Low Back Pain, Recurrent
Conditions
Brief summary
Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. A variety of exercise interventions which were designed as randomized control trails (RCTs) have been studied and shown effectiveness in improving pain and disability. These exercises typically focus on the abdominal and back musculature strength. However, many LBP patients did not show any improvement in their symptom after they carry out those exercise programs.
Detailed description
Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. A variety of exercise interventions which were designed as randomized control trails (RCTs) have been studied and shown effectiveness in improving pain and disability. These exercises typically focus on the abdominal and back musculature strength. However, many LBP patients did not show any improvement in their symptom after they carry out those exercise programs. Some authors consider that this type of low back pain may be caused by leg length inequality (LLI) in these patients, which resulted from poor gluteal neuromuscular control or muscles' imbalance. In consideration of few studies have been done for investigating the effects of gluteal muscles control training in LBP. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of additional gluteal muscles control training on improving functional LLI in patients with LBP. We hypothesized that gluteal muscle control training would be more effective in self-reported pain, and their functional disability would be improve after 6-week training program than control training group.
Interventions
1. core stability training: hold 5s/rep, 20 reps/times 1. supine, pelvic posterior tilt with TrA contraction. 2. supine, pelvic posterior tilt and maintain bil. knee on 90 degrees. 3. All four position with leg raise 2. Stretching ex. : hold 15 s/reps, 5 reps/times 1. Hamstring 2. Quadriceps 3. Additional gluteal muscle control training: hold 10 s/reps, 20 reps/times 1st to 2nd: 1. clam ex. without resistance 2. single leg bridge with maintain bil. ASIS even level 3rd to 4th: maintain 1st to 2nd ex. with resistance 5th: <!-- --> 1. maintain 3rd to 4th ex. 2. single leg standing on rock board to maintain balance 6th: <!-- --> 1. maintain 5th ex. 2. lunge ex. without hip internal rotation
1. core stability training: hold 5s/rep, 20 reps/times 1. supine, pelvic posterior tilt with TrA contraction. 2. supine, pelvic posterior tilt and maintain bil. knee on 90 degrees. 3. All four position with leg raise 2. Stretching ex. : hold 15 s/reps, 5 reps/times 1. Hamstring 2. Quadriceps
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* non-specific LBP (from inferior rib margin to the gluteal fold) * more than 3 months * Visual Analog Scale ≧5 (in past one month) * pelvic innominate rotation (anterior rotation in dominant side)
Exclusion criteria
* history of fracture or surgery * congenital anomalies in the spine, pelvis, or lower limbs * recent trauma, tumor, pregnancy or scoliosis * lower extremity paresthesia, unknown weakness * bowel and bladder dysfunction * predominant lower extremity pain with standing * presence of system illness, no reasoning weight loss, predominant night pain * specific sacroiliac joint dysfunction
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Leg Length Inequality | change from baseline at 6 weeks later | functional leg length inequality |
| Ilium Anterior Tilt Difference | change from baseline at 6 weeks later | bilateral ilium anterior tilt difference |
| Pelvic Inclination | change from baseline at 6 weeks later | bilateral pelvic inclination |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Disability | change from baseline at 6 weeks later | Oswestry disability index (ODI) Maximum: 100 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a worse outcome |
| Functional Ability | change from baseline at 6 weeks later | PSFS (0-10) Maximum: 10 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a better outcome |
| Pain Intensity | change from baseline at 6 weeks later | Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-10) Maximum: 10 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a worse outcome |
Countries
Taiwan
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| GC Group It mainly involve core stability exercise, stretching exercise and gluteal control training. All of above will be arranged 3 times a week for a total 6 weeks.
GC group: 1. core stability training: hold 5s/rep, 20 reps/times supine, pelvic posterior tilt with TrA contraction. supine, pelvic posterior tilt and maintain bil. knee on 90 degrees. All four position with leg raise 2. Stretching ex. : hold 15 s/reps, 5 reps/times
a. Hamstring b. Quadriceps 3. Additional gluteal muscle control training: hold 10 s/reps, 20 reps/times
1st to 2nd: clam ex. without resistance single leg bridge with maintain bil. ASIS even level 3rd to 4th: maintain 1st to 2nd ex. with resistance 5th:
a. maintain 3rd to 4th ex. b. single leg standing on rock board to maintain balance 6th: maintain 5th ex. lunge ex. without hip internal rotation | 24 |
| CG Group IIt involve core stability exercise and stretching exercise. All of above will be arranged 3 times a week for a total 6 weeks.
CG group: 1. core stability training: hold 5s/rep, 20 reps/times supine, pelvic posterior tilt with TrA contraction. supine, pelvic posterior tilt and maintain bil. knee on 90 degrees. All four position with leg raise 2. Stretching ex. : hold 15 s/reps, 5 reps/times
a. Hamstring b. Quadriceps | 24 |
| Total | 48 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | GC Group | CG Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 47.58 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.42 | 47.38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.31 | 47.48 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.47 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 13 Participants | 14 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 11 Participants | 10 Participants | 21 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 24 | 0 / 24 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 24 | 0 / 24 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 24 | 0 / 24 |
Outcome results
Ilium Anterior Tilt Difference
bilateral ilium anterior tilt difference
Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| GC Group | Ilium Anterior Tilt Difference | 0.67 degrees | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
| CG Group | Ilium Anterior Tilt Difference | 2.27 degrees | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
Leg Length Inequality
functional leg length inequality
Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| GC Group | Leg Length Inequality | 0.3 centemeter | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| CG Group | Leg Length Inequality | 0.58 centemeter | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
Pelvic Inclination
bilateral pelvic inclination
Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| GC Group | Pelvic Inclination | 1.03 degrees | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| CG Group | Pelvic Inclination | 1.56 degrees | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
Functional Ability
PSFS (0-10) Maximum: 10 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| GC Group | Functional Ability | 8.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
| CG Group | Functional Ability | 7.09 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.28 |
Functional Disability
Oswestry disability index (ODI) Maximum: 100 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| GC Group | Functional Disability | 7.51 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.34 |
| CG Group | Functional Disability | 11.91 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.65 |
Pain Intensity
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-10) Maximum: 10 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| GC Group | Pain Intensity | 1.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.21 |
| CG Group | Pain Intensity | 3.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.06 |