Skip to content

Comparison of Modified Circular and Natural Tooth Brushing Methods in Effectiveness of Dental Plaque Removal

Comparison of Modified Circular and Natural Tooth Brushing Methods in Effectiveness of Dental Plaque Removal in Children Aged 10-12 Years Old

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03547531
Enrollment
124
Registered
2018-06-06
Start date
2017-08-02
Completion date
2017-09-06
Last updated
2019-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Brief summary

1. Plaque level in subjects using the Modified Circular method is different from that in subjects using natural tooth brushing method. 2. Gingivitis level in subjects using the Modified Circular method is different from that in subjects using natural tooth brushing method. 3. Level of plaque after using the Modified Circular method is different from that before using the method. 4. Level of gingivitis after using the Modified Circular method is different from that before using the method.

Detailed description

Dental caries and gingivitis prevalences in schoolchildren in Indonesia is high. Dental diseases can potentially caused missed school, concentration disturbance, impaired speech, poor self-esteem, and systemic illness. Caries and gingivitis can be prevented by maintaining oral hygiene. Toothbrushing is one of oral hygiene method to remove and prevent dental plaque that can cause dental caries and gingivitis. The aim of the study was to compare the level of plaque and gingivitis of children aged 10-12 years old that use the Modified Circular and natural tooth brushing methods. One hundred and twenty four students from two state elementary school in Yogyakarta, Indonesia participated in this study. The age of the participants were between 10 and 12 years old including males and females students. All of the participants were fifth graders from two elementary schools. To be eligible to participate in this study, each participants met the criteria including: students with age 10 to 12 years old and willing as well as permitted by the parents/guardian to join thorough the study. The exclusion criteria were being diagnosed having developmental disorder, using orthodontic appliances, and using antiseptic mouthwash for daily use. The study began with the baseline data collection. Then it continued with the training for the participants about improving the oral hygiene. Children will be instructed to brush their teeth two times a day in the morning and before bedtime with the duration of 2 minutes. The project provided one toothpaste and one toothbrush for each children. In this stage, the intervention group was demonstrated and instructed to brush their teeth using Modified Circular method, while the control group was not given any instruction to brush their teeth using a specific tooth brushing method and asked to brush their teeth using the way they brushing every day. The period of intervention was started after training and lasted for one month. In intervention period, intervention group was observed once a week to ensure that they brushed their teeth correctly using Modified Circular method. Finally the evaluation was implemented after 1 month of intervention. The duration of the trial was one month, started in 2 August 2017 and finished on 6 September 2017, and the study was finished in time. This study did not use any invasive treatment due to oral examination. No drugs or chemical materials were used except nontoxic disclosing agent that was used only 2-3 drops for staining the dental plaque. The colors of disclosing agent will gradually disapear and easily removed by brushing. The benefit of this study was to help teachers, parents, and students to know the level of oral cleanliness and the effective method of toothbrushing in order to maintain oral hygiene and prevent dental caries and gingivitis. The participants recruitment started after the research permission from government were accepted on 29 July 2017 until 31 July 2017. The schools selected then received the research permit from government and the research was started by giving the informed consent to the children and parents. The funding of this study is from Graduate School Prince of Songkla University Research Funding and Faculty of Dentistry Prince of Songkla University Research Funding. The principle investigator of this study (as the main contact) is Istiyanti Hapsari (e-mail istiyantihapsari@gmail.com).

Interventions

OTHERNatural Tooth Brushing Method

Natural tooth brushing method is the method that is naturally used by the people with horizontal, rotary, or simple up and down motions and any position of the brush without any instruction of particular tooth brushing method.

OTHERModified Circular Tooth Brushing Method

Modified Circular tooth brushing method is a combination of small circular motion of brushing with the position of the brush slightly reach underneath the gingival that are applied for each jaw in all facial surfaces and posterior lingual of tooth arches.

