Skip to content

Subthalamic Steering for Therapy Optimization in Parkinson's Disease

Subthalamic Steering for Therapy Optimization in Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03548506
Acronym
SANTOP
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-06-07
Start date
2018-04-19
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2026-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

STN, DBS, steering, segmented electrode leads

Brief summary

Twenty patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) will be included into this single center randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial (RCT) in a cross-over design. The treatment consists of two different stimulation settings using (i) conventional omnidirectional stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus \[STN\_O\] as active comparator and (ii) directional steering of STN stimulation via a segmented electrode contact \[STN\_D\].

Detailed description

Twenty PD patients will be enrolled in this cross-over double-blind RCT to evaluate both the safety and efficacy of directional STN stimulation \[STN\_D\] compared with standard omnidirectional STN stimulation \[STN\_O\]. The primary outcome measure is objectively quantified muscle rigidity of the upper extremity, i.e., surface EMG recordings of the biceps and triceps muscle during standardized extension/flexion of the elbow joint (Levin et al., 2009) assessed 6 months after implantation in cross-over design. The trial is designed to detect with an 80% power a change of 0.27 mA of the therapeutic stimulation threshold with two-tailed P \< 0.05 (Wilcoxon rank sum test). Secondary outcome measures address clinical motor, non-motor, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms, freezing of gait, and quality of life. Visits are scheduled at weeks 1 (V1), 6 (V2), 24 (V3), 27 (V4), and 30 (V5) from baseline (V0).

Interventions

DEVICEOmnidirectional Deep Brain Stimulation of STN

Deep Brain Stimulation

DEVICEDirectional Deep Brain Stimulation of STN

Deep Brain Stimulation

Sponsors

University Hospital Tuebingen
Lead SponsorOTHER
Abbott
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent * Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (according to the "British Brain Bank criteria" (Hughes, 1992) including genetic forms

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Exam \< 20) * Suicidality, Psychosis * Other severe pathological chronic condition that might confound treatment effects or interpretation of the data * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle Rigidity6 months post-operativelySurface-Electromyography (EMG) of M. biceps brachii and M. triceps brachii

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical motor and non-motor symptoms (1)6 months post-operativelyMDS-UPDRS I
Clinical motor and non-motor symptoms (2)6 months post-operativelyMDS-UPDRS II
Clinical motor and non-motor symptoms (3)6 months post-operativelyMDS-UPDRS III
Clinical motor and non-motor symptoms (4)6 months post-operativelyMDS-UPDRS IV
Clinical motor and non-motor symptoms (5)6 months post-operativelyBradykinesia evaluation
Clinical motor and non-motor symptoms (6)6 months post-operativelyTremor evaluation
Clinical motor and non-motor symptoms (7)6 months post-operativelyDeep brain stimulation impairment scale (DBS-IS): * the scale consists of 22 questions and 6 subscales; * subscales: 1. postural instability and gait difficulties (range 0-20), 2. cognitive impaiment (range 0-20), 3. speaking problems (range 0-12), 4. apathy (range 0-12), 5. impulsivity (range 0-12), and 6. difficulties related to DBS device (range 0-12); * Ʃ 1-6 DBS-IS total range: 0-88; * Ʃ 1-5 DBS-IS total range: 0-76; * higher values represent worsening of symptoms
Clinical motor and non-motor symptoms (8)6 months post-operativelyClinical global impression self
Neurocognitive and non-motor symptoms (1)6 months post-operativelyModulation range
Neurocognitive and non-motor symptoms (2)6 months post-operativelySpatial with a visual Odd-Ball test
Neurocognitive and non-motor symptoms (3)6 months post-operativelyVerbal Working Memory with an auditory Odd-Ball test
Neurocognitive and non-motor symptoms (4)6 months post-operativelyPower of Attention (Cognitive Drug Research Battery)
Neurocognitive and non-motor symptoms (5)6 months post-operativelyDigit Vigilance Accuracy (Cognitive Drug Research Battery)
Neurocognitive and non-motor symptoms (6)6 months post-operativelyExecutive functions with One Touch Tower of London (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, CANTAB)
Neurocognitive and non-motor symptoms (7)6 months post-operativelyMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (1)6 months post-operativelyBeck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (2)6 months post-operativelyApathy Scale/Lille Apathy rating scale/Neuropsychiatric inventory
Freezing of gait (1)6 months post-operativelyCapsit-PD
Freezing of gait (2)6 months post-operativelyFreezing of Gait Assessment Course
Quality of Life6 months post-operativelyParkinson's Disease Questionaire (PDQ-39)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAlireza Gharabaghi, MD

Division of Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Tuebingen, Germany

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDaniel Weiss, MD

Department for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Centre for Neurology, Tuebingen, Germany, and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 2, 2026