Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Conditions
Brief summary
This study will consist of a randomized controlled trial to test a novel Transdisciplinary Care (TC) model of delivery of care for type 1 diabetes in adolescence. Adolescents and their parents/caregivers (n=150) will be randomized to Usual Care or TC care in a 1:2 ratio. Approximately half of those in TC care will received TC in person and half will receive it through telehealth. TC visits will consist of conjoint management of T1D by a TC team consisting of an Advanced Practice Nurse, Dietitian and Psychologist who will see parent-adolescent dyads together within the same visit. TC team members have trained each other in their respective disciplines. Outcome measures include glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) and questionnaires assessing diabetes self management behaviors. Other ancillary/exploratory measures are also completed.
Detailed description
Large epidemiologic studies show that \<25% of adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) achieve targeted glycohemoglobin levels advocated by the American Diabetes Association (\< 7.5%) or International Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (\< 7.0%). Optimal self-management of T1D requires daily insulin replacement by multiple injections or insulin pump, 4-6 daily blood glucose checks, regulation of carbohydrate intake and physical activity, prevention/correction of glycemic fluctuations and perhaps use of a continuous glucose monitor. This regimen places pervasive affective, behavioral, cognitive and social demands on adolescents with T1D and their families and psychosocial variables greatly impact their success in T1D self-care. Struggling with maintaining adequate glycemic control is essentially normative among adolescents, suggesting that conventional systems of care are not meeting the needs of this population. A substantial, growing literature provides an evidence base for psychosocial screening and behavioral intervention strategies targeting improved coping with the demands of T1D, but this evidence base has not penetrated fully into routine T1D care. Rigorous integration of this evidence into routine care for T1D could yield many benefits. Behavioral barriers to effective care are major concerns of all stakeholders, but conventional care is not well-equipped to address these issues. Concomitantly, the supply of board-certified pediatric endocrinologists is not keeping pace with growth of the T1D patient population, amplifying the need to validate alternative delivery systems that multiply the effective workforce of T1D health professionals. We will develop and test a novel Transdisciplinary Care (TC) approach (conjoint TC visits conducted by an Advanced Practice Nurse, Psychology Postdoctoral Fellow and Dietitian) to improve adolescents' T1D outcomes and justify a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT). In Year 1, crowdsourcing methods will engage youths with T1D, parents and health care providers (HCP) in planning a feasible, acceptable, safe and effective TC model that addresses youths' and families' psychosocial needs and capitalizes on the expertise of advanced practice nurses co-managing T1D with psychologists and dietitians. The Wallander et al. stress and coping model and the D'Zurilla and Goldfried problem solving model provide a sound conceptual framework for the TC model of care. The TC team will learn each discipline's skills in T1D management, develop a detailed TC manual to guide this work and others' future studies, see adolescents and parents together as a team, screen for potentially modifiable psychological impediments to T1D care, and promote families' coping resources by enhancing family-centered communication and problem solving, implementing empirically validated behavioral interventions and facilitating additional appropriate services for complex problems. Telehealth delivery of TC care carries several potential advantages, justifying its inclusion within a RCT comparing the effects of UC to TC delivered via various modalities on glycemic control and treatment adherence (primary outcomes) as well as quality of life and other psychosocial variables (exploratory outcomes). Qualitative and economic analyses will follow the RCT, providing perspectives on mechanisms of TC effects and its sustainability. Mixed qualitative and quantitative methods will validate an innovative model of T1D care for adolescents that could then be tested in a future definitive, multi-site RCT. We will address these specific aims: SPECIFIC AIM 1. In Year 1, with methods used effectively in our ongoing DP3 study of parents of children \<6 years old with T1D, we will engage separate crowds of adolescents with T1D, parents, and HCPs in planning/refining a feasible, safe, acceptable and efficacious Trans-Disciplinary care model (TC) for T1D in adolescence. This crowdsourcing effort should yield a TC model that meets the needs of all key stakeholder groups, ensuring its feasibility, acceptance and efficacy. SPECIFIC AIM 2. With study oversight by a diverse stakeholder panel and guided by a detailed intervention manual, 150 families of adolescents treated for T1D at Nemours practices in the Delaware Valley or Florida will participate in a rigorous Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in years 2 and 3. The RCT will compare Usual Care (UC) with Trans-Disciplinary Care on glycohemoglobin (HbA1C), treatment adherence, along with exploratory outcomes including health care use, T1D-related distress, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction. Delivery mode of Trans-Disciplinary Care will also be explored (e.g., Face-to-Face, Telehealth, Combined). The proposed trial will yield substantial information that could justify a definitive future test of this model, inform methodological planning for subsequent studies, and explore whether certain modes of delivery (e.g., Telehealth) are justified for evaluation in future trials. SPECIFIC AIM 3. Qualitative interviews of adolescents, parents, and health care providers completed at the midpoint and end of the RCT will identify possible mediators or moderators of TC efficacy and guide refinements to the TC model. We will interview third party payers about the feasibility of dissemination of the TC model into practice and collect health care cost data. These analyses will strengthen the justification for a future, larger trial of TC, and guide refinements to the TC model to further enhance its efficacy.
