Skip to content

VitalScan MCG Rule-out Multi-centre Pivotal Study - US

A Prospective Multi-centre Observational Study to Validate the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Transportable Magnetocardiograph Device for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), Focusing on Rule-out Capability, in Patients Who Present to the Emergency Department With Chest Pain Symptoms Consistent With ACS

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03546933
Acronym
MAGNET ACS
Enrollment
651
Registered
2018-06-06
Start date
2018-07-17
Completion date
2019-08-06
Last updated
2019-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Brief summary

A prospective multi-centre observational study to validate the diagnostic accuracy of a transportable magnetocardiograph device for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), focusing on rule-out capability, in patients who present to the emergency department with chest pain symptoms consistent with ACS.

Interventions

A passive, non-contact, mobile medical device that measures, displays, stores, and retrieves magnetic fluctuations caused by heart activity at a patient's bedside.

Sponsors

University of Cincinnati
CollaboratorOTHER
Creavo Medical Technologies Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient presents to the ED with chest pain syndrome of suspected cardiac origin (i.e. symptoms consistent with ACS) * 18+ year old male or female * Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* ST-segment Elevation MI (STEMI) * Clear non-ischemic cause for symptoms (e.g. trauma) * Hemodynamic instability on admission (e.g. BP\>220mmHg systolic & \>110mmHg diastolic, \<80mmHg systolic & \<40mmHg diastolic, HR\>160bpm) * Ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation that cannot be treated effectively * Atrial fibrillation * Thoracic metal implants * Pacemaker or internal defibrillator * Pregnancy (if after 20-week period)\* or lactation * Patient unable to lie down (i.e. supine position) or stay still on the examination bed * Patient unable to understand the informed consent process and/or has a poor understanding of English (e.g. English- speaking relative/translator not available) * Patient unable to comply with the requirements of the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity and specificity of MCGup to 3 month follow-upSensitivity and specificity for diagnosing ACS, focusing on rule-out, in chest pain patients with normal sinus rhythm

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of adverse events and typesup to 3 month follow-up
All-cause mortatility (divided into CV and non-CV causes) proportionthrough 1 week, 3 month follow-up
3.Change in sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing ACS, focusing on rule-out, in chest pain patients with normal sinus rhythm, according to low, intermediate and high PTP groupsup to 3 months follow-up
MACE post-presentation to the ED (rule-out of ACS divided into MCG vs reference standard (adjudicated ACS/non-ACS diagnoses))through 1 week, 3 month follow-up

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026