Skip to content

The Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared to Valsartan on LV Remodelling in Asymptomatic LV Systolic Dysfunction After MI

The Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared to Valsartan on Left Ventricular Remodelling in Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomised, Double-blinded, Active-comparator, Cardiac-MR Based Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03552575
Acronym
RECOVER-LV
Enrollment
93
Registered
2018-06-12
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
2020-07-25
Last updated
2023-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

sacubritil, valsartan, left ventricular remodelling, asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, myocardial infarction

Brief summary

Prior to reperfusion therapy, the major therapeutic breakthrough in myocardial infarction was the demonstration that ACE inhibitors or ARBs, given to prevent adverse remodelling (progressive dilatation and decline in systolic function) in high risk patients, reduced the likelihood of developing heart failure and the risk of death. The neurohumoral systems which are activated in patients after myocardial infarction (and in heart failure) are not all harmful and some endogenous systems may be protective. The best recognised of these is the natriuretic peptide system. A- and B-type natriuretic peptides are secreted by the heart when it is stressed and these peptides promote vasodilation (reducing left ventricular wall stress), stimulate renal sodium and water excretion (i.e. antagonising the retention of salt and water characterising heart failure) and inhibit pathological growth i.e. hypertrophy and fibrosis (key components of the adverse left ventricular remodelling that occurs after infarction and in heart failure).The augmentation of plasma levels of endogenous natriuretic peptides can be achieved through inhibition of neutral endopeptidase, also known as neprilysin (NEP), which is responsible for the breakdown of natriuretic peptides. Recently, the addition of neprilysin inhibition to blockade of the RAAS (using sacubitril/valsartan), compared with RAAS blockade alone, reduced the risk of heart failure hospitalisation and death in patients with HF-REF. These exciting findings may lead to a new approach to the treatment of heart failure, with an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) replacing an ACE inhibitor as one of the fundamental treatments for this condition. We believe that the same approach may be beneficial in highrisk survivors of myocardial infarction. Recently, sacubitril/valsartan was shown to ameliorate adverse left ventricular remodelling in an experimental model of acute myocardial infarction. The objective of the present proposal is to gather proof-ofconcept, mechanistic, evidence in humans to support adoption of this new approach in patients at high risk after myocardial infarction as a result of residual left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Detailed description

The objective of the present proposal is to obtain information, which is currently not available, on the cardiac effects of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with LVSD, better characterise the neurohumoral actions of sacubitril/valsartan and gather proof-ofconcept, mechanistic, evidence in humans to support adoption of this new treatment in patients at high risk after myocardial infarction as a result of residual LVSD. Surprisingly, there is currently limited evidence about how sacubitril/valsartan works in humans. PARADIGM-HF was a large pragmatic mortality/morbidity trial with no mechanistic sub-studies and this is also true of a ongoing trial (PARADISE-MI) in acute myocardial infarction. Moreover, both trials either used or will use an ACE inhibitor (enalapril and ramipril, respectively), rather than an ARB as the active comparator for sacubitril/valsartan; use of valsartan in our study will allow us to precisely define the effects of neprilysin inhibition. A-type (or atrial) natriuretic peptide (ANP), C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) and adrenomedullin are substrates for neprilysin and may play a role in the action of sacubitril/valsartan but have not been measured in existing clinical trials (in part because of the instability of these peptides and unfeasibility of measuring them in multi-centre, multi-national trials). Indeed, ANP and CNP are more specific substrates for neprilysin than BNP. As has been mentioned above, cardiac fibrosis appears to be important in the process of LV remodelling in patients with asymptomatic LVSD and the development of HF-REF and is reflected in circulating biomarkers which may be influenced by sacubitril/valsartan

Interventions

DRUGsacubitril/valsartan

Sacubitril is a prodrug neprilysin inhibitor used in combination with valsartan to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA Class II-IV) and reduced ejection fraction.

DRUGValsartan

is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (commonly called an ARB, or angiotensin receptor blocker), that is selective for the type I (AT1) angiotensin receptor.

Sponsors

University of Glasgow
CollaboratorOTHER
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double blind

Intervention model description

Prospective, randomised, active-comparator, double-blinded study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at least 3 months prior to recruitment * Left ventricular ejection ≤40% as measured by transthoracic echocardiography * Ability to provide written, informed consent * Age ≥18 years * Tolerance of a minimum dose of ACE inhibitor/ARB (ramipril 2.5mg BD or equivalent) * Treatment with a beta-blocker unless not tolerated or contraindicated.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to CMR (ferrous prosthesis, implantable cardiac device or severe claustrophobia) * Clinical and/or radiological heart failure (NYHA≥2) * Symptomatic hypotension and/or systolic blood pressure \<100mmHg * eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73m2 and/or serum potassium \>5.2mmol/L * Persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation * History of AMI within last 3 months * History of hypersensitivity or allergy to ACE-inhibitors/ARB * History of angioedema * Known hypersensitivity to the active study drug substances, contrast media or any of the excipients * Obesity (where body girth exceeds MRI scanner diameter) * Pregnancy, planning pregnancy, or breast feeding * Inability to give informed consent or comply with study protocol * Evidence of hepatic disease as determined by any one of the following: AST or ALT values exceeding 2 x ULN at Visit 1, history of hepatic encephalopathy, history of oesophageal varices, or history of portacaval shunt * History of biliary cirrhosis and cholestasis * Active treatment with cholestyramine or colestipol resins * Active treatment with lithium or direct renin inhibitor * Participation in another intervention study involving a drug or device within the past 90 days (co-enrolment in observational studies is permitted)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Indexbaseline and 12 monthsChange in indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESVI) measured by cardiac MR measured in ml/m2

