Skip to content

Association Between Food/Nutrient Intake and Sleep Quality in Middle Aged and Older Population

Association Between Food/Nutrient Intake and Sleep Quality in Middle Aged and Older Population

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03554954
Enrollment
108
Registered
2018-06-13
Start date
2018-08-02
Completion date
2019-10-31
Last updated
2020-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sleep

Keywords

Nutrients, Diet, Sleep Quality, Middle-aged adults, Older adults

Brief summary

Sleep is essential to health. Quality of sleep, measure through indexes of sleep, is related to the incidence of obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and premature death. Sleep pattern changes as people age. They tend to have a harder time falling asleep and more trouble staying asleep than when they were younger. Studies have shown that food/nutrient intake may be associated with sleep duration, quality, and patterns. Singapore's population is aging rapidly and improving their indexes of sleep may result in their health promotion.

Detailed description

Sleep is essential to health and indexes of sleep including duration, quality, and patterning are related to the incidence of chronic diseases and premature death. Changes in sleep patterns are a part of the aging process and as people age, they tend to have a harder time falling asleep and more trouble staying asleep than when they were younger. Certain cross-sectional studies have shown that food/nutrient intake may be associated with sleep duration, quality, and patterns. In the last decade, Singapore's population has grown older. However, limited research examined the association between food/nutrient intake and indexes of sleep in middle-aged and older population in Singapore. Therefore, with a growing number of elderly, studies on improving their sleep quality can play a significant role in improving their quality of life. This is a cross-sectional study and subjects require a 1-day visit (one time visit ONLY). Generally healthy middle-aged and older population will be recruited and after the phone screening and validated subjects will complete the medical history questionnaire and to be brought on the day of visit. During the visit, subjects will stay approximately 3-h to complete the testing. After completing the consent form, fasting-state blood collection and general health assessment will be conducted. Then subjects will be asked to complete the questionnaires to assess sleep quality and dietary intake.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National University of Singapore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

1. Ability to give an informed consent 2. Age 50 to 75 years 3. Not taking dietary supplements which may impact the outcome of the interests (I.e. dietary protein and vitamin supplements) 4. Not having significant dietary changes for the past 1 year (i.e. weight loss, vegetarian diet) 5. Having sufficient venous access to allow the blood collection 6. Willing to follow the study procedure

Exclusion criteria

1. Unable to give an informed consent 2. Age \< 50 years 3. Taking dietary supplements which may impact the outcome of the interest (i.e. dietary proteins and vitamin supplements) 4. Having/had significant dietary changes for the past 1 year 5. Not having sufficient venous access to allow the blood collection 6. Unwilling to follow the study procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Efficiency)Day 1Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) Sleep efficiency (%)
Sleep Quality Assessment 1 (GSS)Day 1Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) Global Sleep Score (GSS): 0-21 (arbitrary unit; au) A lower value indicates better sleep quality
Sleep Quality Assessment 2Day 1Sleep evaluation questionnaire Score: 0-56 (arbitrary unit) Lower score suggests better sleep
Dietary AssessmentDay 1Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ)
Dietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Carotenoids)Day 33 Day 24-Hr Dietary Recall: Participants will be given a diagram showing serving sizes that they can refer to for measurements. Only 3 out of the 7 days of the week are required for the participants to record their food intake. Results are reported as the average value of the analysed nutrients (dietary carotenoids) across the 3 days the dietary data was collected.
Blood Amino Acid Concentration (Plasma Tryptophan)Day 1Amino acid analysis on collected blood serum for blood amino acid profile.
Dietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)Day 33 Day 24-Hr Dietary Recall: Participants will be given a diagram showing serving sizes that they can refer to for measurements. Only 3 out of the 7 days of the week are required for the participants to record their food intake. Results are reported as the average value of the analysed nutrients (dietary fat) across the 3 days the dietary data was collected.
Sleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Duration)Day 1Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) Sleep duration (hours)
Sleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Latency)Day 1Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) Sleep latency (minutes)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anthropometric Measurements 1Day 1Height (kg)
Anthropometric Measurements 2Day 1Weight (kg)
Anthropometric Measurements 3Day 1Waist circumference (cm)
Skin Carotenoid StatusDay 1Measure with resonance Raman spectroscopy. A higher score is indicative of raised skin carotenoid levels and hence, a better outcome
Perceived Stress AssessmentDay 1Perceived stress assessment (PSS) questionnaire Score: 0-40 (arbitrary unit; au) A higher score indicates higher perceived stress
Blood Lipid and Glucose ProfileDay 1Plasma triglycerides, total cholesterol, ldl-cholesterol, hdl-cholesterol and glucose concentration
Plasma Carotenoids ConcentrationDay 1High performance liquid chromatography quantitative analyses of carotenoids in plasma samples
Blood PressureDay 1Blood pressure using electronic devices that work on the oscillometric technique. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure are both collected and reported

