Skip to content

Comparing Effectiveness of Duloxetine and Desipramine in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Pragmatic Trial Using Point of Care Randomization

Comparing Effectiveness of Duloxetine and Desipramine in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Pragmatic Trial Using Point of Care Randomization

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03548454
Enrollment
86
Registered
2018-06-07
Start date
2018-09-20
Completion date
2024-06-26
Last updated
2025-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Brief summary

Over 100 million Americans suffer from chronic pain resulting in annual cost of roughly $635 billion. Limited treatments are available for this widespread disease. The data supporting these treatments lack generalizability to patients with more serious medical and psychological comorbidities who are often excluded from explanatory efficacy trials. Our work aims to integrate randomized comparative effectiveness research with patient care. The investigators will randomize the patients and collect data using an open-source learning healthcare system already in use in our department to monitor patients' progress: Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry (CHOIR). Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry uses the National Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System item banks for comparative metrics through computer adaptive testing. The investigators will leverage the advantage of this novel system to compare effectiveness of duloxetine and desipramine in decreasing pain in patients with chronic pain. The investigators will also compare adherence of patients to these two commonly used medications over a period of six months. This will evaluate feasibility of integrating randomized comparative effectiveness research with patient care in subspecialty clinics. Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry can then be applied for numerous future trials to advance our knowledge in perioperative and pain medicine.

Interventions

DRUGDuloxetine

Open label prescription

DRUGDesipramine

Open label prescription

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age of 18 years old or above 2. Persistent pain for more than 3 months 3. Candidate for treatment by anti-depressant based on treating pain provider

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior failure of duloxetine and/or desipramine (patients who have failed other TCAs or SNRIs can be considered for the trial based on the reason for previous medication failure) 2. Contraindication to taking duloxetine or desipramine 3. Patient refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensitybaseline and 6 monthsPercent of participants in each arm that had more than 30% reduction in pain intensity. Participants rated their pain on an 11-point scale (0 to 10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical FunctionBaseline and 6 monthsNational Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for physical function. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to better function.
Pain InterferenceBaseline and 6 monthsNational Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for pain interference. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to worse pain interference.
DepressionBaseline and 6 monthsNational Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for depression. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to more severe depression.
AnxietyBaseline and 6 monthsNational Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for anxiety. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to more severe anxiety.
AdherenceMonthly for 6 monthsNumber of participants who completed 6-month therapy based on prescription records.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Patients were equally randomized to duloxetine and desipramine (43 in each arm); however, five patients chose not to take desipramine and crossed over to the duloxetine group before starting study medication.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Desipramine
Desipramine starting at 25 mg per day and increasing to 75 mg per day as tolerated.
38
Duloxetine
Duloxetine starting at 20 mg per day and increasing to 60 mg per day as tolerated.
48
Total86

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDuloxetineTotalDesipramine
Age, Continuous47.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.67
47.48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.62
47.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.36
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants15 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants60 Participants29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants11 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown/Refused
9 Participants11 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
26 Participants44 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
48 Participants86 Participants38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants47 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants39 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 48
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 384 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Intensity

Percent of participants in each arm that had more than 30% reduction in pain intensity. Participants rated their pain on an 11-point scale (0 to 10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable).

Time frame: baseline and 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DesipraminePain Intensity11 Participants
DuloxetinePain Intensity29 Participants
Secondary

Adherence

Number of participants who completed 6-month therapy based on prescription records.

Time frame: Monthly for 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DesipramineAdherence18 Participants
DuloxetineAdherence24 Participants
Secondary

Anxiety

National Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for anxiety. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to more severe anxiety.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DesipramineAnxietyBaseline54.39 T-scoreStandard Deviation 10.21
DesipramineAnxiety6-month54.97 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.65
DesipramineAnxietyChange from baseline at 6-month-1.2 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.11
DuloxetineAnxietyBaseline54.65 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.99
DuloxetineAnxiety6-month54.01 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.72
DuloxetineAnxietyChange from baseline at 6-month-1.29 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.89
Secondary

Depression

National Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for depression. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to more severe depression.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DesipramineDepressionBaseline52.98 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.4
DesipramineDepression6-month52.54 T-scoreStandard Deviation 9.7
DesipramineDepressionChange from baseline at 6-month-3.24 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.58
DuloxetineDepressionBaseline54.24 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.89
DuloxetineDepression6-month53.39 T-scoreStandard Deviation 11.93
DuloxetineDepressionChange from baseline at 6-month-1.14 T-scoreStandard Deviation 12.83
Secondary

Pain Interference

National Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for pain interference. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to worse pain interference.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DesipraminePain InterferenceBaseline64.37 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.1
DesipraminePain Interference6-month60.82 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.1
DesipraminePain InterferenceChange from baseline at 6-month-4.29 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.57
DuloxetinePain InterferenceBaseline64.93 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.48
DuloxetinePain Interference6-month62.11 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.98
DuloxetinePain InterferenceChange from baseline at 6-month-4.06 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.51
Secondary

Physical Function

National Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for physical function. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to better function.

Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

Population: Participants with data at the respective time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DesipraminePhysical FunctionBaseline39.29 T-scoreStandard Deviation 7.63
DesipraminePhysical Function6-month41.9 T-scoreStandard Deviation 8.91
DesipraminePhysical FunctionChange from baseline at 6-month2.54 T-scoreStandard Deviation 5.83
DuloxetinePhysical FunctionBaseline39.07 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.33
DuloxetinePhysical Function6-month39.39 T-scoreStandard Deviation 6.98
DuloxetinePhysical FunctionChange from baseline at 6-month1.36 T-scoreStandard Deviation 3.88

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026