Skip to content

Fatigue Management Programs for People With MS

Comparing the Effectiveness of Fatigue Management Programs for People With MS

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03550170
Enrollment
590
Registered
2018-06-08
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2023-04-28
Last updated
2025-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Fatigue, Wellness, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of life

Brief summary

This is a multi-site randomized clinical trial comparing 3 modes of delivering the Managing Fatigue course for reducing fatigue in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). The primary hypothesis is that the teleconference and internet versions of the course will be noninferior to the one-on-one, in person version in terms of the primary outcome of fatigue and secondary outcome of quality of life.

Detailed description

Fatigue is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). MS fatigue can impact all aspects of quality of life, including physical, mental, and social function. MS fatigue is a profound barrier to participating in meaningful activities, such as employment and hobbies. Currently, the FDA has not approved medications for MS fatigue in the United States (US). However, there are empirically tested, non-pharmacological strategies that can support people with MS in reducing the impact of fatigue. Thus, the aim of the study is to compare 3 modes of delivering the Managing Fatigue course-2 telerehabilitation formats (teleconference and internet) and 1-to-1, in-person format (traditional mode of clinical service delivery)-upon outcomes important to people with MS, i.e., fatigue and its impact on physical, mental, and social function. The intervention arms will focus on reducing fatigue as a strategy to directly improve physical, mental and social functioning.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTeleconference

This intervention arm will be a 6-week, group-based course involving weekly 80-min teleconference sessions. It will be delivered in small groups (6-12 participants) to maximize participants' opportunities for interaction. A program manual divided into 6 sections, 1 for each week that includes worksheets and homework activities will be given to the participants. Occupational therapists will facilitate the sessions. Participants and the OT will dial into 1-800 conference call line on the designated date and time.

BEHAVIORALInternet

The internet course is similar to the teleconference format. It will occur in a 6-week period and be group based; i.e., 8-12 participants will begin the intervention at the same time and interact with each other during the 6-week period. Participants will be given a username and a password to view a different session each week at a time convenient for them. Each session will include completing practice activities and sharing information (e.g., offering advice and support to one another through the discussion forum). OTs will facilitate the discussions by responding to entries, asking questions, and providing encouragement to complete sessions.

BEHAVIORAL1-to-1, in-person or videoconference

Unlike the teleconference and internet courses, the number and length of sessions for the 1-to-1, in-person or videoconference course will vary over the 6-week period. The OT will cover all 6 topics, but the pace will be tailored to the participants' needs and preferences. Thus, although the topics are consistent, OTs are able to spend more time on topics that participants find pertinent to their situations. The participant and OT will be instructed to meet at least 3 times with at least 7 days between each session.

Sponsors

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Illinois at Chicago
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Minnesota
CollaboratorOTHER
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
CollaboratorOTHER
Dalhousie University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Case Western Reserve University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Self-report diagnosis of MS * Age ≥ 18 years * Fatigue Severity Scale score ≥ 4 * Ability to speak English

Exclusion criteria

* Individual must be capable of providing consent (Assessed with questionnaire) * Unable to access the internet or unable to travel to in-person sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Fatigue LevelsChange from baseline to 6 monthsFatigue will be assessed with Fatigue Impact Scale. Fatigue Impact Scale is a 40-item questionnaire that measures impact of fatigue on day-to-day life. Scale ranges from no problem (0) to extreme problem (4). Total scores will be computed by summing responses for each item. Scores can range from 0 to 160 with a higher score indicating worse fatigue.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life: Psychological CompositeChange from baseline to 6 monthsMultiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS) was used to measure health-related quality of life. It consists of 29 self-report questions. The psychological composite score is calculated on a scale between 1 and 100. Higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Enrolled participants would only be excluded from the study before assignment to groups if they did not meet the inclusion criteria stated in the protocol.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Teleconference
Teleconference Intervention arm Teleconference: This intervention arm will be a 6-week, group-based course involving weekly 80-min teleconference sessions. It will be delivered in small groups (6-12 participants) to maximize participants' opportunities for interaction. A program manual divided into 6 sections, 1 for each week that includes worksheets and homework activities will be given to the participants. Occupational therapists will facilitate the sessions. Participants and the OT will dial into 1-800 conference call line on the designated date and time.
196
Internet
Internet Intervention arm Internet: The internet course is similar to the teleconference format. It will occur in a 6-week period and be group based; i.e., 8-12 participants will begin the intervention at the same time and interact with each other during the 6-week period. Participants will be given a username and a password to view a different session each week at a time convenient for them. Each session will include completing practice activities and sharing information (e.g., offering advice and support to one another through the discussion forum). OTs will facilitate the discussions by responding to entries, asking questions, and providing encouragement to complete sessions.
197
One-to-One
One-to-One intervention arm One-to-one: Unlike the teleconference and internet courses, the number and length of sessions for the 1-to-1, in-person or videoconference course will vary over the 6-week period. The OT will cover all 6 topics, but the pace will be tailored to the participants' needs and preferences. Thus, although the topics are consistent, OTs are able to spend more time on topics that participants find pertinent to their situations. The participant and OT will be instructed to meet at least 3 times with at least 7 days between each session.
197
Total590

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTeleconferenceInternetOne-to-OneTotal
Age, Continuous52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Fatigue Impact Scale68.62 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.78
67.73 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.03
68.10 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.61
68.15 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.42
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
24 Participants23 Participants23 Participants70 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
4 Participants8 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing Race
0 Participants4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiracial
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic
191 Participants188 Participants187 Participants566 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
165 Participants166 Participants171 Participants502 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
166 Participants158 Participants161 Participants485 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants39 Participants36 Participants105 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1960 / 1970 / 197
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1960 / 1970 / 197
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1960 / 1970 / 197

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Fatigue Levels

Fatigue will be assessed with Fatigue Impact Scale. Fatigue Impact Scale is a 40-item questionnaire that measures impact of fatigue on day-to-day life. Scale ranges from no problem (0) to extreme problem (4). Total scores will be computed by summing responses for each item. Scores can range from 0 to 160 with a higher score indicating worse fatigue.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TeleconferenceChange From Baseline in Fatigue Levels50.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
InternetChange From Baseline in Fatigue Levels56.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
One-to-oneChange From Baseline in Fatigue Levels57.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Comparison: A generalized estimating equation (GEE) served as the primary analysis tool for modeling the longitudinal scores of the primary outcome - Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS).90% CI: [0.67, 9.11]
Comparison: A generalized estimating equation (GEE) served as the primary analysis tool for modeling the longitudinal scores of the primary outcome - Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS).90% CI: [0.98, 11.26]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life: Psychological Composite

Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS) was used to measure health-related quality of life. It consists of 29 self-report questions. The psychological composite score is calculated on a scale between 1 and 100. Higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Change from baseline to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TeleconferenceChange From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life: Psychological Composite40.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.05
InternetChange From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life: Psychological Composite38.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
One-to-oneChange From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life: Psychological Composite37.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.68
p-value: 0.1ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026