Critical Limb Ischemia
Conditions
Brief summary
Single phased global, prospective, multicenter clinical trial designed to demonstrate a superior patency rate and acceptable safety in below the knee arteries with lesions treated with the DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).
Detailed description
A global, prospective, multicenter, 2:1 randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the DES BTK Vascular Stent System compared to standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat infrapopliteal artery lesions in subjects with critical limb ischemia(CLI). Approximately 201 subjects will be randomized/enrolled to support a 2:1 randomization.
Interventions
Treatment arm with DES-BTK, starting with one size of the device - 3.5 mm X 80 mm
The PTA device used must be market-released in the investigational center's geography and the size (ie, diameter, balloon length and catheter length) will be determined by the investigator.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
A review of the wound assessment data will be completed by independent reviewer(s) who will be blinded to the randomized therapy.
Intervention model description
Approximately 201 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion for phase A RCT. Randomizations will be stratified by investigational center and lesion length with 2 subjects receiving the DES BTK for every 1 subject receiving treatment with standard PTA.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Subject is 18 years or older and has signed and dated the trial informed consent form (ICF) 2. Subject is willing and able to comply with the trial testing, procedures and follow-up schedule 3. Subject has chronic, symptomatic lower limb ischemia, determined by Rutherford categories 4 or 5 in the target limb, with wound(s) confined to toes/forefoot 4. Subject is a male or non-pregnant female. If female of child-bearing potential, and if sexually active must be using, or agree to use, a medically-acceptable method of birth control as confirmed by the investigator Intra-procedure Inclusion Criteria: 1. Stenotic, restenotic or occlusive target lesion(s) located in the tibioperoneal trunk, anterior tibial, posterior tibial and/or peroneal artery(ies). 2. Target lesion(s) must be at least 4cm above the ankle joint 3. A single target lesion per vessel, in up to 2 vessels, in a single limb 4. Degree of stenosis ≥ 70% by visual angiographic assessment 5. Reference vessel diameter is between 2.5 - 3.25mm for phase A RCT 6. Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 70 mm for phase A RCT prior to the data monitoring committee's approval for stent overlap. (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with one DES BTK stent, if randomized to stent) 7. Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 140 mm for phase A RCT after the data monitoring committee's approval for stent overlap (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with up to two DES BTK stents, if randomized to stent) 8. Target vessel(s) reconstitute(s) at or above the stenting limit zone (4cm above the ankle joint) 9. Target lesion(s) is located in an area that may be stented without blocking access to patent main branches 10. Treatment of all above the knee inflow lesion(s) is successful prior to treatment of the target lesion 11. Guidewire has successfully crossed the target lesion(s)
Exclusion criteria
1. Life expectancy ≤ 1year 2. Stroke ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date 3. Prior or planned major amputation in the target limb 4. Previous surgery in the target vessel(s) (including prior ipsilateral crural bypass) 5. Previously implanted stent in the target vessel(s) 6. Failed PTA of target lesion/vessel ≤ 60 days prior to the procedure date 7. Renal failure as measured by a GFR ≤ 30ml/min per 1.73m2, measured ≤ 30 days prior to the procedure date 8. Subject has a platelet count ≤ 50 or ≥ 600 X 103/µL ≤ 30 days prior to the procedure date 9. NYHA class IV heart failure 10. Subject has symptomatic coronary artery disease (ie, unstable angina) 11. History of myocardial infarction or thrombolysis ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date 12. Non-atherosclerotic disease resulting in occlusion (eg, embolism, Buerger's disease, vasculitis) 13. Subject is currently taking Canagliflozin 14. Body Mass Index (BMI) \<18 15. Active septicemia or bacteremia 16. Coagulation disorder, including hypercoagulability 17. Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy 18. Known allergies to stent or stent components 19. Known allergy to contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-medicated prior to the interventional procedure 20. Known hypersensitivity to heparin 21. Subject is on a high dose of steroids or is on immunosuppressive therapy 22. Subject is currently participating, or plans to participate in, another investigational trial that may confound the results of this trial (unless written approval is received from the Boston Scientific study team) Intra-procedure
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Primary Patency | 12 months | Twelve-Month Primary Patency defined as a binary endpoint to be determined via duplex ultrasound (DUS) measuring flow at the 12-month follow-up visit, in the absence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass of the target lesion. Data table consists of the number of participants with flow as assessed by DUS. |
| Number of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE) | 12 months | The primary safety endpoint assesses freedom from major adverse events (MAE) at 12 months post-procedure. (MAE is defined as: above ankle amputation in index limb; major re-intervention; and perioperative (30 day) mortality) |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Major Amputation (Defined as Amputation of the Lower Limb at the Ankle Level or Above) | 12 months post procedure | Rates of amputation of the lower limb at the ankle level or above |
| Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | 12 months post procedure | The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality-of-life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 5 responses. The responses record 5 levels of severity (no problems/slight problems/moderate problems/severe problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension). The levels are assigned a numeric code 1-5 (eg, 1= no problems and 5= extreme problems). |
| Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | 12 months post procedure | Changes in quality of life is measured using the Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) questionnaire, which is a 25 item questionnaire used to measure the quality-of-life in patients with lower limb ischemia. The tool is sub-divided into 5 domains: pain, symptoms, activities, social and emotional. |
| Number of Participants With Baseline Wounds Assessed as Healed | 12 months post procedure | Wounds assessed for healed status by Independent Wound Assessors, blinded to randomized treatment. |
| Number of Participants With Assisted Primary Patency | 12 months post procedure | Assisted primary patency defined as the percentage (%) of lesions without clinically-driven TLR and those with clinically-driven TLR (not due to complete occlusion or by-pass) which show flow by DUS without restenosis. |
| Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | 12 months post procedure | Adverse events (AEs) to be classified as major (defined as above ankle amputation of the index limb, major re-intervention (new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft, or thrombectomy/thrombolysis) and perioperative (30 day) mortality), serious, non-serious, unanticipated, procedure-related and device-related. |
| Number of Participants Who Were Admitted to the Hospital Within 30 Days After the Index Procedure. | Up to 30 days post procedure | Hospitalizations related to Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) due to target lesion revascularization (TLR)/target vessel revascularization (TVR) or Target Limb Major Amputation or Procedure/Device related Adverse Events |
| Number of Participants With Hemodynamic Improvement | 12 months post procedure | Hemodynamic improvement is defined as improvement of ankle-brachial index (ABI) by ≥0.10 or to an ABI ≥0.90 as compared to pre-procedure value without the need for repeat revascularization. |
| Number of Participants With Rate of Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification From Baseline | 12 months post procedure | Endpoint determined to be a success when there is an improvement in Rutherford Classification of one or more categories as compared to pre-procedure without the need for repeat TLR. Rutherford Classifications: i. Category 0 - Asymptomatic ii. Category 1 - Mild claudication iii. Category 2 - Moderate claudication iv. Category 3 - Severe claudication v. Category 4 - Ischemic rest pain vi. Category 5 - Minor tissue loss - nonhealing ulcer, focal gangrene vii. Category 6 - Major tissue loss - extending above transmetatarsal (TM) level |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization | 12 months post procedure | Clinically-driven target lesion revascularization is defined as any surgical or percutaneous intervention to the target lesion after the index procedure if: 1. Occurring within 5mm proximal or distal to the original treatment segment with diameter stenosis ≥50% by quantitative angiography and if participant has recurrent symptoms OR 2. In-lesion diameter stenosis less than 50% might also be considered a MAE by the CEC if the subject has recurrent symptoms. Recurrent symptoms are defined as having ≥ 1 change in Rutherford Classification or associated with decreased ABI/TBI of ≥20% or ≥ 0.15 in the treated segment. |
Countries
Belgium, France, Japan, Netherlands, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Of 201 enrolled participants, 201 met inclusion criteria and were randomized. Phase 2 was not conducted.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| DES BTK Treatment with DES BTK
Drug Eluting Stent - Below the Knee: Treatment arm with DES-BTK, starting with one size of the device - 3.5 mm X 80 mm | 130 |
| Conventional PTA Treatment with standard PTA
Standard PTA Control Arm: The PTA device used must be market-released in the investigational center's geography and the size (ie, diameter, balloon length and catheter length) will be determined by the investigator. | 71 |
| Total | 201 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 11 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Other Reasons | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Conventional PTA | DES BTK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized Age (Year) | 73.02 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.78 | 72.58 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.14 | 73.27 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.61 |
| Cardiac History History of Congestive Heart Failure | 45 Participants | 15 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Cardiac History History of Coronary Artery Disease | 115 Participants | 40 Participants | 75 Participants |
| Cardiac History History of Myocardial Infarction (MI) | 42 Participants | 13 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Current Anginal Status None | 170 Participants | 62 Participants | 108 Participants |
| Current Anginal Status Stable Angina | 31 Participants | 9 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Current Anginal Status Unknown | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Current Anginal Status Unstable Angina | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Current Diabetes Mellitus | 134 Participants | 47 Participants | 87 Participants |
| History of amputation | 44 Participants | 16 Participants | 28 Participants |
| History of amputation - Limb treated Both | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants |
| History of amputation - Limb treated Non-Target Limb | 25 Participants | 9 Participants | 16 Participants |
| History of amputation - Limb treated Target Limb | 14 Participants | 4 Participants | 10 Participants |
| History of amputation - Type of amputation Major | 10 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| History of amputation - Type of amputation Minor | 36 Participants | 13 Participants | 23 Participants |
| History of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | 29 Participants | 9 Participants | 20 Participants |
| History of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery | 45 Participants | 14 Participants | 31 Participants |
| History of Hyperlipidemia requiring medication | 153 Participants | 52 Participants | 101 Participants |
| History of Hypertension requiring medication | 174 Participants | 59 Participants | 115 Participants |
| History of interventions with paclitaxel-containing devices | 88 Participants | 29 Participants | 59 Participants |
| History of other peripheral endovascular interventions with non-paclitaxel containing devices | 119 Participants | 37 Participants | 82 Participants |
| History of other peripheral endovascular interventions with non-paclitaxel devices - Limb treated Both | 26 Participants | 8 Participants | 18 Participants |
| History of other peripheral endovascular interventions with non-paclitaxel devices - Limb treated Non-Target Limb | 45 Participants | 18 Participants | 27 Participants |
| History of other peripheral endovascular interventions with non-paclitaxel devices - Limb treated Target Limb | 48 Participants | 11 Participants | 37 Participants |
| History of other peripheral endovascular with non-paclitaxel device-Type of most recent intervention Atherectomy | 52 Participants | 15 Participants | 37 Participants |
| History of other peripheral endovascular with non-paclitaxel device-Type of most recent intervention Other | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| History of other peripheral endovascular with non-paclitaxel device-Type of most recent intervention Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) | 93 Participants | 27 Participants | 66 Participants |
| History of other peripheral endovascular with non-paclitaxel device-Type of most recent intervention Stenting | 50 Participants | 15 Participants | 35 Participants |
| History of other peripheral vascular surgery | 25 Participants | 11 Participants | 14 Participants |
| History of other peripheral vascular surgery - Limb Treated Both | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| History of other peripheral vascular surgery - Limb Treated Non-Target Limb | 16 Participants | 7 Participants | 9 Participants |
| History of other peripheral vascular surgery - Limb Treated Target Limb | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants |
| History of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) | 66 Participants | 22 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Neurologic/Renal History History of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) | 28 Participants | 11 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Neurologic/Renal History History of Renal Insufficiency | 34 Participants | 11 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Neurologic/Renal History History of Renal Percutaneous Intervention | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Neurologic/Renal History History of Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIA) | 11 Participants | 3 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Asian | 51 Participants | 18 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Black, of African heritage | 25 Participants | 10 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Caucasian | 104 Participants | 35 Participants | 69 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino | 11 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Not Disclosed | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race/Ethnicity Other | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Europe | 26 Participants | 9 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 50 Participants | 17 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 125 Participants | 45 Participants | 80 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 51 Participants | 16 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 150 Participants | 55 Participants | 95 Participants |
| Smoking Current | 45 Participants | 18 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Smoking Never | 54 Participants | 18 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Smoking Previous | 101 Participants | 35 Participants | 66 Participants |
| Smoking Unknown | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 11 / 130 | 7 / 71 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 84 / 130 | 37 / 71 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 82 / 130 | 51 / 71 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE)
The primary safety endpoint assesses freedom from major adverse events (MAE) at 12 months post-procedure. (MAE is defined as: above ankle amputation in index limb; major re-intervention; and perioperative (30 day) mortality)
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Number of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE) | 109 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE) | 61 Participants |
Number of Participants With Primary Patency
Twelve-Month Primary Patency defined as a binary endpoint to be determined via duplex ultrasound (DUS) measuring flow at the 12-month follow-up visit, in the absence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass of the target lesion. Data table consists of the number of participants with flow as assessed by DUS.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Primary Patency | 70 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Primary Patency | 38 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Were Admitted to the Hospital Within 30 Days After the Index Procedure.
