clinic visits approximately every 3 months with a pediatric endocrinologist or advanced practice nurse, with referrals to a certified diabetes educator, dietitian, social worker or psychologist as deemed clinically necessary by that HCP.
74
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)
Transdisciplinary Care includes all elements of Usual Care, but quarterly T1D visits are co-managed by an APN, RD and a Psychologist who provide care to the adolescent and parent(s) as a team during each visit. A central TC feature is active incorporation of evidence-based psychosocial care for T1D into visits including motivational interviewing techniques, systematic problem solving, and the facilitation of family communication to address each family's self-identified T1D challenges. TC visits will include interaction with all three team members jointly, with subsequent interaction between the parent/youth or both with a subset of this team as decided by family and team consensus during the visit.
134
Total208

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
6 to 9 Monthsmoved out of state/discontinued care at Nemours20
9 to 12 Months (End of Study)moved out of state/discontinued care at Nemours02
Randomization to 3 MonthsLost to Follow-up22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual CareTransdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Total
Age, Continuous
Adolescents
13.88 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77
14.07 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.74
14.01 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75
Age, Continuous
Caregivers of adolescents
42.61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.89
42.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.06
42.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.97
Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report55.20 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
53.68 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.97
54.23 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.98
Diabetes Self Management Profile - Youth Self Report53.87 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.33
52.37 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.39
52.92 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants11 Participants19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants54 Participants83 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants11 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Not Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants55 Participants86 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
HbA1c8.52 percentage glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19
8.87 percentage glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26
8.74 percentage glycosylated hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.24
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents
Black or African American
5 Participants13 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents
More than one race
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Adolescents
White
23 Participants43 Participants66 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers of adolescents
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers of adolescents
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers of adolescents
Black or African American
5 Participants13 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers of adolescents
More than one race
1 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers of adolescents
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers of adolescents
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers of adolescents
White
26 Participants43 Participants69 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Adolescents
Female
19 Participants36 Participants55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Adolescents
Male
18 Participants31 Participants49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers of adolescents
Female
33 Participants58 Participants91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers of adolescents
Male
4 Participants8 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 370 / 67
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 3726 / 67
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 377 / 67

Outcome results

Primary

Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

HbA1c expressed as percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin

Time frame: baseline (enrollment; visit 1), 3 months (start of intervention; visit 2), 6 months (visit 3), 9 months (visit 4), 12 months (end of study; visit 5)

Population: These values are derived from blood work on the adolescent patients and represent all available raw data. HbA1c data were not available at all timepoints due to missed clinical visits and/or unreturned blood spot kits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareGlycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)3 months8.59 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.56
Usual CareGlycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)6 months8.71 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.41
Usual CareGlycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)9 months8.59 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.66
Usual CareGlycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)12 months8.45 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.21
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)12 months8.97 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.66
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)3 months9.02 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.5
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)9 months8.98 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.27
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)6 months9.03 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 1.58
Comparison: Transdisciplinary Care is being compared to Usual Care using the Time 2 HbA1c (as baseline) and Time 5 HbA1c (as the outcome) controlling for race/ethnicity, gender, and age of the patient. The interaction of condition and time is used to evaluate the treatment effect. Missing data were not imputed.p-value: 0.89595% CI: [-0.68, 0.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report

This 24 item parent-report measure parallels the youth self report measure and assesses self-care behaviors that typify current T1D care. The total scores is being reported with possible scores ranging from 0 to 84. Higher scores indicate better adherence to T1D care. In past work parent and youth reports have correlated at .63.

Time frame: baseline (enrollment; visit 1); 6 months (visit 3); 12 months (end of study, visit 5)

Population: These are raw data. Discrepancies in participant numbers are due to missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareDiabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report6 month assessment53.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.39
Usual CareDiabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report12 month assessment52.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report6 month assessment54.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.27
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report12 month assessment55.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.72
Comparison: TC is being compared to UC using baseline and 12 month data and controlling for patient age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The interaction between condition and time is used to evaluate the treatment effect. Missing data are not imputed.p-value: 0.0795% CI: [-0.32, 8.53]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Diabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form

This 24 item measure assesses self-care behaviors that typify current T1D care. It is completed by the adolescent with T1D. Total scores are being used and range from 0 to 84 with higher scores indicating better adherence. In previous work, the scale had an internal consistency coefficient of .79 and a mean correlation of .48 with HbA1C.

