Skip to content

Tuned Versus Untuned Ankle-foot Orthoses in Children and Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy

Tuned Versus Untuned Ankle-foot Orthoses in Children and Adolescents With Cerebral palsy_AFO-Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03547674
Acronym
AFO
Enrollment
5
Registered
2018-06-06
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2024-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Brief summary

Cerebral palsy (CP) in children and adolescents is frequently accompanied by gait abnormalities. Ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) have been suggested to improve the gait pattern. Compared to conventional AFO, modular AFO offer the opportunity to tune its response to the patient's gait characteristics and/or functional maturity. However, the evidence level is still small and AFO tuning is not yet established in clinical routine. The study will investigate individual tuning of custom-built ankle-foot-orthoses (AFO) using gait analyses

Interventions

Gait analysis under 4 conditions (barefoot, shoes only, untuned AFO with shoes, tuned AFO with shoes) will be performed in a random order.

OTHERshoes only

Gait analysis under 4 conditions (barefoot, shoes only, untuned AFO with shoes, tuned AFO with shoes) will be performed in a random order.

OTHERuntuned AFO with shoes

Gait analysis under 4 conditions (barefoot, shoes only, untuned AFO with shoes, tuned AFO with shoes) will be performed in a random order. AFO are walking aids to improve gait pathologies. They are custom-built using plaster casts. AFO for equinus and/or drop foot pathologies are specifically indicated to control excessive ankle plantar flexion. Push-up elements that return the energy from the stance-phase to support lifting the foot during the swing-phase (similar to a spring) are used.

OTHERtuned AFO with shoes

Gait analysis under 4 conditions (barefoot, shoes only, untuned AFO with shoes, tuned AFO with shoes) will be performed in a random order. Modular AFO tuning means that patients try different pushup elements with varying stiffness and design before the final design is determined.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Gait analysis under 4 conditions (barefoot, shoes only, untuned AFO with shoes, tuned AFO with shoes) will be performed in a random order: To determine the order, the 4 conditions will be noted on a piece of paper and randomly picked from an envelope.

Intervention model description

Prospective, cross-sectional within-subjects comparison

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients in outpatient treatment from the University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB) * Informed Consent provided as documented by signature * Confirmed diagnosis of cerebral palsy * Confirmed diagnosis of spastic equinus and/ or drop foot, * Gait pathologies treated with conventional AFO * Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I or II

Exclusion criteria

* Other neuromuscular diseases * Previous surgical treatment to improve gait pathologies * Injections of Botulinum toxin 6 month prior to study inclusion * Inability or unwillingness to follow the procedures of the gait analysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
gait profile score (GPS)at end of study, an average of 1 monthoverall score calculated from all kinematic parameters (joint rotation angles) of the affected leg and expressed as the deviation from the normal gait cycle in degrees. The mean GPS was anticipated to be 9° with standard deviation of 1.4° \[2\]. A good (r = 0.5) correlation of GPS for the within-subjects comparison was assumed. The non-inferiority margin was set at the minimally clinically important difference of 1.6°.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Movement analysis profile (MAP)at end of study, an average of 1 monthcalculated from kinematic parameters and expressed as the deviation from the normal gait cycle in degrees. The MAP consists of individual scores for each joint rotation angle (pelvic tilt, pelvic obliquity, pelvic rotation, hip flexion/extension, hip abduction/adduction, hip rotation, knee flexion/extension, ankle dorsiflexion/extension and foot progression) of the affected leg
spatio-temporal parameterat end of study, an average of 1 monthcalculated from kinematic parameters and expressed as the deviation from the normal gait cycle in degrees,Spatio-temporal parameters are walking speed (m/s), cadence (steps/min x 100) and stride length (m) of the affected leg

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026