Skip to content

The DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs PTA in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) Below-the-Knee (BTK) Vascular Stent System (DES BTK Vascular Stent System) vs Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Treating Infrapopliteal Lesions in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03551496
Acronym
SAVAL
Enrollment
201
Registered
2018-06-11
Start date
2018-08-31
Completion date
2023-12-20
Last updated
2024-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Limb Ischemia

Brief summary

Single phased global, prospective, multicenter clinical trial designed to demonstrate a superior patency rate and acceptable safety in below the knee arteries with lesions treated with the DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).

Detailed description

A global, prospective, multicenter, 2:1 randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the DES BTK Vascular Stent System compared to standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat infrapopliteal artery lesions in subjects with critical limb ischemia(CLI). Approximately 201 subjects will be randomized/enrolled to support a 2:1 randomization.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTDrug Eluting Stent - Below the Knee

Treatment arm with DES-BTK, starting with one size of the device - 3.5 mm X 80 mm

DEVICEStandard PTA Control Arm

The PTA device used must be market-released in the investigational center's geography and the size (ie, diameter, balloon length and catheter length) will be determined by the investigator.

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

A review of the wound assessment data will be completed by independent reviewer(s) who will be blinded to the randomized therapy.

Intervention model description

Approximately 201 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion for phase A RCT. Randomizations will be stratified by investigational center and lesion length with 2 subjects receiving the DES BTK for every 1 subject receiving treatment with standard PTA.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is 18 years or older and has signed and dated the trial informed consent form (ICF) 2. Subject is willing and able to comply with the trial testing, procedures and follow-up schedule 3. Subject has chronic, symptomatic lower limb ischemia, determined by Rutherford categories 4 or 5 in the target limb, with wound(s) confined to toes/forefoot 4. Subject is a male or non-pregnant female. If female of child-bearing potential, and if sexually active must be using, or agree to use, a medically-acceptable method of birth control as confirmed by the investigator Intra-procedure Inclusion Criteria: 1. Stenotic, restenotic or occlusive target lesion(s) located in the tibioperoneal trunk, anterior tibial, posterior tibial and/or peroneal artery(ies). 2. Target lesion(s) must be at least 4cm above the ankle joint 3. A single target lesion per vessel, in up to 2 vessels, in a single limb 4. Degree of stenosis ≥ 70% by visual angiographic assessment 5. Reference vessel diameter is between 2.5 - 3.25mm for phase A RCT 6. Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 70 mm for phase A RCT prior to the data monitoring committee's approval for stent overlap. (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with one DES BTK stent, if randomized to stent) 7. Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 140 mm for phase A RCT after the data monitoring committee's approval for stent overlap (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with up to two DES BTK stents, if randomized to stent) 8. Target vessel(s) reconstitute(s) at or above the stenting limit zone (4cm above the ankle joint) 9. Target lesion(s) is located in an area that may be stented without blocking access to patent main branches 10. Treatment of all above the knee inflow lesion(s) is successful prior to treatment of the target lesion 11. Guidewire has successfully crossed the target lesion(s)