Sponsors

Prince of Songkla University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Examiner was blind to the allocation of the group

Intervention model description

the data were gathered from two groups of participants (control and intervention groups)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Students with age 10 to 12 years old and willing as well as permitted by the parents/guardian to join thorough the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Being diagnosed having developmental disorder, using orthodontic appliances, and using antiseptic mouthwash for daily use.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline Plaque LevelBaselinePlaque level is examined using Turesky Modification of Quigley-Hein Index. The scale is ranged from 0 to 5. 0 means no dental plaque existed on the tooth surface. 5 means all of the tooth surface is covered by dental plaque from the area that is closest to gingival to the occlusal area. The higher number of scores means worse. This index examines the buccal and lingual/palatal surfaces of the teeth (each teeth examined in 2 surfaces).
Baseline Gingival ConditionBaselineThe examination of gingival condition was using the Gingival Index by Silness and Loe. A score between 0 and 3 was given based on the criteria: 0= Normal gingiva. 1. Mild inflammation - slight change in color, slight edema. No bleeding on probing. 2. Moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing. Bleeding on probing. 3. Severe inflammation - marked redness and edema. Ulceration. Tendency to spontaneous bleeding. This scale examine each teeth in 4 surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual/palatal).
Plaque Level at 1 Monthone month after baseline data collectionPlaque level is examined using Turesky Modification of Quigley-Hein Index. The scale is ranged from 0 to 5. 0 means no dental plaque existed on the tooth surface. 5 means all of the tooth surface is covered by dental plaque from the area that is closest to gingival to the occlusal area. The higher number of scores means worse. This index examines the buccal and lingual/palatal surfaces of the teeth (each teeth examined in 2 surfaces).
Gingival Condition at 1 Monthone month after baseline data collectionThe examination of gingival condition was using the Gingival Index by Silness and Loe. A score between 0 and 3 was given based on the criteria: 0= Normal gingiva. 1. Mild inflammation - slight change in color, slight edema. No bleeding on probing. 2. Moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing. Bleeding on probing. 3. Severe inflammation - marked redness and edema. Ulceration. Tendency to spontaneous bleeding. This scale examine each teeth in 4 surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual/palatal).

Countries

Indonesia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All of the participants were fifth graders from 2 elementary schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. These two schools have the similar characteristics in social-economy, number of students, and the type of school based on the data and recommendation from Education and Culture Office of Sleman District, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Pre-assignment details

Each school had 62 fifth graders (total participants of both school was 124 fifth graders). No participants were excluded. Random group assignment was done by coin flipping to choose one school as control group and the other as intervention group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Natural Tooth Brushing Method
Natural tooth brushing method is the method that is naturally used by the people with horizontal, rotary, or simple up and down motions and any position of the brush without any instruction of particular tooth brushing method. Natural Tooth Brushing Method: Natural tooth brushing method is the method that is naturally used by the people with horizontal, rotary, or simple up and down motions and any position of the brush without any instruction of particular tooth brushing method.
62
Natural Tooth Brushing Method
Natural tooth brushing method is the method that is naturally used by the people with horizontal, rotary, or simple up and down motions and any position of the brush without any instruction of particular tooth brushing method. Natural Tooth Brushing Method: Natural tooth brushing method is the method that is naturally used by the people with horizontal, rotary, or simple up and down motions and any position of the brush without any instruction of particular tooth brushing method.
1,326
Modified Circular Tooth Brushing Method
Modified Circular tooth brushing method is a combination of small circular motion of brushing with the position of the brush slightly reach underneath the gingival that are applied for each jaw in all facial surfaces and posterior lingual of tooth arches. Modified Circular Tooth Brushing Method: Modified Circular tooth brushing method is a combination of small circular motion of brushing with the position of the brush slightly reach underneath the gingival that are applied for each jaw in all facial surfaces and posterior lingual of tooth arches.
62
Modified Circular Tooth Brushing Method
Modified Circular tooth brushing method is a combination of small circular motion of brushing with the position of the brush slightly reach underneath the gingival that are applied for each jaw in all facial surfaces and posterior lingual of tooth arches. Modified Circular Tooth Brushing Method: Modified Circular tooth brushing method is a combination of small circular motion of brushing with the position of the brush slightly reach underneath the gingival that are applied for each jaw in all facial surfaces and posterior lingual of tooth arches.
1,328
Total2,778