Interventions
Usual Care participants will receive the same excellent multidisciplinary Care they would receive at the same center were they not enrolled in the trial. In clinic visits scheduled at approximately 3-month intervals, they will see subspecialty board certified or eligible pediatric endocrinologists, supplemented as needed with involvement of certified diabetes educators, dietitians, social workers or psychologists. HbA1c target is \< 7.5% with no severe hypoglycemia and acceptable quality of life. About half are expected to be on insulin pumps and carbohydrate counting, while the great majority of others are following basal-bolus multiple daily injection regimens, also based on carbohydrate counting. A rising proportion of patients use continuous glucose monitors and this trend is likely to accelerate during the study.
TC participants will receive all elements of the Usual Care intervention but they will do so in the context of face to face or telehealth delivery of TC follow-up visits with simultaneous involvement of an advanced practice nurse, dietitian and psychologist at each visit.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Persons completing data scoring and entry tasks will be kept blinded to a given participant's treatment assignment. Most scoring is automated via the REDCap platform.
Intervention model description
The study design randomizes participants to standard care or transdisciplinary care delivered through various modalities (in person; telehealth). Data collection occurs at 5 Time Points (0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months).
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Adolescents: * Age \> 11 years but \< 17 years at time of consent * Diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes with duration of \> 1 year * Most recent HbA1C or mean HbA1C over the prior year 7.5-10.0%, inclusive * Has had at least one clinic visit for T1D at a Nemours Children's Clinic within the past year * Is not currently participating in any other research in which treatment adherence or glycemic control are study outcomes * No T1D clinic visits in the preceding 12 months in which two or more care providers saw the patient together * Is not on daily oral glucocorticoid treatment * Is considered developmentally normal by the treating clinician (not in a self- contained special education classroom or been retained in 2 or more grades) * Is able to read/comprehend study questionnaires in English * Is not currently undergoing treatment for a coincident medical condition that, in the opinion of the treating physician, represents a contraindication to study participation * Family must be able to access the internet Parents: * Is either a biological parent or legally appointed caregiver of the child * Is the primary diabetes caregiver of the child: and at least weekly involvement in T1D care * Routinely accompanies child for diabetes care at Nemours * Is willing to schedule T1D clinic visits at a specific available location in Orlando or Wilmington * Capable of participating in conversations in English during medical visits * Anticipates continued medical care for T1D at Nemours for a year following study enrollment * Is able to read/comprehend study questionnaires and decision aids in English * Does not have an open abuse/neglect case with any child protection agency over the prior 3 years * There is no evidence of frequent changes in the adolescent's household or living arrangements
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | baseline (enrollment; visit 1), 3 months (start of intervention; visit 2), 6 months (visit 3), 9 months (visit 4), 12 months (end of study; visit 5) | HbA1c expressed as percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form | baseline (enrollment; visit 1); 6 months (visit 3); 12 months (end of study, visit 5) | This 24 item measure assesses self-care behaviors that typify current T1D care. It is completed by the adolescent with T1D. Total scores are being used and range from 0 to 84 with higher scores indicating better adherence. In previous work, the scale had an internal consistency coefficient of .79 and a mean correlation of .48 with HbA1C. |
| Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report | baseline (enrollment; visit 1); 6 months (visit 3); 12 months (end of study, visit 5) | This 24 item parent-report measure parallels the youth self report measure and assesses self-care behaviors that typify current T1D care. The total scores is being reported with possible scores ranging from 0 to 84. Higher scores indicate better adherence to T1D care. In past work parent and youth reports have correlated at .63. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report | Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months | This 14 item brief version of the scale measures problems, hassles, and distress related to diabetes and diabetes care. Respondents rate each item on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problems). Scores range from 14 to 84 with higher scores indicating more diabetes-related problems. |
| Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report | Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months (end of study) | This caregiver-report measure assesses caregiver quality of life related to their child's diabetes. Raw scores are standardized to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. |
| Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report | Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months | This 15 item brief version of the scale measures problems, hassles, and distress related to diabetes and diabetes care. Respondents rate each item on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problems). Scores range from 15 to 90 with higher scores indicating more diabetes-related problems. |
| Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report | Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months (end of study) | This measure assesses the adolescent's diabetes-related quality of life. Raw scores are converted to standardized scores that can range from 1 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater quality of life. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Adolescents with T1D and their caregiver were recruited and randomized as a dyad. 115 dyads (families) enrolled in the study
Pre-assignment details