Exclusion criteria

1. Life expectancy ≤ 1year 2. Stroke ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date 3. Prior or planned major amputation in the target limb 4. Previous surgery in the target vessel(s) (including prior ipsilateral crural bypass) 5. Previously implanted stent in the target vessel(s) 6. Failed PTA of target lesion/vessel ≤ 60 days prior to the procedure date 7. Renal failure as measured by a GFR ≤ 30ml/min per 1.73m2, measured ≤ 30 days prior to the procedure date 8. Subject has a platelet count ≤ 50 or ≥ 600 X 103/µL ≤ 30 days prior to the procedure date 9. NYHA class IV heart failure 10. Subject has symptomatic coronary artery disease (ie, unstable angina) 11. History of myocardial infarction or thrombolysis ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date 12. Non-atherosclerotic disease resulting in occlusion (eg, embolism, Buerger's disease, vasculitis) 13. Subject is currently taking Canagliflozin 14. Body Mass Index (BMI) \<18 15. Active septicemia or bacteremia 16. Coagulation disorder, including hypercoagulability 17. Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy 18. Known allergies to stent or stent components 19. Known allergy to contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-medicated prior to the interventional procedure 20. Known hypersensitivity to heparin 21. Subject is on a high dose of steroids or is on immunosuppressive therapy 22. Subject is currently participating, or plans to participate in, another investigational trial that may confound the results of this trial (unless written approval is received from the Boston Scientific study team) Intra-procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Primary Patency12 monthsTwelve-Month Primary Patency defined as a binary endpoint to be determined via duplex ultrasound (DUS) measuring flow at the 12-month follow-up visit, in the absence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass of the target lesion. Data table consists of the number of participants with flow as assessed by DUS.
Number of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE)12 monthsThe primary safety endpoint assesses freedom from major adverse events (MAE) at 12 months post-procedure. (MAE is defined as: above ankle amputation in index limb; major re-intervention; and perioperative (30 day) mortality)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Major Amputation (Defined as Amputation of the Lower Limb at the Ankle Level or Above)12 months post procedureRates of amputation of the lower limb at the ankle level or above
Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.12 months post procedureThe EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality-of-life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 5 responses. The responses record 5 levels of severity (no problems/slight problems/moderate problems/severe problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension). The levels are assigned a numeric code 1-5 (eg, 1= no problems and 5= extreme problems).
Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.12 months post procedureChanges in quality of life is measured using the Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) questionnaire, which is a 25 item questionnaire used to measure the quality-of-life in patients with lower limb ischemia. The tool is sub-divided into 5 domains: pain, symptoms, activities, social and emotional.
Number of Participants With Baseline Wounds Assessed as Healed12 months post procedureWounds assessed for healed status by Independent Wound Assessors, blinded to randomized treatment.
Number of Participants With Assisted Primary Patency12 months post procedureAssisted primary patency defined as the percentage (%) of lesions without clinically-driven TLR and those with clinically-driven TLR (not due to complete occlusion or by-pass) which show flow by DUS without restenosis.
Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events12 months post procedureAdverse events (AEs) to be classified as major (defined as above ankle amputation of the index limb, major re-intervention (new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft, or thrombectomy/thrombolysis) and perioperative (30 day) mortality), serious, non-serious, unanticipated, procedure-related and device-related.
Number of Participants Who Were Admitted to the Hospital Within 30 Days After the Index Procedure.Up to 30 days post procedureHospitalizations related to Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) due to target lesion revascularization (TLR)/target vessel revascularization (TVR) or Target Limb Major Amputation or Procedure/Device related Adverse Events
Number of Participants With Hemodynamic Improvement12 months post procedureHemodynamic improvement is defined as improvement of ankle-brachial index (ABI) by ≥0.10 or to an ABI ≥0.90 as compared to pre-procedure value without the need for repeat revascularization.
Number of Participants With Rate of Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification From Baseline12 months post procedureEndpoint determined to be a success when there is an improvement in Rutherford Classification of one or more categories as compared to pre-procedure without the need for repeat TLR. Rutherford Classifications: i. Category 0 - Asymptomatic ii. Category 1 - Mild claudication iii. Category 2 - Moderate claudication iv. Category 3 - Severe claudication v. Category 4 - Ischemic rest pain vi. Category 5 - Minor tissue loss - nonhealing ulcer, focal gangrene vii. Category 6 - Major tissue loss - extending above transmetatarsal (TM) level
Number of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization12 months post procedureClinically-driven target lesion revascularization is defined as any surgical or percutaneous intervention to the target lesion after the index procedure if: 1. Occurring within 5mm proximal or distal to the original treatment segment with diameter stenosis ≥50% by quantitative angiography and if participant has recurrent symptoms OR 2. In-lesion diameter stenosis less than 50% might also be considered a MAE by the CEC if the subject has recurrent symptoms. Recurrent symptoms are defined as having ≥ 1 change in Rutherford Classification or associated with decreased ABI/TBI of ≥20% or ≥ 0.15 in the treated segment.