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in High Sensitivity Troponin I Levelsbaseline and 12 monthsmeasured in ng/L
Change in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Indexbaseline and 12 monthsChange in indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDVI) measured by cardiac MR measured in ml/m2
Change in Left Atrial Volume Indexbaseline and 12 monthsChange in indexed Left Atrial Volume (LAVI) measured by cardiac MR measured in ml/m2
Change in N-terminal Prohormone of B-type Natriuretic Peptide Levelsbaseline and 12 monthsmeasured in pg/ml
Change in Left Ventricular Mass Indexbaseline and 12 monthsChange in indexed left ventricular mass (LVMI) measured by cardiac MR measured in grams/m2
Change in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire12 monthsChange in patient well being as assessed by patient global assessment questionnaire which is a patient reported outcome measure that involves a patients own response to questions about their overall health and/or disease activity
Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fractionbaseline and 12 monthsChange in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by cardiac MR measured in percentage

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sacubitril/Valsartan
24mg/26mg (dose level 1), 49mg/51mg (dose level 2) and 97mg/103mg (dose level 3) twice daily sacubitril/valsartan: Sacubitril is a prodrug neprilysin inhibitor used in combination with valsartan to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA Class II-IV) and reduced ejection fraction.
47
Valsartan
40mg (dose level 1), 80mg (dose level 2) and 160mg (dose level 3) twice daily. Valsartan: is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (commonly called an ARB, or angiotensin receptor blocker), that is selective for the type I (AT1) angiotensin receptor.
46
Total93

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicValsartanTotalSacubitril/Valsartan
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
15 Participants36 Participants21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
31 Participants57 Participants26 Participants
Age, Continuous59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
60.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
44 Participants91 Participants47 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
46 participants93 participants47 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants85 Participants42 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 470 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 476 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 471 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index

Change in indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESVI) measured by cardiac MR measured in ml/m2

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

Population: There were 3 patients with incomplete data (1 death and 2 did not tolerate the MRI scan) accounting for the difference in overall number of participants randomised to those analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index-4.0 ml/m^2Standard Deviation 6.6
ValsartanChange in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index-2.0 ml/m^2Standard Deviation 7.3
p-value: 0.1995% CI: [-4.8, 1]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in High Sensitivity Troponin I Levels

measured in ng/L

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in High Sensitivity Troponin I Levels-1.1 ng/L
ValsartanChange in High Sensitivity Troponin I Levels-0.4 ng/L
p-value: 0.4195% CI: [0.62, 1.22]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Left Atrial Volume Index

Change in indexed Left Atrial Volume (LAVI) measured by cardiac MR measured in ml/m2

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Left Atrial Volume Index-2.8 ml/m^2Standard Deviation 9
ValsartanChange in Left Atrial Volume Index-0.8 ml/m^2Standard Deviation 11.7
p-value: 0.2995% CI: [-6.6, 2]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measured by cardiac MR measured in percentage

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction1.1 Ejection fraction %Standard Deviation 3.4
ValsartanChange in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction1.4 Ejection fraction %Standard Deviation 3.6
p-value: 0.4695% CI: [-2, 0.9]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Index

Change in indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDVI) measured by cardiac MR measured in ml/m2

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Index-4.4 ml/m^2Standard Deviation 8.8
ValsartanChange in Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Index-1.2 ml/m^2Standard Deviation 8.6
p-value: 0.195% CI: [-6.8, 0.6]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Left Ventricular Mass Index

Change in indexed left ventricular mass (LVMI) measured by cardiac MR measured in grams/m2

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Left Ventricular Mass Index-2.4 g/m^2Standard Deviation 4.9
ValsartanChange in Left Ventricular Mass Index-1.1 g/m^2Standard Deviation 5
p-value: 0.1695% CI: [-3.5, 0.6]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in N-terminal Prohormone of B-type Natriuretic Peptide Levels

measured in pg/ml

Time frame: baseline and 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in N-terminal Prohormone of B-type Natriuretic Peptide Levels-39 pg/mL
ValsartanChange in N-terminal Prohormone of B-type Natriuretic Peptide Levels-21 pg/mL
p-value: 0.3195% CI: [0.63, 1.16]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment Questionnaire

Change in patient well being as assessed by patient global assessment questionnaire which is a patient reported outcome measure that involves a patients own response to questions about their overall health and/or disease activity

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireSlightly improved5 Participants
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireSlightly worsened0 Participants
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireModerately improved9 Participants
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireModerately worsened0 Participants
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireUnchanged24 Participants
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireMarkedly worsened0 Participants
Sacubitril/ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireMarkedly improved8 Participants
ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireMarkedly worsened0 Participants
ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireMarkedly improved8 Participants
ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireModerately improved7 Participants
ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireSlightly improved10 Participants
ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireUnchanged21 Participants
ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireSlightly worsened0 Participants
ValsartanChange in Patient Well Being as Assessed by Patient Global Assessment QuestionnaireModerately worsened0 Participants
p-value: 0.56Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026