Skip to content

Active Workplace Study

Active Workplace Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03556670
Enrollment
264
Registered
2018-06-14
Start date
2018-07-10
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2020-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Behavior, Occupational Exposure, Safety Issues, Sedentary Lifestyle

Brief summary

Exposure to sedentary work is an occupational hazard with significant health and safety consequences. Sedentary behavior is an independent predictor of heart disease, diabetes, early mortality, and accounts for the majority of the increase in obesity in the US. Prolonged sitting, common in modern sedentary work environments, contributes to increases in musculoskeletal pain, injuries, and detrimental changes in physiological functioning. Call center employees, who are among the most sedentary workers in the US, area priority population for Total Worker Health interventions. This project is designed to substantially improve health, safety, and well-being in call center employees, including physiological outcomes that contribute to chronic diseases.The study tests whether a Total Worker Health oriented intervention is more effective than usual practices for increasing the utilization of health and safety resources and improving worker health and safety. Study results will have implications for over 30 million sedentary workers in the US.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how a Total Worker Health intervention targeting sedentary behavior among call center employees improves the health, safety, and well-being of sedentary workers. Our primary hypothesis is that a multilevel integrated intervention that follows the Total Worker Health approach will have a stronger impact on primary outcomes (sedentary time and light physical activity at work, musculoskeletal pain, time lost due to injury or illness) compared to a control condition that matches typical worksite practices. To test our hypothesis, we will 1) tailor Total Worker Health intervention components to the call center environment, 2) determine the effects of a 6-month intervention, and 3) measure the durability of intervention effects at 12-month follow-up. The study will use a randomized control trial design with two conditions: a control condition and a Total Worker Health intervention condition that includes organizational and individual intervention components. Study participants will include employees and supervisors from up to eight call centers. The call centers will be randomly assigned to the two conditions prior to the start of the study. During the study, we will conduct a baseline assessment; implement a six-month intervention; conduct a post-intervention assessment; and conduct a follow-up assessment at twelve months. During each assessment period, study participants in both conditions will complete a survey, physical measures, hemoglobin A1c measurement, and seven days of physical activity data collection with accelerometers. Study participants in both conditions could additionally be asked to complete a measurement for endothelial function during each assessment. The baseline assessment will occur directly after participant enrollment and consent at each worksite. Both conditions will be given access to portable pedal stands. The intervention condition will have additional environmental alterations including hanging signs throughout the work environment that promote health and safety behaviors; and replacing high calorie and high sugar food and drink options in vending machines and break rooms with fresh fruits, vegetables, and other healthier choices. Participants in the intervention condition will begin intervention activities. Intervention activities that participants could be asked to complete include: computer based training, goal setting and behavioral self-monitoring, scripted team-based health and safety discussions, and team competitions with pedal stands. Supervisor participants could additionally be asked to complete additional computer based training, goal setting and behavioral self-monitoring of supportive behaviors, and inter-supervisor observations. Participants in the control condition will receive no additional support beyond the provision of pedal stands. Repeated measures will be collected at baseline, six months, and 12 months. Our primary hypotheses are that the intervention condition will produce greater reductions in sedentary behavior, increases in light physical activity, and reductions in musculoskeletal pain and sick day use than the control condition. To test these hypotheses, we will employ an intent-to-treat strategy using generalized estimating equations in order to use all available data to evaluate group differences in the magnitude of change over time in primary outcomes. The effect of interest for each outcome will be the interaction of condition X time. We will statistically control for confounders by measuring a wide range of demographic and psychological variables that could impact study outcomes. We will test for baseline differences between conditions on these variables using one-way ANOVAs (continuous variables) or chi-squares tests (categorical variables). Variables that differ significantly between groups at baseline will be included as covariates in the generalized estimating equation models of intervention effects over time.

Interventions

OTHERControl

Usual practice control

BEHAVIORALTotal Worker Health

The intervention combines organizational and individual level strategies. Participants will be given access to pedal stands, health and safety messaging, and other environmental modifications. Intervention activities that participants could be asked to complete include: computer based training, goal setting and behavioral self-monitoring, scripted team-based health and safety discussions, and team competitions with pedal stands. Supervisor participants could additionally be asked to complete additional computer based training, goal setting and behavioral self-monitoring of supportive behaviors, and inter-supervisor observations. The intervention is six-months in duration.

Sponsors

Portland State University
CollaboratorOTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will be aware that they're part of a study, but will be masked as to whether their worksite is an intervention or control site.

Intervention model description

There are two study conditions: intervention and control. Organizations will be randomized to conditions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * Currently working in a participating organization

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sedentary behaviorChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsSedentary behavior at work measured via accelerometry

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body weightChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsDirectly measured body weight
Percent body fatChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsDirectly measured percent body fat via bioelectric impedence
Blood pressureChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsDirect measurement
Resting heart rateChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsDirect measurement
Hemoglobin A1cChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsDirect measurement with Siemens DCA Vantage Analyzer
Endothelial functioningChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsDirect measurement with EndoPat software and hardware
Depression symptomsChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsCES-D Short Form Scale
Job StressChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsStress in General Scale
Work Family ConflictChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsWork Family Conflict Scale
General Life StressChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsPerceived Stress Scale
Job satisfactionChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsMichigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire job satisfaction scale
Global HealthChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsPROMIS Global Health Scale
HeightBaseline, 6-months, and 12-monthsHeight
Dietary behaviorsChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsFrequency of high-calorie food and drink consumption
Physical Activity surveyChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsHealthy Physical Activity Scale
Sleep QualityChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Sleep DistrubanceChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsPROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale
Sleep ImpairmentChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsPROMIS Sleep Impairment Scale
Safety climateChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsSafety Climate Scale
Musculoskeletal painChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsSurvey measure of musculoskeletal pain (Nordic Musculoskeletal Symptoms Questionnaire)
Lost work timeChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsSick days, tardiness, time lost due to injury and illness, and other work absences
Physical activity accelerometerChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsPhysical activity measured via accelerometry
Occupational SittingChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsOccupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire
Job Turnover IntentionsChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsJob Turnover Intentions Scale
Lost Work TimeChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsDays missed at work due to illness and injury
Support at workChange from baseline at 6 months and 12 monthsSurvey measure of perceived support from supervisors at work

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026