Countries

Belgium, France, Japan, Netherlands, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of 201 enrolled participants, 201 met inclusion criteria and were randomized. Phase 2 was not conducted.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DES BTK
Treatment with DES BTK Drug Eluting Stent - Below the Knee: Treatment arm with DES-BTK, starting with one size of the device - 3.5 mm X 80 mm
130
Conventional PTA
Treatment with standard PTA Standard PTA Control Arm: The PTA device used must be market-released in the investigational center's geography and the size (ie, diameter, balloon length and catheter length) will be determined by the investigator.
71
Total201

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath117
Overall StudyOther Reasons10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalConventional PTADES BTK
Age, Customized
Age (Year)
73.02 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.78
72.58 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.14
73.27 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.61
Cardiac History
History of Congestive Heart Failure
45 Participants15 Participants30 Participants
Cardiac History
History of Coronary Artery Disease
115 Participants40 Participants75 Participants
Cardiac History
History of Myocardial Infarction (MI)
42 Participants13 Participants29 Participants
Current Anginal Status
None
170 Participants62 Participants108 Participants
Current Anginal Status
Stable Angina
31 Participants9 Participants22 Participants
Current Anginal Status
Unknown
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Current Anginal Status
Unstable Angina
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Current Diabetes Mellitus134 Participants47 Participants87 Participants
History of amputation44 Participants16 Participants28 Participants
History of amputation - Limb treated
Both
5 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
History of amputation - Limb treated
Non-Target Limb
25 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
History of amputation - Limb treated
Target Limb
14 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
History of amputation - Type of amputation
Major
10 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
History of amputation - Type of amputation
Minor
36 Participants13 Participants23 Participants
History of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease29 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
History of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery45 Participants14 Participants31 Participants
History of Hyperlipidemia requiring medication153 Participants52 Participants101 Participants
History of Hypertension requiring medication174 Participants59 Participants115 Participants
History of interventions with paclitaxel-containing devices88 Participants29 Participants59 Participants
History of other peripheral endovascular interventions with non-paclitaxel containing devices119 Participants37 Participants82 Participants
History of other peripheral endovascular interventions with non-paclitaxel devices - Limb treated
Both
26 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
History of other peripheral endovascular interventions with non-paclitaxel devices - Limb treated
Non-Target Limb
45 Participants18 Participants27 Participants
History of other peripheral endovascular interventions with non-paclitaxel devices - Limb treated
Target Limb
48 Participants11 Participants37 Participants
History of other peripheral endovascular with non-paclitaxel device-Type of most recent intervention
Atherectomy
52 Participants15 Participants37 Participants
History of other peripheral endovascular with non-paclitaxel device-Type of most recent intervention
Other
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
History of other peripheral endovascular with non-paclitaxel device-Type of most recent intervention
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA)
93 Participants27 Participants66 Participants
History of other peripheral endovascular with non-paclitaxel device-Type of most recent intervention
Stenting
50 Participants15 Participants35 Participants
History of other peripheral vascular surgery25 Participants11 Participants14 Participants
History of other peripheral vascular surgery - Limb Treated
Both
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
History of other peripheral vascular surgery - Limb Treated
Non-Target Limb
16 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
History of other peripheral vascular surgery - Limb Treated
Target Limb
8 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
History of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)66 Participants22 Participants44 Participants
Neurologic/Renal History
History of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)
28 Participants11 Participants17 Participants
Neurologic/Renal History
History of Renal Insufficiency
34 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Neurologic/Renal History
History of Renal Percutaneous Intervention
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Neurologic/Renal History
History of Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIA)
11 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Asian
51 Participants18 Participants33 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Black, of African heritage
25 Participants10 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Caucasian
104 Participants35 Participants69 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Not Disclosed
5 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity
Other
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
26 Participants9 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
50 Participants17 Participants33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
125 Participants45 Participants80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants16 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
150 Participants55 Participants95 Participants
Smoking
Current
45 Participants18 Participants27 Participants
Smoking
Never
54 Participants18 Participants36 Participants
Smoking
Previous
101 Participants35 Participants66 Participants
Smoking
Unknown
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
11 / 1307 / 71
other
Total, other adverse events
84 / 13037 / 71
serious
Total, serious adverse events
82 / 13051 / 71