Hospitalizations related to Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) due to target lesion revascularization (TLR)/target vessel revascularization (TVR) or Target Limb Major Amputation or Procedure/Device related Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to 30 days post procedure
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Number of Participants Who Were Admitted to the Hospital Within 30 Days After the Index Procedure. | 2 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants Who Were Admitted to the Hospital Within 30 Days After the Index Procedure. | 3 Participants |
Number of Participants With Assisted Primary Patency
Assisted primary patency defined as the percentage (%) of lesions without clinically-driven TLR and those with clinically-driven TLR (not due to complete occlusion or by-pass) which show flow by DUS without restenosis.
Time frame: 12 months post procedure
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Assisted Primary Patency | 75 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Assisted Primary Patency | 41 Participants |
Number of Participants With Baseline Wounds Assessed as Healed
Wounds assessed for healed status by Independent Wound Assessors, blinded to randomized treatment.
Time frame: 12 months post procedure
Population: Data for baseline wounds assessed as healed are based on subjects with the data point collected.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Baseline Wounds Assessed as Healed | 34 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Baseline Wounds Assessed as Healed | 15 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization
Clinically-driven target lesion revascularization is defined as any surgical or percutaneous intervention to the target lesion after the index procedure if: 1. Occurring within 5mm proximal or distal to the original treatment segment with diameter stenosis ≥50% by quantitative angiography and if participant has recurrent symptoms OR 2. In-lesion diameter stenosis less than 50% might also be considered a MAE by the CEC if the subject has recurrent symptoms. Recurrent symptoms are defined as having ≥ 1 change in Rutherford Classification or associated with decreased ABI/TBI of ≥20% or ≥ 0.15 in the treated segment.
Time frame: 12 months post procedure
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization | 21 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization | 10 Participants |
Number of Participants With Hemodynamic Improvement
Hemodynamic improvement is defined as improvement of ankle-brachial index (ABI) by ≥0.10 or to an ABI ≥0.90 as compared to pre-procedure value without the need for repeat revascularization.
Time frame: 12 months post procedure
Population: Data for Hemodynamic Improvement are based on subjects with the data point collected.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Hemodynamic Improvement | 59 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Hemodynamic Improvement | 28 Participants |
Number of Participants With Major Amputation (Defined as Amputation of the Lower Limb at the Ankle Level or Above)
Rates of amputation of the lower limb at the ankle level or above
Time frame: 12 months post procedure
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Major Amputation (Defined as Amputation of the Lower Limb at the Ankle Level or Above) | 3 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Major Amputation (Defined as Amputation of the Lower Limb at the Ankle Level or Above) | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events
Adverse events (AEs) to be classified as major (defined as above ankle amputation of the index limb, major re-intervention (new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft, or thrombectomy/thrombolysis) and perioperative (30 day) mortality), serious, non-serious, unanticipated, procedure-related and device-related.
