Skip to content

Additional Gluteal Control Training for Low Back Pain With Functional Leg Length Inequality

Additional Gluteal Control Training for Low Back Pain With Functional Leg Length Inequality: A Ramdomized Controlled Trail

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03554746
Enrollment
48
Registered
2018-06-13
Start date
2017-12-11
Completion date
2018-09-10
Last updated
2019-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain, Recurrent

Brief summary

Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. A variety of exercise interventions which were designed as randomized control trails (RCTs) have been studied and shown effectiveness in improving pain and disability. These exercises typically focus on the abdominal and back musculature strength. However, many LBP patients did not show any improvement in their symptom after they carry out those exercise programs.

Detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. A variety of exercise interventions which were designed as randomized control trails (RCTs) have been studied and shown effectiveness in improving pain and disability. These exercises typically focus on the abdominal and back musculature strength. However, many LBP patients did not show any improvement in their symptom after they carry out those exercise programs. Some authors consider that this type of low back pain may be caused by leg length inequality (LLI) in these patients, which resulted from poor gluteal neuromuscular control or muscles' imbalance. In consideration of few studies have been done for investigating the effects of gluteal muscles control training in LBP. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of additional gluteal muscles control training on improving functional LLI in patients with LBP. We hypothesized that gluteal muscle control training would be more effective in self-reported pain, and their functional disability would be improve after 6-week training program than control training group.

Interventions

OTHERGC group

1. core stability training: hold 5s/rep, 20 reps/times 1. supine, pelvic posterior tilt with TrA contraction. 2. supine, pelvic posterior tilt and maintain bil. knee on 90 degrees. 3. All four position with leg raise 2. Stretching ex. : hold 15 s/reps, 5 reps/times 1. Hamstring 2. Quadriceps 3. Additional gluteal muscle control training: hold 10 s/reps, 20 reps/times 1st to 2nd: 1. clam ex. without resistance 2. single leg bridge with maintain bil. ASIS even level 3rd to 4th: maintain 1st to 2nd ex. with resistance 5th: <!-- --> 1. maintain 3rd to 4th ex. 2. single leg standing on rock board to maintain balance 6th: <!-- --> 1. maintain 5th ex. 2. lunge ex. without hip internal rotation

1. core stability training: hold 5s/rep, 20 reps/times 1. supine, pelvic posterior tilt with TrA contraction. 2. supine, pelvic posterior tilt and maintain bil. knee on 90 degrees. 3. All four position with leg raise 2. Stretching ex. : hold 15 s/reps, 5 reps/times 1. Hamstring 2. Quadriceps

Sponsors

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* non-specific LBP (from inferior rib margin to the gluteal fold) * more than 3 months * Visual Analog Scale ≧5 (in past one month) * pelvic innominate rotation (anterior rotation in dominant side)

Exclusion criteria

* history of fracture or surgery * congenital anomalies in the spine, pelvis, or lower limbs * recent trauma, tumor, pregnancy or scoliosis * lower extremity paresthesia, unknown weakness * bowel and bladder dysfunction * predominant lower extremity pain with standing * presence of system illness, no reasoning weight loss, predominant night pain * specific sacroiliac joint dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Leg Length Inequalitychange from baseline at 6 weeks laterfunctional leg length inequality
Ilium Anterior Tilt Differencechange from baseline at 6 weeks laterbilateral ilium anterior tilt difference
Pelvic Inclinationchange from baseline at 6 weeks laterbilateral pelvic inclination

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Disabilitychange from baseline at 6 weeks laterOswestry disability index (ODI) Maximum: 100 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a worse outcome
Functional Abilitychange from baseline at 6 weeks laterPSFS (0-10) Maximum: 10 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a better outcome
Pain Intensitychange from baseline at 6 weeks laterVisual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-10) Maximum: 10 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a worse outcome

Countries

Taiwan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GC Group
It mainly involve core stability exercise, stretching exercise and gluteal control training. All of above will be arranged 3 times a week for a total 6 weeks. GC group: 1. core stability training: hold 5s/rep, 20 reps/times supine, pelvic posterior tilt with TrA contraction. supine, pelvic posterior tilt and maintain bil. knee on 90 degrees. All four position with leg raise 2. Stretching ex. : hold 15 s/reps, 5 reps/times a. Hamstring b. Quadriceps 3. Additional gluteal muscle control training: hold 10 s/reps, 20 reps/times 1st to 2nd: clam ex. without resistance single leg bridge with maintain bil. ASIS even level 3rd to 4th: maintain 1st to 2nd ex. with resistance 5th: a. maintain 3rd to 4th ex. b. single leg standing on rock board to maintain balance 6th: maintain 5th ex. lunge ex. without hip internal rotation
24
CG Group
IIt involve core stability exercise and stretching exercise. All of above will be arranged 3 times a week for a total 6 weeks. CG group: 1. core stability training: hold 5s/rep, 20 reps/times supine, pelvic posterior tilt with TrA contraction. supine, pelvic posterior tilt and maintain bil. knee on 90 degrees. All four position with leg raise 2. Stretching ex. : hold 15 s/reps, 5 reps/times a. Hamstring b. Quadriceps
24
Total48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGC GroupCG GroupTotal
Age, Continuous47.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.42
47.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.31
47.48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.47
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants14 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 240 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Ilium Anterior Tilt Difference

bilateral ilium anterior tilt difference

Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GC GroupIlium Anterior Tilt Difference0.67 degreesStandard Deviation 0.65
CG GroupIlium Anterior Tilt Difference2.27 degreesStandard Deviation 0.65
Primary

Leg Length Inequality

functional leg length inequality

Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GC GroupLeg Length Inequality0.3 centemeterStandard Deviation 0.21
CG GroupLeg Length Inequality0.58 centemeterStandard Deviation 0.13
Primary

Pelvic Inclination

bilateral pelvic inclination

Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GC GroupPelvic Inclination1.03 degreesStandard Deviation 0.37
CG GroupPelvic Inclination1.56 degreesStandard Deviation 0.51
Secondary

Functional Ability

PSFS (0-10) Maximum: 10 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a better outcome

Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GC GroupFunctional Ability8.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
CG GroupFunctional Ability7.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.28
Secondary

Functional Disability

Oswestry disability index (ODI) Maximum: 100 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a worse outcome

Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GC GroupFunctional Disability7.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.34
CG GroupFunctional Disability11.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.65
Secondary

Pain Intensity

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-10) Maximum: 10 Minimal: 0 higher scores mean a worse outcome

Time frame: change from baseline at 6 weeks later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GC GroupPain Intensity1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
CG GroupPain Intensity3.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026