Evaluation of the HARM for the Detection of a Cerebral Ischemia in TIA/TNA Patients

Evaluation of the Hyperintense Acute Reperfusion Marker for the Detection of a Cerebral Ischemia in the Anterior and Posterior Circulation in Patients With Transient Ischemic/Neurological Attack

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03555643

Enrollment

Registered

2018-06-13

Start date

2017-11-01

Completion date

2021-10-31

Last updated

2024-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diagnoses Disease, Ischemia, Stroke, TIA

Keywords

TIA, Stroke, Ischemia, MRI, FLAIR, hyperintense acute reperfusion marker

Brief summary

The research project investigates the incidence of the hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or transient neurological attack (TNA). Initially, HARM was described after acute ischemic stroke and is caused by a blood-brain barrier disorder after recanalization of an acute vessel occlusion and consecutive reperfusion. These result in a contrast agent extravasation into the subarachnoid space, which can be easily detected on fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. TIA is defined as a transient focal neurological deficit with a probably cerebrovascular cause. In contrast, TNA is defined as a transient non-focal neurological deficit with multiple causes, including cerebrovascular. The clinical diagnosis of TIA is often flawed and the delineation of TIA and TNA can be difficult. MRI is the most important diagnostic method for the detection or exclusion of cerebral ischemia in patients with TIA/TNA in daily clinical practice. However, on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) approximately two-thirds of TIA cases and only one-fifth of TNA cases demonstrate acute cerebral ischemia. Supplementary perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) scans can only slightly increase this percentage. The well-known HARM could prove to be complementary to DWI and PWI and close or at least reduce the existing gap. In the case of TNA in particular, this could be of clinical relevance in order to avoid mistreatment or even dismissal without further clarification after supposedly inconspicuous imaging. Therefore, the aim of this study is to record the incidence of HARM in a statistically significant number of cases of patients with TIA and TNA and to investigate relationships with symptom duration and anatomical localization. In addition, the dynamics of contrast enhancement in the subarachnoid space in TIA and TNA cases with HARM will be analyzed in detail.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

COHORT

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

50 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* transient focal neurological symptoms (aphasia, facial paresis, hemiparesis, hemihypaesthesia, double vision, hemianopia, hemiataxia, etc.) * transient non-focal neurological symptoms (confusion, dizziness, memory deficits, gait insecurity, bilateral weakness, etc.) * MRI examination possible within 24 hours of symptoms * able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* persistent symptoms * symptoms lasting more than \> 24 h * clinical suspicion of other cause of symptoms (seizures, intoxication, hypoglycemia, psychogenic) * contraindications for MRI (pacemaker, metallic splinter, cochlear implants, etc.) * unable to give consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM)	within 24 hours after onset of symptoms	Detection of the hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) on postcontrast FLAIR images.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results