Health Care Utilization, Youth Incarceration
Conditions
Brief summary
A vicious cycle exists between adolescent substance use disorders and youth incarceration. Re-wiring adolescent social networks during community reentry after incarceration can potentially break the cycle of adolescent substance use and youth incarceration. Social networks influence adolescent substance use and delinquent behavior, yet little is known about how to intervene on social networks to improve health. Community reentry is a key opportunity to re-set youths' social networks and re-direct high-risk youth toward a healthier, more supportive network that can foster drug abstinence and reduce recidivism. The investigators hypothesize that an adult who has successfully navigated reentry can guide youth to rewire their social network by encouraging pro-social relationships, troubleshooting basic barriers to healthcare and social services, and helping create linkages to substance use and mental health treatment services. The goal of this study is to measure the impact of a pilot intervention to address two key barriers to accessing behavioral health treatment among recently incarcerated youth: poor care coordination and need for more positive support from the social network. The proposed study intervention, the Whole Person Care (WPC) Reentry Program, is based on the successful adult Transitions Clinic model, and is being adapted for delivery to transition age youth (TAY) by community partners in the Los Angeles County justice system. WPC community health workers (coaches) will provide recently released inmates a formerly incarcerated adult role model who provides care coordination and social support to facilitate access to needed health services, and who actively intervenes to guide TAY youth toward pro-social peers and adults. The investigators propose a pilot longitudinal study of WPC, using a community-partnered participatory research approach. The primary outcome will be reductions in adolescent substance use in response to the intervention (Aim 1). Secondary outcomes will test whether the intervention increases receipt of behavioral health services, decreases recidivism and mental health symptoms, and improves school and work engagement (Aim 2). Finally, the investigators will examine social networks as a potential mechanism by measuring whether youth receiving the intervention report healthier social networks (lower proportion of peers engaging in risky behaviors and a higher number of supportive adults) than control youth (Aim 3).
Detailed description
A vicious cycle exists between adolescent substance use disorders (SUD) and youth incarceration. Untreated SUD, often comorbid with mental health problems, contribute substantially to youth incarceration. Among 51,000 US youth detained annually, 50-88% have SUD. Incarceration itself can exacerbate existing mental health disorders and contribute to future substance use. Following incarceration, reentry back into the community of peers and adults is a challenging juncture and a high risk period for re-engaging in substance use. Finally, relapse on substance use leads to recidivism. Within 3 years of release, 75% of adolescents are re-arrested, with highest risk among youth with SUD. Re-wiring adolescent social networks during reentry can potentially break the vicious cycle of adolescent substance use and youth incarceration. Social networks powerfully influence adolescent substance use and delinquent behavior, yet little is known about how to intervene on social networks to improve health. In the investigators prior research, the investigators found that incarcerated youth value relationships with supportive adults and peers who can help them succeed in school and stay out of trouble. Most express plans to stay clean from drugs and stay away from peers who encourage substance use and delinquent behaviors. Yet, during reentry, many youth re-engage with their previous network of risky peers. Why? The investigators have found that upon reentry, youth who lack sufficient social supports and positive role models default back to previous risky social networks, reinforcing further substance use and other risky behaviors. Community reentry is a key opportunity to re-set social networks and re-direct high-risk youth toward a healthier network that can foster drug abstinence and reduce recidivism. Having an available and supportive adult role model can be transformative for youth after incarceration. The investigators hypothesize that an adult who has successfully navigated reentry can actively guide youth to re-wire their social network by encouraging pro-social relationships, troubleshooting basic barriers to healthcare and social services, and creating linkages to SUD and mental health services, to disrupt the viscous cycle. This community-partnered study seeks to measure the impact of an innovative pilot intervention, the Whole Person Care (WPC) Reentry Program, a network community health worker (i.e. coach) intervention that addresses two key challenges for recently incarcerated transition age youth (TAY): poor care coordination in the behavioral health cascade and need for more positive support from the social network. Los Angeles (LA) County has the largest adult and juvenile justice systems in the US and has implemented the WPC Reentry Program to enhance linkages to community behavioral health services. WPC is based on the successful Transitions Clinic model, an intervention with demonstrated efficacy in linking recently incarcerated