After enrollment, participants were required to complete baseline measures prior to randomization. A total of 11 families (22 participants) did not complete baseline measures and were not randomized to condition.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Usual Care Usual Care includes the multidisciplinary health care, education and supports that are routinely available to Nemours families of youth with T1D. This includes clinic visits approximately every 3 months with a pediatric endocrinologist or advanced practice nurse, with referrals to a certified diabetes educator, dietitian, social worker or psychologist as deemed clinically necessary by that HCP. | 74 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) Transdisciplinary Care includes all elements of Usual Care, but quarterly T1D visits are co-managed by an APN, RD and a Psychologist who provide care to the adolescent and parent(s) as a team during each visit. A central TC feature is active incorporation of evidence-based psychosocial care for T1D into visits including motivational interviewing techniques, systematic problem solving, and the facilitation of family communication to address each family's self-identified T1D challenges. TC visits will include interaction with all three team members jointly, with subsequent interaction between the parent/youth or both with a subset of this team as decided by family and team consensus during the visit. | 134 |
| Total | 208 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 to 9 Months | moved out of state/discontinued care at Nemours | 2 | 0 |
| 9 to 12 Months (End of Study) | moved out of state/discontinued care at Nemours | 0 | 2 |
| Randomization to 3 Months | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Usual Care | Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous Adolescents | 13.88 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.77 | 14.07 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.74 | 14.01 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.75 |
| Age, Continuous Caregivers of adolescents | 42.61 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.89 | 42.98 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.06 | 42.85 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.97 |
| Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report | 55.20 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 | 53.68 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.97 | 54.23 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.98 |
| Diabetes Self Management Profile - Youth Self Report | 53.87 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.33 | 52.37 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.39 | 52.92 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Adolescents Hispanic or Latino | 8 Participants | 11 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Adolescents Not Hispanic or Latino | 29 Participants | 54 Participants | 83 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Adolescents Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Caregivers Hispanic or Latino | 6 Participants | 11 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Caregivers Not Hispanic or Latino | 31 Participants | 55 Participants | 86 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Caregivers Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| HbA1c | 8.52 percentage glycosylated hemoglobin STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19 | 8.87 percentage glycosylated hemoglobin STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26 | 8.74 percentage glycosylated hemoglobin STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.24 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Adolescents American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Adolescents Asian | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Adolescents Black or African American | 5 Participants | 13 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Adolescents More than one race | 5 Participants | 7 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Adolescents Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Adolescents Unknown or Not Reported | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Adolescents White | 23 Participants | 43 Participants | 66 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers of adolescents American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers of adolescents Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers of adolescents Black or African American | 5 Participants | 13 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers of adolescents More than one race | 1 Participants | 6 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers of adolescents Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers of adolescents Unknown or Not Reported | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Caregivers of adolescents White | 26 Participants | 43 Participants | 69 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Adolescents Female | 19 Participants | 36 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Adolescents Male | 18 Participants | 31 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Caregivers of adolescents Female | 33 Participants | 58 Participants | 91 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Caregivers of adolescents Male | 4 Participants | 8 Participants | 12 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 37 | 0 / 67 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 18 / 37 | 26 / 67 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 37 | 7 / 67 |
Outcome results
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
HbA1c expressed as percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Time frame: baseline (enrollment; visit 1), 3 months (start of intervention; visit 2), 6 months (visit 3), 9 months (visit 4), 12 months (end of study; visit 5)
Population: These values are derived from blood work on the adolescent patients and represent all available raw data. HbA1c data were not available at all timepoints due to missed clinical visits and/or unreturned blood spot kits.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | 3 months | 8.59 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin | Standard Deviation 1.56 |
| Usual Care | Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | 6 months | 8.71 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin | Standard Deviation 1.41 |
| Usual Care | Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | 9 months | 8.59 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin | Standard Deviation 1.66 |
| Usual Care | Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | 12 months | 8.45 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin | Standard Deviation 1.21 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | 12 months | 8.97 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin | Standard Deviation 1.66 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | 3 months | 9.02 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | 9 months | 8.98 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin | Standard Deviation 1.27 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | 6 months | 9.03 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin | Standard Deviation 1.58 |
Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report
This 24 item parent-report measure parallels the youth self report measure and assesses self-care behaviors that typify current T1D care. The total scores is being reported with possible scores ranging from 0 to 84. Higher scores indicate better adherence to T1D care. In past work parent and youth reports have correlated at .63.
