Skip to content

Intervention Trial to Reduce Mental Health Disparities in Latina Immigrant Women

ALMA: A Randomized Control Trial of an Intervention to Reduce Mental Health Disparities in Mexican Immigrant Women

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03545282
Enrollment
226
Registered
2018-06-04
Start date
2018-09-26
Completion date
2022-01-01
Last updated
2024-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Depression, Stress

Keywords

Mental Health, Minority Health, Latina

Brief summary

Latina immigrant women are particularly vulnerable to depression and anxiety due to the social and economic stressors they face, including high levels of poverty, low levels of education, family obligations, exposure to violence, and limited access to community resources. ALMA aims to prevent and reduce depression and anxiety among Latina immigrant women. Women attend 8 weekly sessions in a group format to teach and encourage women to use coping strategies to reduce depression and anxiety. The intervention aims to increase participants' social ties and the social support they receive from other Latina immigrant women. The program also helps decrease the stigma associated with mental health and connects women to mental health services when needed.

Detailed description

The proposed study aims to test the efficacy of the Amigas Latinas Motivando el Alma (ALMA) intervention in a randomized control trial. ALMA is an 8-week program offered in a group format to teach women new coping strategies and enhance their social ties and social support to prevent and reduce their depression and anxiety. Aim 1 of the proposed study is to refine the ALMA intervention and study procedures, using information learned from focus groups and cognitive interviews with Mexican immigrant women. Aim 2 is to determine the efficacy of the ALMA intervention to reduce depressive and anxiety symptoms using a randomized control study design. We will recruit women from community-based organizations serving Latino immigrants to participate in the program, which will be offered in community settings. We will assess process outcomes of recruitment, retention, fidelity, and participant satisfaction through observations and in-depth interviews with participants. We will assess the efficacy of the intervention by comparing changes in women's depressive and anxiety symptoms in the intervention and attention control groups at four time points (pre-intervention, post-intervention, 6 months, 9 months). Aim 3 is to assess the potential impact of the intervention on both individual (stigma, stress, coping strategies) and interpersonal (social support, social ties) factors, and whether the impact of the intervention is mediated by these factors. The research team includes investigators in psychology, medicine, social work and public health, as well as community-based organizations serving Latina immigrants. The study uses rigorous methods to test an innovative program that integrates both culturally relevant and evidenced-based strategies to address significant mental health disparities in a high-risk and underserved population. Findings will help inform future research and practice. Given the growth of the Latino population, identifying interventions that reduce mental health disparities among Mexican immigrant women can have a significant public health impact.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAmigas Latinas Motivando el Alma (ALMA)

In a series of 8 weekly sessions, the program uses a group format to teach and encourage women to use coping strategies to reduce depression and anxiety. Over the course of the eight ALMA sessions, 25 women are (1) engaged in activities to identify coping strategies they are currently using and encouraged to continue to use them; (2) introduced to new coping strategies (e.g. mindfulness techniques, increased social ties and social support); and, (3) provided resources for seeking additional help if needed. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the intervention was changed to online synchronous delivery via Zoom over 6 weekly sessions.

Sponsors

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The investigators and outcomes assessor will not have knowledge of the interventions assigned to individual participants.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* To be eligible for study participation, participants must be at least 18 years of age, female, speak Spanish, must self-identify as Latina, and have been born outside of the United States.