adults to needed healthcare and improving health outcomes. The model has yet to be implemented for reentry TAY, but has the potential to be transformative at the critical developmental stage of adolescence, when peer social networks are highly dynamic and youth behaviors can affect lifelong trajectories. WPC community health workers will receive formalized training modeled after the adult Transitions Clinic approach and will serve as a formerly incarcerated adult role model who provides care coordination and social support to facilitate access to needed behavioral health services. Tailored for reentry youth, WPC will also include a social network component whereby coaches are trained to actively guide youth toward pro-social peers and adults. Dr. Barnert has been working closely with LA County and this study capitalizes on a unique opportunity to rigorously study WPC. The investigators hypothesize that (1) WPC will reduce adolescent SUD and recidivism and (2) WPC will demonstrate positive associations with other key markers of healthy reentry (e.g., improved mental health). The investigators further hypothesize that shifts towards healthier social networks will mediate these relationships, a potential mechanism the investigators will test. The investigators propose a pilot longitudinal study of WPC, using a community-partnered, participatory research approach. Specific aims are to: 1. Measure the impact of the WPC network coach intervention targeting recently incarcerated youth on decreasing rates of 30-day use and risky use of marijuana, alcohol, and other drug use. 2. Test whether the WPC network coach intervention decreases recidivism, increases receipt of behavioral health services, improves mental health, and enhances school and work engagement. 3. Examine whether recently incarcerated youth receiving the WPC intervention report healthier social networks (lower proportion of peers engaging in risky behaviors and a higher number of supportive adults) than those not receiving the intervention.
Interventions
Social network intervention to provide care coordination and social support during youth reentry before release and post-release from jail.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
for youth exiting the adult justice system: * Recipient of WPC pre-release reentry intervention (determined by Los Angeles County) * Ages 18-24 * Fluent in English or Spanish
Exclusion criteria
for youth exiting the adult justice system: * Not receiving WPC pre-release reentry intervention (determined by Los Angeles County) * Severe cognitive delay * Unable to complete surveys in English or Spanish
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Marijuana Use | 3 months post-release | Self-reported frequency of past-month (30-day) marijuana use |
| Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Alcohol Use | 3 months post-release | Self-reported frequency of past-month (30-day) alcohol use |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recidivism | 3 months post-release | Re-arrest since release (self-report and administrative/probation data) |
| Receipt of Behavioral Health Services | 3 months post-release | receipt of behavioral since release (self-report and verified by administrative/probation data) |
| Mental Health | 3 months post release | self-reported presence of diagnosis of a mental health disorder (will be verified by administrative/probation data) |
| Substance Use Disorders | 3 months post release | self-reported presence or diagnosis of substance use disorder at follow-up (will be verified by administrative/probation data) |
| Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Marijuana Use | 9 months post release | Self-reported frequency of past-month (30-day) marijuana use |
| Delinquency | 3 months post release | number of arrest since release (will be verified by administrative/probation data) |
| Attitudes Towards WPC Reentry Intervention (WPC Reentry Participant Response Tool) | 3 months post release | Liked intervention; recommend to a friend. Assessed via WPC Reentry Participant Response Tool. Includes 3 items, assessed via 7-point Likert scale. |
| Psychiatric Hospitalizations | 3 months post release | psychiatric hospitalizations since release (self-report and health records data) |
| Medications | 3 months post release | self-reported medication or prescription at follow-up (will be verified by administrative/probation data) |
| Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Alcohol Use | 9 months post release | Self-reported frequency of past-month (30-day) alcohol use |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Whole Person Care (WPC) Reentry Program In partnership with LA County Health Agency, Dr. Barnert is adapting the successful Transitions Clinic model developed for reentry adults, to assist recently incarcerated transition age youth link to needed health services and reduce substance use disorder relapse and recidivism. This adaption is informed by Dr. Barnert's prior research on the needs of incarcerated adolescents. The intervention, called the Whole Person Care (WPC) Reentry Program will consist of community health workers (i.e. network coaches) who are formerly incarcerated and formally trained in care coordination and social network coaching, who interact with justice-involved transition age youth pre- and post-release to increase youths' engagement in community SUD and mental health services. Participants in this branch will include youth exiting the adult justice system (ages 18-24).