Time frame: baseline (enrollment; visit 1); 6 months (visit 3); 12 months (end of study, visit 5)
Population: These are raw data. Discrepancies in participant numbers are due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report | 6 month assessment | 53.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.39 |
| Usual Care | Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report | 12 month assessment | 52.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report | 6 month assessment | 54.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.27 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Diabetes Self Management Profile - Parent Proxy Report | 12 month assessment | 55.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.72 |
Diabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form
This 24 item measure assesses self-care behaviors that typify current T1D care. It is completed by the adolescent with T1D. Total scores are being used and range from 0 to 84 with higher scores indicating better adherence. In previous work, the scale had an internal consistency coefficient of .79 and a mean correlation of .48 with HbA1C.
Time frame: baseline (enrollment; visit 1); 6 months (visit 3); 12 months (end of study, visit 5)
Population: These are raw data from all adolescent participants providing data. Decrements in the number of participants are due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Diabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form | 6 month assessment | 53.45 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.55 |
| Usual Care | Diabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form | 12 month assessment | 53.97 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.61 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Diabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form | 6 month assessment | 55.99 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.86 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Diabetes Self Management Profile-Self Report Form | 12 month assessment | 55.09 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.09 |
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report
This 14 item brief version of the scale measures problems, hassles, and distress related to diabetes and diabetes care. Respondents rate each item on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problems). Scores range from 14 to 84 with higher scores indicating more diabetes-related problems.
Time frame: Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months
Population: This adolescent-report measure was only completed by the adolescents taking part in the study (not caregivers). The data reported below are raw data (not imputed) and the discrepancies in the number of subjects are due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report | Baseline | 38.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.88 |
| Usual Care | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report | 6 months | 39.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.01 |
| Usual Care | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report | 12 months (end of study) | 37.12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.16 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report | Baseline | 35.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.45 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report | 6 months | 30.12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.97 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Adolescent Report | 12 months (end of study) | 30.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.78 |
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report
This 15 item brief version of the scale measures problems, hassles, and distress related to diabetes and diabetes care. Respondents rate each item on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not a problem) to 6 (serious problems). Scores range from 15 to 90 with higher scores indicating more diabetes-related problems.
Time frame: Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months
Population: This caregiver-report measure was completed only by the caregiver participants in the study. Raw data are reported. Any deviations from the expected number of subjects is due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report | Baseline | 52.85 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.4 |
| Usual Care | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report | 6 months | 54.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| Usual Care | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report | 12 months | 53.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.91 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report | Baseline | 44.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.73 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report | 6 months | 43.24 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.44 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale - Caregiver Report | 12 months | 42.15 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.16 |
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report
This caregiver-report measure assesses caregiver quality of life related to their child's diabetes. Raw scores are standardized to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months (end of study)
Population: This caregiver-report measure was only completed by caregiver participants. Raw data is presented. Any deviations in the number of subjects across time points is due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report | Baseline | 55.97 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Usual Care | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report | 12 months | 55.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
| Usual Care | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report | 6 months | 56.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.1 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report | 6 months | 66.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.54 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report | 12 months | 66.32 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) Scale - Caregiver Report | Baseline | 65.64 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.74 |
Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report
This measure assesses the adolescent's diabetes-related quality of life. Raw scores are converted to standardized scores that can range from 1 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline (upon enrollment); 6 months; 12 months (end of study)
Population: This youth-report measure was completed only by adolescent participants. Raw data are reported below. Any deviations in sample size are due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report | Baseline | 61.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.62 |
| Usual Care | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report | 6 months | 57.85 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.81 |
| Usual Care | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report | 12 months | 57.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.04 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report | Baseline | 61.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.21 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report | 6 months | 67.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.74 |
| Transdisciplinary Care (In Person or Telehealth) | Type 1 Diabetes and Life (T1DAL) - Youth Self Report | 12 months | 67.66 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.71 |