Countries

Singapore

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Association Between Food/Nutrient Intake and Sleep Quality
This is a cross-sectional study and it does not have an arm/group
108
Total108

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAssociation Between Food/Nutrient Intake and Sleep Quality
Age, Continuous58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Caucasian
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Chinese
94 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Indian
6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Malaysian
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Others
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 108
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 108
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 108

Outcome results

Primary

Blood Amino Acid Concentration (Plasma Tryptophan)

Amino acid analysis on collected blood serum for blood amino acid profile.

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualityBlood Amino Acid Concentration (Plasma Tryptophan)21.6 nmol/mLStandard Deviation 9.2
Poor Sleep QualityBlood Amino Acid Concentration (Plasma Tryptophan)24.7 nmol/mLStandard Deviation 11.3
Overall DataBlood Amino Acid Concentration (Plasma Tryptophan)22.8 nmol/mLStandard Deviation 10.1
Primary

Dietary Assessment

Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ)

Time frame: Day 1

Primary

Dietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Carotenoids)

3 Day 24-Hr Dietary Recall: Participants will be given a diagram showing serving sizes that they can refer to for measurements. Only 3 out of the 7 days of the week are required for the participants to record their food intake. Results are reported as the average value of the analysed nutrients (dietary carotenoids) across the 3 days the dietary data was collected.

Time frame: Day 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualityDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Carotenoids)11.6 mgStandard Deviation 8.8
Poor Sleep QualityDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Carotenoids)8.8 mgStandard Deviation 6.7
Overall DataDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Carotenoids)10.5 mgStandard Deviation 8.1
Primary

Dietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)

3 Day 24-Hr Dietary Recall: Participants will be given a diagram showing serving sizes that they can refer to for measurements. Only 3 out of the 7 days of the week are required for the participants to record their food intake. Results are reported as the average value of the analysed nutrients (dietary fat) across the 3 days the dietary data was collected.

Time frame: Day 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualityDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)Total Fat34.3 percentage of energy intakeStandard Deviation 6.4
Good Sleep QualityDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)Total Carbohydrate47.3 percentage of energy intakeStandard Deviation 6.8
Good Sleep QualityDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)Total Protein18.4 percentage of energy intakeStandard Deviation 4
Poor Sleep QualityDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)Total Fat32.8 percentage of energy intakeStandard Deviation 7
Poor Sleep QualityDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)Total Protein19.1 percentage of energy intakeStandard Deviation 4.2
Poor Sleep QualityDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)Total Carbohydrate48.1 percentage of energy intakeStandard Deviation 8.7
Overall DataDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)Total Carbohydrate47.6 percentage of energy intakeStandard Deviation 7.5
Overall DataDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)Total Protein18.7 percentage of energy intakeStandard Deviation 4.1
Overall DataDietary Assessment 2 (Dietary Macronutrients)Total Fat33.7 percentage of energy intakeStandard Deviation 6.6
Primary

Sleep Quality Assessment 1 (GSS)

Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) Global Sleep Score (GSS): 0-21 (arbitrary unit; au) A lower value indicates better sleep quality

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualitySleep Quality Assessment 1 (GSS)3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Poor Sleep QualitySleep Quality Assessment 1 (GSS)8.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Overall DataSleep Quality Assessment 1 (GSS)5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Primary

Sleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Duration)

Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) Sleep duration (hours)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualitySleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Duration)6.7 hoursStandard Deviation 1.1
Poor Sleep QualitySleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Duration)6.2 hoursStandard Deviation 1.3
Overall DataSleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Duration)6.5 hoursStandard Deviation 1.2
Primary

Sleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Efficiency)

Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) Sleep efficiency (%)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualitySleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Efficiency)93.9 percentage of sleep from time in bedStandard Deviation 5.8
Poor Sleep QualitySleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Efficiency)84.6 percentage of sleep from time in bedStandard Deviation 9.7
Overall DataSleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Efficiency)90.4 percentage of sleep from time in bedStandard Deviation 8.7
Primary

Sleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Latency)

Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) Sleep latency (minutes)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualitySleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Latency)10 minutesStandard Deviation 7.6
Poor Sleep QualitySleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Latency)26 minutesStandard Deviation 17.7
Overall DataSleep Quality Assessment 1 (Sleep Latency)16.0 minutesStandard Deviation 14.5
Primary

Sleep Quality Assessment 2

Sleep evaluation questionnaire Score: 0-56 (arbitrary unit) Lower score suggests better sleep

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualitySleep Quality Assessment 25.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
Poor Sleep QualitySleep Quality Assessment 29.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.69
Overall DataSleep Quality Assessment 26.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.37
Secondary

Anthropometric Measurements 1

Height (kg)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualityAnthropometric Measurements 1161.9 cmStandard Deviation 7.9
Poor Sleep QualityAnthropometric Measurements 1160.2 cmStandard Deviation 8.9
Overall DataAnthropometric Measurements 1161.3 cmStandard Deviation 8.3
Secondary

Anthropometric Measurements 2

Weight (kg)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualityAnthropometric Measurements 263.2 kgStandard Deviation 14
Poor Sleep QualityAnthropometric Measurements 260.7 kgStandard Deviation 11.6
Overall DataAnthropometric Measurements 262.3 kgStandard Deviation 13.1
Secondary

Anthropometric Measurements 3

Waist circumference (cm)

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualityAnthropometric Measurements 383.6 cmStandard Deviation 13.1
Poor Sleep QualityAnthropometric Measurements 381.5 cmStandard Deviation 10.3
Overall DataAnthropometric Measurements 382.8 cmStandard Deviation 12.1
Secondary

Blood Lipid and Glucose Profile

Plasma triglycerides, total cholesterol, ldl-cholesterol, hdl-cholesterol and glucose concentration

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualityBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileHDL-cholesterol1.58 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.48
Good Sleep QualityBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileTotal cholesterol5.4 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1
Good Sleep QualityBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileLDL-cholesterol3.22 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.88
Good Sleep QualityBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileTriglyceride1.23 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.57
Good Sleep QualityBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileGlucose5.50 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.89
Poor Sleep QualityBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileTriglyceride1.16 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.54
Poor Sleep QualityBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileLDL-cholesterol3.15 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.94
Poor Sleep QualityBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileHDL-cholesterol1.62 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.45
Poor Sleep QualityBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileGlucose5.37 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1.26
Poor Sleep QualityBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileTotal cholesterol5.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1
Overall DataBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileGlucose5.5 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1
Overall DataBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileLDL-cholesterol3.19 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.9
Overall DataBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileTriglyceride1.20 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.56
Overall DataBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileTotal cholesterol5.3 mmol/LStandard Deviation 1
Overall DataBlood Lipid and Glucose ProfileHDL-cholesterol1.60 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.47
Secondary

Blood Pressure

Blood pressure using electronic devices that work on the oscillometric technique. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure are both collected and reported

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualityBlood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure76 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.2
Good Sleep QualityBlood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure118.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 16.1
Poor Sleep QualityBlood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure73.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.3
Poor Sleep QualityBlood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure113.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 18.4
Overall DataBlood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure116.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 17.1
Overall DataBlood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure74.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.7
Secondary

Perceived Stress Assessment

Perceived stress assessment (PSS) questionnaire Score: 0-40 (arbitrary unit; au) A higher score indicates higher perceived stress

Time frame: Day 1

Population: Current data is the overall mean of the subjects that has participated. Comparison analysis is incomplete and still in progress.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualityPerceived Stress Assessment10.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Poor Sleep QualityPerceived Stress Assessment14.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Overall DataPerceived Stress Assessment12.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.8
Secondary

Plasma Carotenoids Concentration

High performance liquid chromatography quantitative analyses of carotenoids in plasma samples

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualityPlasma Carotenoids Concentration1.14 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.51
Poor Sleep QualityPlasma Carotenoids Concentration1.22 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.76
Overall DataPlasma Carotenoids Concentration1.17 mg/LStandard Deviation 0.61
Secondary

Skin Carotenoid Status

Measure with resonance Raman spectroscopy. A higher score is indicative of raised skin carotenoid levels and hence, a better outcome

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Good Sleep QualitySkin Carotenoid Status32746 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11195
Poor Sleep QualitySkin Carotenoid Status35307 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13139
Overall DataSkin Carotenoid Status33707 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11963

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026