Whole Person Care (WPC) Reentry Program: Social network intervention to provide care coordination and social support during youth reentry. | 0 |
| Control Participants in the control arm will receive usual care reentry healthcare planning post-release, including correctional health provider and court-referred SUD and mental health treatment recommendations, medication prescriptions, written instructions for reinstating Medicaid, and written health discharge summaries. Participants in this branch will include youth exiting the adult justice system (ages 18-24) and youth exiting the juvenile justice system (ages 16-18). | 19 |
| Total | 19 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Control | Whole Person Care (WPC) Reentry Program |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30-day Alcohol Use | 13.1 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 | 13.1 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 | — |
| 30-day Marijuana Use | 22.9 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 | 22.9 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 | — |
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 19 Participants | 19 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 22 years | 22 years | — |
| Arrest History | 10.4 arrests STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8 | 10.4 arrests STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8 | — |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 9 Participants | 9 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 10 Participants | 10 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Medications | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | — |
| Mental Health | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 10 Participants | 10 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 19 participants | 19 participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 19 Participants | 19 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Substance Use Disorder | 13 Participants | 13 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 0 | 0 / 19 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 19 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 | 0 / 19 |
Outcome results
Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Alcohol Use
Self-reported frequency of past-month (30-day) alcohol use
Time frame: 3 months post-release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Alcohol Use | 2 days | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Marijuana Use
Self-reported frequency of past-month (30-day) marijuana use
Time frame: 3 months post-release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Marijuana Use | 7.4 days | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
Attitudes Towards WPC Reentry Intervention (WPC Reentry Participant Response Tool)
Liked intervention; recommend to a friend. Assessed via WPC Reentry Participant Response Tool. Includes 3 items, assessed via 7-point Likert scale.
Time frame: 3 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study. This question asked about the intervention and was therefore skipped for participants in the control arm
Attitudes Towards WPC Reentry Intervention (WPC Reentry Participant Response Tool)
Liked intervention; recommend to a friend. Assessed via WPC Reentry Participant Response Tool. Includes 3 items, assessed via 7-point Likert scale.
Time frame: 9 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study. This question asked about the intervention and was therefore skipped for participants in the control arm
Delinquency
number of arrest since last survey (will be verified by administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 9 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Delinquency | 0.2 arrests | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Delinquency
number of arrest since release (will be verified by administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 3 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Delinquency | 0.6 arrests | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Alcohol Use
Self-reported frequency of past-month (30-day) alcohol use
Time frame: 9 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Alcohol Use | 2 days | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Marijuana Use
Self-reported frequency of past-month (30-day) marijuana use
Time frame: 9 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Frequency of Past-month (30-day) Marijuana Use | 10 days | Standard Deviation 11.8 |
Medications
self-reported medication or prescription at follow-up (will be verified by administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 9 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Medications | 1 Participants |
Medications
self-reported medication or prescription at follow-up (will be verified by administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 3 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Medications | 4 Participants |
Mental Health
self-reported presence of diagnosis of a mental health disorder (will be verified by administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 3 months post release
Population: No participants were in the treatment group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Whole Person Care (WPC) Reentry Program - Post-Release | Mental Health | 0 Participants |
| Control | Mental Health | 2 Participants |
Mental Health
self-reported presence of diagnosis of a mental health disorder at follow-up (will be verified by administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 9 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Mental Health | 1 Participants |
Psychiatric Hospitalizations
psychiatric hospitalizations since last survey (self-report and health records data)
Time frame: 9 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Psychiatric Hospitalizations | 0 Participants |
Psychiatric Hospitalizations
psychiatric hospitalizations since release (self-report and health records data)
Time frame: 3 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Psychiatric Hospitalizations | 1 Participants |
Receipt of Behavioral Health Services
receipt of behavioral since last survey (self-report and verified by administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 9 months post-release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Receipt of Behavioral Health Services | 5 Participants |
Receipt of Behavioral Health Services
receipt of behavioral since release (self-report and verified by administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 3 months post-release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Receipt of Behavioral Health Services | 7 Participants |
Recidivism
Re-arrest since last survey (self-report and administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 9 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Recidivism | 0.2 arrests | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Recidivism
Re-arrest since release (self-report and administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 3 months post-release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Recidivism | 0.6 arrests | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
Substance Use Disorders
self-reported presence or diagnosis of substance use disorder at follow-up (will be verified by administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 3 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Substance Use Disorders | 1 Participants |
Substance Use Disorders
self-reported presence or diagnosis of substance use disorder at follow-up (will be verified by administrative/probation data)
Time frame: 9 months post release
Population: No participants were in the intervention arm of the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Substance Use Disorders | 0 Participants |