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE)

The primary safety endpoint assesses freedom from major adverse events (MAE) at 12 months post-procedure. (MAE is defined as: above ankle amputation in index limb; major re-intervention; and perioperative (30 day) mortality)

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKNumber of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE)109 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE)61 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Primary Patency

Twelve-Month Primary Patency defined as a binary endpoint to be determined via duplex ultrasound (DUS) measuring flow at the 12-month follow-up visit, in the absence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass of the target lesion. Data table consists of the number of participants with flow as assessed by DUS.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Primary Patency70 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Primary Patency38 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Who Were Admitted to the Hospital Within 30 Days After the Index Procedure.

Hospitalizations related to Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) due to target lesion revascularization (TLR)/target vessel revascularization (TVR) or Target Limb Major Amputation or Procedure/Device related Adverse Events

Time frame: Up to 30 days post procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKNumber of Participants Who Were Admitted to the Hospital Within 30 Days After the Index Procedure.2 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants Who Were Admitted to the Hospital Within 30 Days After the Index Procedure.3 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Assisted Primary Patency

Assisted primary patency defined as the percentage (%) of lesions without clinically-driven TLR and those with clinically-driven TLR (not due to complete occlusion or by-pass) which show flow by DUS without restenosis.

Time frame: 12 months post procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Assisted Primary Patency75 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Assisted Primary Patency41 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Baseline Wounds Assessed as Healed

Wounds assessed for healed status by Independent Wound Assessors, blinded to randomized treatment.

Time frame: 12 months post procedure

Population: Data for baseline wounds assessed as healed are based on subjects with the data point collected.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Baseline Wounds Assessed as Healed34 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Baseline Wounds Assessed as Healed15 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization

Clinically-driven target lesion revascularization is defined as any surgical or percutaneous intervention to the target lesion after the index procedure if: 1. Occurring within 5mm proximal or distal to the original treatment segment with diameter stenosis ≥50% by quantitative angiography and if participant has recurrent symptoms OR 2. In-lesion diameter stenosis less than 50% might also be considered a MAE by the CEC if the subject has recurrent symptoms. Recurrent symptoms are defined as having ≥ 1 change in Rutherford Classification or associated with decreased ABI/TBI of ≥20% or ≥ 0.15 in the treated segment.

Time frame: 12 months post procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization21 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization10 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Hemodynamic Improvement

Hemodynamic improvement is defined as improvement of ankle-brachial index (ABI) by ≥0.10 or to an ABI ≥0.90 as compared to pre-procedure value without the need for repeat revascularization.

Time frame: 12 months post procedure

Population: Data for Hemodynamic Improvement are based on subjects with the data point collected.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Hemodynamic Improvement59 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Hemodynamic Improvement28 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Major Amputation (Defined as Amputation of the Lower Limb at the Ankle Level or Above)

Rates of amputation of the lower limb at the ankle level or above

Time frame: 12 months post procedure

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Major Amputation (Defined as Amputation of the Lower Limb at the Ankle Level or Above)3 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Major Amputation (Defined as Amputation of the Lower Limb at the Ankle Level or Above)1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events

Adverse events (AEs) to be classified as major (defined as above ankle amputation of the index limb, major re-intervention (new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft, or thrombectomy/thrombolysis) and perioperative (30 day) mortality), serious, non-serious, unanticipated, procedure-related and device-related.

