Skip to content

Patient Perception and Clinical Efficacy of a Collagen Matrix for the Treatment of Peri-implantitis

Patient Perception and Clinical Efficacy of Geistlich Mucograft® vs. Autologous Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Peri-implantitis: Multi-centre Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03551145
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-06-11
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2020-03-01
Last updated
2018-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peri-Implantitis

Brief summary

This is a multi-centre, randomized clinical trial which evaluates the efficiency of the collagen xenograft (Muco-Graft®) in comparison to the autologous connective tissue graft for the augmentation of keratinized mucosa and gaining hygienic access to the implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis.

Detailed description

Nowadays, there is not enough evidence that evaluates the patient's perception of utilizing the soft tissue substitutes in comparison to the autologous connective tissue graft for the augmentation of the keratinized mucosa and gain of hygienic access to the implants with infectious pathology and with minimum or absent keratinized mucosa. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate the change of clinical parameters of peri-implant health and the patient perception of the procedure for augmentation of the keratinized tissues around dental implants with peri-implantitis. The hypothesis is that collagen matrix of porcine origin is associated with lower patient morbidity, in comparison with autologous connective-tissue graft, when used for the augmentation of the keratinized tissues around endosseous dental implants with infectious pathology and with minimum or absent KT mucosa. A sample 48 patients will be recruited basing upon the diagnosis of peri-implantitis and absent or insufficient peri- implant mucosa. 1 month after the non-surgical treatment, surgical procedure will be performed. Peri-implant clinical and radiographic parameters, as well as patient perception of the therapy provided, will be evaluated before and at various stages (up to 52 weeks) after the surgical intervention. Also, change of vestibulum depth will be analyzed, as well as the time spent for the procedure measured.

Interventions

OTHERAcellular collagen matrix

3D collagen matrix consists of the collagen porcine type I and III

OTHERAutogenous free gingival graft

Autogenous graft harvested from the posterior palate

Sponsors

PerioCentrum Research
CollaboratorOTHER
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The examiners will be blinded. Envelopes will be prepared by a research assistant not involved as clinician or examiner. The clinicians involved will have no access to the data collection sheets or the group allocation, whilst the examiners will have no access to the patients' treatment notes or group allocation. The examiners will be blinded with regards to the participant treatment assignments. The measures will include no access to the dental records as to which treatment has been assigned. The patients are not to reveal their treatment assignment to the examiners. Unblinding is expected when patients present with adverse outcomes during the course of the study, e.g., emphysema.

Intervention model description

Multi-centre randomized clinical trial (2 centres) with the duration of 102 weeks for the evaluation of efficiency on the new collagen xenograft (Muco-Graft®) in comparison to the autologous connective tissue graft for the augmentation of keratinized mucosa and gaining hygienic access to the implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent after the detailed information on the study. * Adults aged at least 18 years old. * Candidates for receiving augmentation of the peri-implant keratinized mucosa. * Presence of the implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis (radiographic bone loss \> 2 mm, with a probing depth \> 5 mm, bleeding and/or suppuration (Lang et al., 2011)). * Absent or insufficient keratinized peri-implant mucosa (\<2 mm).

Exclusion criteria

* General contraindications for the dental/surgical treatment; * Inflammatory or autoimmune disease of the oral cavity; * Implant with radiographic intraosseous defects more than 3 mm; * Smokers \> 10 cig/day; * Allergy to collagen or analgesics/anti-inflammatory non-steroid drugs; * History of cancer in various parts of the body which required radiotherapy or chemotherapy during the last 5 years; * Radiotherapy of the head or neck in the last 5 years; * Actual medication with immunosuppressors, bisphosphonates or high doses of corticosteroids; * Pregnant or lactating women; * Women in fertile age, who do not use effective methods of contraception; * Participants of other studies of biomedical investigation during the last 24 weeks before initiation of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in width of keratinized peri-implant mucosaBaseline, 0, 1, 2, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeksMeasured by periodontal probe (UNC-15), as mm of keratinized mucosa in the midbuccal portion of the implant of interest

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Probing depthBaseline, 0, 1, 2, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeksMeasured by periodontal probe (UNC-15) in millimeters in 6 points around each implant, and defined as a distance from the mucosal margin to the bottom of the peri-implant pocket
RecessionBaseline, 0, 1, 2, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeksMeasured by periodontal probe (UNC-15) in millimeters in 6 points around each implant, and defined as a distance from the implant platform to the mucosal margin
Bleeding on probingBaseline, 0, 1, 2, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeksMeasured as presence or absence (binary value) of bleeding 10 seconds after probing with the periodontal probe in 6 point around each implant
Duration of surgeryafter completion of surgical interventionMeasured by the electronic timer in minutes, starting from the moment of first incision and ending with a last suture
Vestibulum depthBaseline, 0, 1, 2, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeksMeasured in mm by a periodontal probe, as a distance from the mucosal margin to the point of greatest concavity of the mucobuccal fold
General satisfaction by the treatment0, 1, 2, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeksMeasured by a questionnaire, using the visual analogue scale, in values from 0 to 100

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactMyroslav Solonko, DDS
msolonko@gmail.com34684354549
Backup ContactAlberto Ortiz-Vigón, PhD
alberto@ortizvigon.com‭34 629 755 893‬

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026