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyhaving family occasion02
Overall Studynot coming in data collection : sick22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicModified Circular Tooth Brushing MethodTotalNatural Tooth Brushing Method
Age, Customized
Age of participants
10.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.342
10.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.365
10.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.379
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Indonesia
62 Participants124 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants70 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants54 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 620 / 62
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 620 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 620 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Baseline Gingival Condition

The examination of gingival condition was using the Gingival Index by Silness and Loe. A score between 0 and 3 was given based on the criteria: 0= Normal gingiva. 1. Mild inflammation - slight change in color, slight edema. No bleeding on probing. 2. Moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing. Bleeding on probing. 3. Severe inflammation - marked redness and edema. Ulceration. Tendency to spontaneous bleeding. This scale examine each teeth in 4 surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual/palatal).

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Natural Tooth Brushing MethodBaseline Gingival Condition0.51 gingival indexStandard Deviation 0.28
Modified Circular Tooth Brushing MethodBaseline Gingival Condition0.49 gingival indexStandard Deviation 0.4
Comparison: null hypotesis: there is no difference of mean of gingival index between groupsp-value: >0.05t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Baseline Plaque Level

Plaque level is examined using Turesky Modification of Quigley-Hein Index. The scale is ranged from 0 to 5. 0 means no dental plaque existed on the tooth surface. 5 means all of the tooth surface is covered by dental plaque from the area that is closest to gingival to the occlusal area. The higher number of scores means worse. This index examines the buccal and lingual/palatal surfaces of the teeth (each teeth examined in 2 surfaces).

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Natural Tooth Brushing MethodBaseline Plaque Level2.25 plaque indexStandard Deviation 0.65
Modified Circular Tooth Brushing MethodBaseline Plaque Level2.28 plaque indexStandard Deviation 1.68
Comparison: Null hypothesis: the mean of plaque index between groups are not differentp-value: >0.05t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Gingival Condition at 1 Month

The examination of gingival condition was using the Gingival Index by Silness and Loe. A score between 0 and 3 was given based on the criteria: 0= Normal gingiva. 1. Mild inflammation - slight change in color, slight edema. No bleeding on probing. 2. Moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing. Bleeding on probing. 3. Severe inflammation - marked redness and edema. Ulceration. Tendency to spontaneous bleeding. This scale examine each teeth in 4 surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual/palatal).

Time frame: one month after baseline data collection

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Natural Tooth Brushing MethodGingival Condition at 1 Month0.49 gingival indexStandard Deviation 0.4
Modified Circular Tooth Brushing MethodGingival Condition at 1 Month0.28 gingival indexStandard Deviation 0.33
Comparison: null hypotesis: there is no difference of mean of gingival index between groupsp-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Plaque Level at 1 Month

Plaque level is examined using Turesky Modification of Quigley-Hein Index. The scale is ranged from 0 to 5. 0 means no dental plaque existed on the tooth surface. 5 means all of the tooth surface is covered by dental plaque from the area that is closest to gingival to the occlusal area. The higher number of scores means worse. This index examines the buccal and lingual/palatal surfaces of the teeth (each teeth examined in 2 surfaces).

Time frame: one month after baseline data collection

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Natural Tooth Brushing MethodPlaque Level at 1 Month2.28 plaque indexStandard Deviation 1.19
Modified Circular Tooth Brushing MethodPlaque Level at 1 Month1.68 plaque indexStandard Deviation 1.08
Comparison: null hypotesis: there is no difference of mean of plaque index between groupsp-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026