Time frame: 12 months post procedure

Population: The data presented in this table for the serious, non-serious, unanticipated, device-related, and procedure-related events are based on crude event rates, and the data used for the major events is based on the subjects evaluable for the primary safety endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsSerious82 Participants
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsNon serious84 Participants
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsMajor10 Participants
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsUnanticipated0 Participants
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsDevice-Related16 Participants
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsProcedure-Related21 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsDevice-Related6 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsSerious51 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsUnanticipated0 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsNon serious37 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsProcedure-Related16 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse EventsMajor3 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Rate of Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification From Baseline

Endpoint determined to be a success when there is an improvement in Rutherford Classification of one or more categories as compared to pre-procedure without the need for repeat TLR. Rutherford Classifications: i. Category 0 - Asymptomatic ii. Category 1 - Mild claudication iii. Category 2 - Moderate claudication iv. Category 3 - Severe claudication v. Category 4 - Ischemic rest pain vi. Category 5 - Minor tissue loss - nonhealing ulcer, focal gangrene vii. Category 6 - Major tissue loss - extending above transmetatarsal (TM) level

Time frame: 12 months post procedure

Population: Data for Rate of Primary Sustained clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification from baseline are based on subjects with the data point collected

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKNumber of Participants With Rate of Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification From Baseline80 Participants
Conventional PTANumber of Participants With Rate of Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification From Baseline36 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.

The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality-of-life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 5 responses. The responses record 5 levels of severity (no problems/slight problems/moderate problems/severe problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension). The levels are assigned a numeric code 1-5 (eg, 1= no problems and 5= extreme problems).

Time frame: 12 months post procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.Self-Care Improvement19 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.Pain/Discomfort Improvement48 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.Usual Activities Improvement32 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.Anxiety/Depression Improvement28 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.Mobility Improvement40 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.Anxiety/Depression Improvement12 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.Mobility Improvement16 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.Self-Care Improvement8 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.Usual Activities Improvement17 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.Pain/Discomfort Improvement18 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.

Changes in quality of life is measured using the Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) questionnaire, which is a 25 item questionnaire used to measure the quality-of-life in patients with lower limb ischemia. The tool is sub-divided into 5 domains: pain, symptoms, activities, social and emotional.

Time frame: 12 months post procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in restricted in spending time with friends or relatives44 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to climb stairs47 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in cold feet have given50 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to participate in social activities49 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in pain in the foot (or leg) after going to bed at night58 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to do routine household work54 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in pain in the foot (or leg) when resting67 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ulcers or sores on my leg (or foot) caused pain or distress45 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in pins and needles or numbness in leg (or foot) have caused53 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in the range of activities that would have liked to do58 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to exercise or to play sports56 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in problems caused by poor circulation made feel frustrated60 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in the distance I can walk has improved39 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in pain in the leg (or foot) given63 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in worried that I might injure my leg42 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in felt guilty about relying on friends or relatives47 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to walk59 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to go shopping or carry bags50 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in legs felt tired or weak55 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in worried in danger of losing a part of leg or foot58 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in being (or becoming) housebound has concerned42 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in distance I can walk became less48 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in pain in leg (or foot) when walking61 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in depressed about the poor circulation in legs57 Participants
DES BTKParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in concerned about having poor circulation in legs68 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in depressed about the poor circulation in legs28 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in pain in leg (or foot) when walking27 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in worried that I might injure my leg21 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in cold feet have given26 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to exercise or to play sports21 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in legs felt tired or weak26 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in restricted in spending time with friends or relatives18 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in pain in the foot (or leg) after going to bed at night31 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in pins and needles or numbness in leg (or foot) have caused26 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in the distance I can walk has improved17 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to walk25 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in being (or becoming) housebound has concerned28 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in pain in the foot (or leg) when resting31 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to climb stairs20 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to participate in social activities23 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to do routine household work22 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ulcers or sores on my leg (or foot) caused pain or distress15 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in the range of activities that would have liked to do26 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in problems caused by poor circulation made feel frustrated29 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in pain in the leg (or foot) given30 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in felt guilty about relying on friends or relatives28 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in ability to go shopping or carry bags21 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in worried in danger of losing a part of leg or foot28 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in distance I can walk became less25 Participants
Conventional PTAParticipant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.Improvement in concerned about having poor circulation in legs26 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026