Skip to content

Evaluating the Effects of Propofol vs. Dexmedetomidine

Evaluation of the Effects on Efficiency of a Sedation Service by Switching From Propofol to Dexmedetomidine

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03552146
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-06-11
Start date
2018-07-24
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2019-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sedative Adverse Reaction

Keywords

sedation

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this observational study is to compare what drugs work best in sedating children (\> 3 months to \< 36 months) who need an MRI. This type of research may help clinicians (healthcare providers) learn more about how dexmedetomidine works compared to propofol. The investigators are planning to have 60 children complete the study at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite. Half (30) of the patients will be randomized to receive dexmedetomidine and the other half will receive propofol. (Both drugs are licensed and approved for the sedation performed for consented patients.)

Detailed description

There are several different medications commonly being used to facilitate the administration of radiologic procedures on children. Procedures such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRIs) require that the patient remain still for the duration of the test. Propofol has become the drug of choice for many sedation services due to its rapid onset of action, rapid recovery time, ability to achieve sedation reliably and favorable safety profile. Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha-2- adrenergic agonist, has also gained popularity with sedation services. Its main advantage over propofol is that it has minimal respiratory complications when compared to propofol. The sedative effect from dexmedetomidine preserves a natural sleep pattern and induces cooperative sedation in which patients are easily arousable. In pediatric studies, the most frequent adverse effect have been related to its potential to cause hypotension and bradycardia, which resolve with dose reduction. Additionally, dexmedetomidine does not seem to have as much impairment of cognitive function and has an opioid sparing effect. Dexmedetomidine, however, has a longer onset of action and longer recovery time compared to propofol, which has limited its use with many sedation services.

Interventions

DRUGPropofol

Patients will be randomized to either propofol or dexmedetomidine and then observed for sedation-related events from time of drug administration to discharge.

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Patients will be randomized to either propofol or dexmedetomidine and then observed for sedation-related events from time of drug administration to discharge.

Sponsors

Morehouse School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Months to 36 Months
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient (or Parent/Guardian) is English speaking 2. Patient is undergoing a scheduled, elective non-contrast MRI of the brain 3. Patient is \> 3 months to \<36 months of age

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients undergoing MRI with contrast 2. Patients older than 36 months of age or younger than 3 months of age 3. Patients presenting to Emergency Department (ED) out of screening hours 4. Patients who are not English speaking 5. Patients who have history or record of propofol or dexmedetomidine allergy 6. Patients with known or history of anaphylaxis to eggs, egg products, soybeans, or soy based products; if patient has a history of a hypersensitivity reaction associated with exposure to eggs, egg products, soybeans, or soy based products, approval must be given by the treating attending physician and documented on the patient's medical record. 7. Patients with unstable cardiac or respiratory status as determined by treating attending physician 8. Patients who are receiving digoxin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural times to achieve optimal sedationStart of procedure to discharge (up to 8 hours)Measuring the amount of time it takes for a patient to be discharged starting from induction (start of infusion).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sedation related eventsStart of procedure to up to 36 hours post-dischargeAdverse events related to the sedation (i.e., apnea, desaturation, change in heart rate)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-discharge clinical statusBaseline to 24 hours post dischargeRecording any events post-discharge that are possibly sedation-related

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactDavid Fagin, MD
david.fagin@pema.com404-785-6000
Backup ContactLilly H Immergluck, MD
lilly.immergluck@pema.com404-785-6000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026