Skip to content

Effects of Platelet-rich Plasma in the Surgery of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Platelet-rich Plasma in the Surgery of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03548259
Acronym
PRP-CTS
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-06-07
Start date
2018-06-05
Completion date
2018-11-05
Last updated
2019-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Keywords

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Platelet-rich plasma, Surgery

Brief summary

The Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been proved to be efficient in the non-surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Here we propose to assess the effectiveness of PRP as co-adjuvant in surgical treatment of CTS by open carpal tunnel release. Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Local Hospital.

Detailed description

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common disorder with an estimated annual incidence of 125-542 in adults, and an estimated prevalence of 1 to 5 percent in the general population. CTS is the most frequent compressive focal mononeuropathy and causes pain, paresthesia and weakness of the median nerve distribution in patients. The treatment of the CTS includes both, conservative and surgical treatment depending on the severity of the symptoms. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been proved to be efficient in the non-surgical treatment of CTS, however its potential used as co-adjuvant in surgical treatment has not been assessed. We propose a randomized clinical trial in patients in which the surgical treatment is indicated. Participants in the intervention group receive a PRP injection, and in the control group a platelet-poor plasma injection after open carpal tunnel release. The evaluation is performed pretreatment as well as on the 6st week after treatment. Outcome measures include: hand grip strength (primary outcome), pain, sympton severity and functional status.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPlatelet-rich plasma

Platelet-rich plasma injection

Platelet-poor plasma injection

Sponsors

Cardenal Herrera University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double blind

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial (Parallel Assignment)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) * Conservative treatment failure

Exclusion criteria

* Previous CTS surgery on the same side * Wrist fracture/trauma in history * Polyneuropathy * Diabetes mellitus * Cervical neuropathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hand grip strength6 weeksHand grip strength measured with dynamometer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain6 weeksPain measured with the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. The scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0 which represents no hurt to a crying face at 10 which represents hurts worst.
Sympton severity6 weeksSympton severity measured with the sympton severity scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire. The Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) contains 11 questions and uses a five-point rating scale that generates a final score (sum of individual scores divided by number of items) which ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Functional status6 weeksFunctional status measured with the sympton severity scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire.The Functional Status Scale (FSS) contains 8 items and uses a five-point rating scale that generates a final score (sum of individual scores divided by number of items) which ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability.
Wound healing6 weeksWound healing measured with the Southampton Wound Assessment Scale. Wounds are scored as 0, I, II, III, IV and V, with a higher score indicating worst healing.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026