Time frame: 12 months post procedure
Population: The data presented in this table for the serious, non-serious, unanticipated, device-related, and procedure-related events are based on crude event rates, and the data used for the major events is based on the subjects evaluable for the primary safety endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Serious | 82 Participants |
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Non serious | 84 Participants |
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Major | 10 Participants |
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Unanticipated | 0 Participants |
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Device-Related | 16 Participants |
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Procedure-Related | 21 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Device-Related | 6 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Serious | 51 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Unanticipated | 0 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Non serious | 37 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Procedure-Related | 16 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events | Major | 3 Participants |
Number of Participants With Rate of Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification From Baseline
Endpoint determined to be a success when there is an improvement in Rutherford Classification of one or more categories as compared to pre-procedure without the need for repeat TLR. Rutherford Classifications: i. Category 0 - Asymptomatic ii. Category 1 - Mild claudication iii. Category 2 - Moderate claudication iv. Category 3 - Severe claudication v. Category 4 - Ischemic rest pain vi. Category 5 - Minor tissue loss - nonhealing ulcer, focal gangrene vii. Category 6 - Major tissue loss - extending above transmetatarsal (TM) level
Time frame: 12 months post procedure
Population: Data for Rate of Primary Sustained clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification from baseline are based on subjects with the data point collected
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Number of Participants With Rate of Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification From Baseline | 80 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Number of Participants With Rate of Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification From Baseline | 36 Participants |
Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality-of-life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 5 responses. The responses record 5 levels of severity (no problems/slight problems/moderate problems/severe problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension). The levels are assigned a numeric code 1-5 (eg, 1= no problems and 5= extreme problems).
Time frame: 12 months post procedure
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | Self-Care Improvement | 19 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | Pain/Discomfort Improvement | 48 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | Usual Activities Improvement | 32 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | Anxiety/Depression Improvement | 28 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | Mobility Improvement | 40 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | Anxiety/Depression Improvement | 12 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | Mobility Improvement | 16 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | Self-Care Improvement | 8 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | Usual Activities Improvement | 17 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire. | Pain/Discomfort Improvement | 18 Participants |
Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.
Changes in quality of life is measured using the Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) questionnaire, which is a 25 item questionnaire used to measure the quality-of-life in patients with lower limb ischemia. The tool is sub-divided into 5 domains: pain, symptoms, activities, social and emotional.
Time frame: 12 months post procedure
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in restricted in spending time with friends or relatives | 44 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to climb stairs | 47 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in cold feet have given | 50 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to participate in social activities | 49 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in pain in the foot (or leg) after going to bed at night | 58 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to do routine household work | 54 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in pain in the foot (or leg) when resting | 67 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ulcers or sores on my leg (or foot) caused pain or distress | 45 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in pins and needles or numbness in leg (or foot) have caused | 53 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in the range of activities that would have liked to do | 58 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to exercise or to play sports | 56 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in problems caused by poor circulation made feel frustrated | 60 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in the distance I can walk has improved | 39 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in pain in the leg (or foot) given | 63 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in worried that I might injure my leg | 42 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in felt guilty about relying on friends or relatives | 47 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to walk | 59 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to go shopping or carry bags | 50 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in legs felt tired or weak | 55 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in worried in danger of losing a part of leg or foot | 58 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in being (or becoming) housebound has concerned | 42 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in distance I can walk became less | 48 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in pain in leg (or foot) when walking | 61 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in depressed about the poor circulation in legs | 57 Participants |
| DES BTK | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in concerned about having poor circulation in legs | 68 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in depressed about the poor circulation in legs | 28 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in pain in leg (or foot) when walking | 27 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in worried that I might injure my leg | 21 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in cold feet have given | 26 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to exercise or to play sports | 21 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in legs felt tired or weak | 26 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in restricted in spending time with friends or relatives | 18 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in pain in the foot (or leg) after going to bed at night | 31 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in pins and needles or numbness in leg (or foot) have caused | 26 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in the distance I can walk has improved | 17 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to walk | 25 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in being (or becoming) housebound has concerned | 28 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in pain in the foot (or leg) when resting | 31 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to climb stairs | 20 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to participate in social activities | 23 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to do routine household work | 22 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ulcers or sores on my leg (or foot) caused pain or distress | 15 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in the range of activities that would have liked to do | 26 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in problems caused by poor circulation made feel frustrated | 29 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in pain in the leg (or foot) given | 30 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in felt guilty about relying on friends or relatives | 28 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in ability to go shopping or carry bags | 21 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in worried in danger of losing a part of leg or foot | 28 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in distance I can walk became less | 25 Participants |
| Conventional PTA | Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire. | Improvement in concerned about having poor circulation in legs | 26 Participants |