Skip to content

Effects of VNS on RT-induced Inflammation and Prognosis of Patients With NSCLC

Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Radiotherapy-induced Inflammation and Prognosis of Patients With Lung Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03553485
Enrollment
12
Registered
2018-06-12
Start date
2018-08-08
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2019-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell

Brief summary

Lung cancer (LC) remains a leading cause of death among cancers worldwide. Though radiotherapy is one of the most frequently used treatments, it increases side-effects (pain, fatigue) and inflammation, possibly leading to further tumorigenesis of surviving cancer cells. The purpose of this study is to test the effects of transcutaneous auricular VNS vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS), known to reduce inflammation, on radiotherapy-induced inflammation and other side-effects in LC patients undergoing radiotherapy. In this feasibility study 12 patients with NSCLC stage III (A/B) receiving radiotherapy will be enrolled. Our primary endpoint is the effect of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on inflammatory levels (such as CRP and cytokines), immunological factors (neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes) and the tumor marker CEA. Our secondary endpoint is the psychological well-being and quality of life of the patients during their radiotherapy treatment.

Interventions

DEVICETranscutaneous vagus nerve stimulation

The transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulator Parasym consists of a stimulation unit and a dedicated ear electrode. The stimulation unit, having approximately the size of a common mobile phone, sends out the electrical impulses. It is connected with the ear electrode, which patients wear like an earphone. The patient can regulate and adapt the intensity of the stimulation (current intensity) according to his/her individual sensitivity, which can vary from day to day or even over the period of the therapy.

DEVICESham

Sham Earclip electrodes are electrodes that appear identical to functioning electrodes, however do not deliver any stimulation due to removed wiring.

RADIATIONRadiotherapy

Standard treatment for included patients

Sponsors

Kom Op Tegen Kanker
CollaboratorOTHER
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients \>18 years old * Patients with non-small cell lung cancer stage III (A or B) * Patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy * Patients with an HRV \< 70 msec

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with an active implantable medical device, such as a pacemaker, hearing aid implant or any other implanted electronic device * Patients with an implanted or wearable defibrillator. * Patients with myocardial disease * Patients with arrhythmias * Patients with an implanted metallic or electronic device in their head. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cancer prognosis: tumor marker7 weeksCEA (µg/mL)
Cancer prognosis: inflammatory level7 weeksCRP (mg/mL)
Cancer prognosis: immunological factors7 weeksneutrophil count (x10³/mm³)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health related Quality of Life7 weeksTo assess the psychological well-being and quality of life of the patients during their radiotherapy treatment the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire will be used.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactReijmen, Dra
eva.nina.reijmen@vub.be+32498254615

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026