Skip to content

Social Value Training in Toddlers With Elevated Autism Symptoms

Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Social Value Training in Toddlers With Elevated Autism Symptoms

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03556826
Acronym
SVT
Enrollment
3
Registered
2018-06-14
Start date
2019-12-13
Completion date
2020-03-03
Last updated
2023-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Brief summary

In the proposed pilot study, ASD+ toddlers will undergo Social Value Training (SVT) using a gaze-contingent eye-tracking paradigm in toddlers with elevated symptoms of ASD (ASD+) (n=48). SVT will be administered over a two-day period and the training effects will be assessed by changes in visual attention to high-value (HV) faces as compared to low-value (LV) faces between baseline, post-baseline, and a follow-up assessment using two tasks: a laboratory selective attention (LSA) task and real-world selective attention (RWSA) task. The investigators will also evaluate acceptability and feasibility of the value training and contribution of sex, nonverbal developmental level, and severity of autism symptoms to response to the training.

Detailed description

One of the markers of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in infants and toddlers is impaired selective attention to faces. This impairment diminishes their ability to learn from and interact adaptively with others in real-world environments. Attentional selection in the social domain relies, in part, on one's ability to encode reward values of people and store these values in long-term memory as stable values. The 'stable' values (henceforth, 'values') are learned over the course of repeated learning opportunities, and once acquired, they are signaled rapidly, preferentially directing gaze to encoded faces of importance (high-value, HV) based on their hedonic or informative properties in the past. Automatic responses based on values stored in long-term memory are essential for survival when decisions have to be made rapidly (e.g., mother versus stranger). Learning about values is subserved by the reward learning system in the brain involving basal ganglia (BG) circuitry. This circuitry is implicated in the pathophysiology of ASD and extant evidence suggests that individuals with ASD exhibit specific impairments in learning the reward value of social stimuli such as faces. Based on this evidence, the investigators propose that limited attention to faces in toddlers with elevated autism symptoms (ASD+) is, in part, driven by impaired value learning in the social domain, affecting their ability to rapidly and preferentially select HV faces and ignore low-value (LV) faces in the complex real-world environment. Consequently, they exhibit diminished spontaneous attention to faces in general, and when they look at faces, they may distribute their limited attentional resources between high- (e.g., mother or therapist) and low-value (stranger) individuals in a trial-and-error fashion. The investigators further hypothesize that reinforcing attention of children with ASD+ toward specific faces through social value training (SVT) will increase their attention to these faces in real-world environments. In the proposed pilot study, ASD+ toddlers will undergo Social Value Training (SVT) using a gaze-contingent eye-tracking paradigm in toddlers with elevated symptoms of ASD (ASD+) (n=48). SVT will be administered over a two-day period and the training effects will be assessed by changes in visual attention to high-value (HV) faces as compared to low-value (LV) faces between baseline, post-baseline, and a follow-up assessment using two tasks: a laboratory selective attention (LSA) task and real-world selective attention (RWSA) task. The investigators will also evaluate acceptability and feasibility of the value training and contribution of sex, nonverbal developmental level, and severity of autism symptoms to response to the training. Study was hindered by Covid and masking, therefore primary and secondary outcomes were unable to be collected as intended.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSocial Value Learning Training

For each child, two faces will be assigned the high-value (HV) status and the other two the low-value (LV) status. Value status will be randomized between the faces and children and all four faces will have the same probability of being assigned HV or LV across all participants. A gaze fixation on a HV face will always activate a dynamic display and the face will smile brightly. A gaze fixation on a LV face will always result in no change to its display.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Months to 21 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Singleton pregnancy * Gestational age of 37-42 weeks * Appropriate weight for gestational age * Presence of an older full biological sibling with ASD * Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 (ADOS-2) score at 18 months in the clinical range (calibrated severity score \>3)

Exclusion criteria

* Congenital infections * Non-febrile seizure disorder * Hearing loss * Visual impairment * Presence of any known chromosomal abnormality or congenital infection * Prenatal exposure to illicit drugs * Major psychotic disorder in first degree relatives.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of looking at faces during the laboratory and real-world testsAverage trial duration: for laboratory task: 2 seconds, for real-world task: 1 minuteThe proportion of time spent attending to faces assigned HV and LV, standardized by the amount of valid eye-tracking data collected during the trial

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of looking at the scene during laboratory and real-world testsAverage trial duration: for laboratory task: 2 seconds, for real-world task: 1 minuteThe proportion of valid eye tracking time collected during test trials standardized over the test trials duration

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026