Time frame: baseline (enrollment; visit 1); 6 months (visit 3); 12 months (end of study, visit 5)

Population: These are raw data from all adolescent participants providing data. Decrements in the number of participants are due to missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareDiabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form6 month assessment53.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.55
Usual CareDiabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form12 month assessment53.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.61
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Diabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form6 month assessment55.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.86
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Diabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form12 month assessment55.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.09
Comparison: TC is being compared to UC using baseline and 12 month data, controlling for patient age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The interaction between condition and time is used to examine the treatment effect. Missing data were not imputed.p-value: 0.3395% CI: [-2.29, 6.88]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report

This 14 item brief version of the scale measures problems, hassles, and distress related to diabetes and diabetes care. Respondents rate each item on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problems). Scores range from 14 to 84 with higher scores indicating more diabetes-related problems.

Time frame: Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months

Population: This adolescent-report measure was only completed by the adolescents taking part in the study (not caregivers). The data reported below are raw data (not imputed) and the discrepancies in the number of subjects are due to missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareProblem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent ReportBaseline38.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.88
Usual CareProblem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report6 months39.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.01
Usual CareProblem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report12 months (end of study)37.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.16
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent ReportBaseline35.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.45
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report6 months30.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.97
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report12 months (end of study)30.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.78
Comparison: This analysis included baseline and 12-month data. The interaction of condition (TC or UC) and time was used to examine the treatment effect. Child sex, age, and race/ethnicity were covariates. Missing data were not imputed.p-value: 0.52795% CI: [-9.77, 5]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report

This 15 item brief version of the scale measures problems, hassles, and distress related to diabetes and diabetes care. Respondents rate each item on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problems). Scores range from 15 to 90 with higher scores indicating more diabetes-related problems.

Time frame: Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months

Population: This caregiver-report measure was completed only by the caregiver participants in the study. Raw data are reported. Any deviations from the expected number of subjects is due to missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareProblem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver ReportBaseline52.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
Usual CareProblem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report6 months54.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Usual CareProblem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report12 months53.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.91
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver ReportBaseline44.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.73
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report6 months43.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.44
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report12 months42.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.16
Comparison: This analysis uses baseline and 12 month data. The interaction of condition and time is used to evaluate the treatment effect. Child sex, age, and race/ethnicity were used as covariates. Missing data were not imputed.p-value: 0.25395% CI: [-8.94, 2.35]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report

This caregiver-report measure assesses caregiver quality of life related to their child's diabetes. Raw scores are standardized to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months (end of study)

Population: This caregiver-report measure was only completed by caregiver participants. Raw data is presented. Any deviations in the number of subjects across time points is due to missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareType 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver ReportBaseline55.97 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Usual CareType 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report12 months55.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Usual CareType 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report6 months56.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report6 months66.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.54
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report12 months66.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver ReportBaseline65.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.74
Comparison: This analysis uses baseline and 12-month data. The interaction between condition and time is used to evaluate the treatment effect. Child age, sex, and race/ethnicity were covariates. Missing data were not imputed.p-value: 0.8395% CI: [-3.62, 4.35]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report

This measure assesses the adolescent's diabetes-related quality of life. Raw scores are converted to standardized scores that can range from 1 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months (end of study)

Population: This youth-report measure was completed only by adolescent participants. Raw data are reported below. Any deviations in sample size are due to missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareType 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self ReportBaseline61.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.62
Usual CareType 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report6 months57.85 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.81
Usual CareType 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report12 months57.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.04
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self ReportBaseline61.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.21
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report6 months67.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.74
Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth)Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report12 months67.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.71
Comparison: This analysis included baseline and 12 month data. The condition by time interaction was used to evaluate the treatment effect. Child age, sex, and race/ethnicity were included as covariates. Missing data were not imputed.p-value: 0.0195% CI: [2.31, 17.08]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026