Exclusion criteria

* Participant screened for high levels of depressive symptoms (as indicated by a score of 20 or higher on the PHQ-9) which indicates severe symptoms. Participants with scores above 20 were referred to the licensed mental health counselor on the study team. If these women are not already receiving mental health treatment, they will be referred to mental health providers offering low-cost services in Spanish. The counselor will discuss participation in the program with the potential participants and make the final determination about their ability to participate based on the care they are currently receiving and the severity of their symptoms.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depressive SymptomsBaseline, 2 months after baseline (post-intervention for intervention group), 4 months after baseline, and 6 months after baseline. Outcomes reported at baseline, 2 and 4 months after baseline for both intervention and control groups.Frequency of depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 in the last two weeks. The PHQ-9 is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. Scores range from 0 to 27. In general, a total of 10 or above is suggestive of the presence of depression. Depression Severity: 0-4 none, 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, 20-27 severe. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Anxiety SymptomsBaseline, 2 months after baseline (post-intervention for intervention group), 4 months after baseline, and 6 months after baseline. Outcomes reported at baseline, 2 and 4 months after baseline for both intervention and control groups.Frequency of anxiety symptoms as measured by the General Anxiety Disorders 7 in the last two weeks. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) is a self-reported questionnaire for screening and severity measuring of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Scores range from 0 to 21. Scores ≥10. Anxiety Severity: 1-4 minimal symptoms, 5-9 mild symptoms, 10-14 moderate symptoms, 15-21 severe symptoms. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
StressBaseline, 2 months after baseline (post-intervention for intervention group), 4 months after baseline, and 6 months after baseline. Outcomes reported at baseline, 2 and 4 months after baseline for both intervention and control groups.Frequency of perceived stress in the last month. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a classic stress assessment instrument. Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Program SatisfactionAssessed in the intervention group at post-intervention follow-up, 2 months after baseline. In the control group, it was assessed post-intervention, 6 months after baseline.Survey items that ask participant about their level of satisfaction with the program. Response options of 1 - 5, with 5 indicating highest satisfaction (better outcome).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from two community-based organizations serving Latino immigrants over four waves between September 2018 - February 2021. Bilingual study team members and community organization staff recruited participants by promoting the study to clients via flyers, PowerPoint presentations, social media announcements and word of mouth.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ALMA Intervention Group
Amigas Latinas Motivando el Alma (ALMA). This group receives the intervention after baseline assessment. Amigas Latinas Motivando el Alma (ALMA): In a series of 8 weekly sessions, the program uses a group format to teach and encourage women to use coping strategies to reduce depression and anxiety. Over the course of the eight ALMA sessions, 25 women are (1) engaged in activities to identify coping strategies they are currently using and encouraged to continue to use them; (2) introduced to new coping strategies (e.g. mindfulness techniques, increased social ties and social support); and, (3) provided resources for seeking additional help if needed. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the intervention was changed to online synchronous delivery via Zoom over 6 weekly sessions.
111
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control Group
Amigas Latinas Motivando el Alma (ALMA). This group receives the intervention five months after the baseline assessment (after the post-intervention, and 3 month assessments have been completed). Amigas Latinas Motivando el Alma (ALMA): In a series of 8 weekly sessions, the program uses a group format to teach and encourage women to use coping strategies to reduce depression and anxiety. Over the course of the eight ALMA sessions, 25 women are (1) engaged in activities to identify coping strategies they are currently using and encouraged to continue to use them; (2) introduced to new coping strategies (e.g. mindfulness techniques, increased social ties and social support); and, (3) provided resources for seeking additional help if needed. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the intervention was changed to online synchronous delivery via Zoom over 6 weekly sessions.
115
Total226

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1510
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupTotalALMA Intervention Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
113 Participants220 Participants107 Participants
Age, Continuous39.09 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.03
40.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
41.23 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04
Anxiety symptoms, categorical
Mild (5-9)
46 Participants92 Participants46 Participants
Anxiety symptoms, categorical
Moderate (10-14)
21 Participants40 Participants19 Participants
Anxiety symptoms, categorical
None (0-4)
37 Participants76 Participants39 Participants
Anxiety symptoms, categorical
Severe (15-21)
11 Participants18 Participants7 Participants
Anxiety symptoms, continuous7.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
6.87 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
6.67 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
Depressive symptoms, categorical
Mild (5-9)
39 Participants80 Participants41 Participants
Depressive symptoms, categorical
Moderate (10-14)
20 Participants35 Participants15 Participants
Depressive symptoms, categorical
Moderate to Severe (15-27)
9 Participants22 Participants13 Participants
Depressive symptoms, categorical
None (0-4)
47 Participants89 Participants42 Participants
Depressive symptoms, continuous6.66 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
6.86 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
7.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
Education, categorical
High school degree or higher
83 Participants150 Participants67 Participants
Education, categorical
Less than high school degree
32 Participants76 Participants44 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
115 Participants226 Participants111 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Immigration status, categorical
Current visa/ permission
37 Participants61 Participants24 Participants
Immigration status, categorical
Entry and/or stay without permission
59 Participants132 Participants73 Participants
Immigration status, categorical
Preferred not to answer
19 Participants33 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bolivia
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ecuador
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
El Salvador
5 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Guatemala
10 Participants15 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Honduras
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
89 Participants185 Participants96 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Peru
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Venezuela
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
115 Participants226 Participants111 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1110 / 115
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1110 / 115
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1110 / 115

Outcome results

Primary

Anxiety Symptoms

Frequency of anxiety symptoms as measured by the General Anxiety Disorders 7 in the last two weeks. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) is a self-reported questionnaire for screening and severity measuring of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Scores range from 0 to 21. Scores ≥10. Anxiety Severity: 1-4 minimal symptoms, 5-9 mild symptoms, 10-14 moderate symptoms, 15-21 severe symptoms. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 months after baseline (post-intervention for intervention group), 4 months after baseline, and 6 months after baseline. Outcomes reported at baseline, 2 and 4 months after baseline for both intervention and control groups.

Population: In the intervention group: 12 participants were lost to follow-up at 2-month post-intervention time point, and 17 were not able to be contacted at the 4 month follow-up time point. In the control group: 15 participants were lost to follow-up at 2-month post intervention time point, and 12 were not able to be contacted at 4 month follow-up time point. Reasons were that they could not be contacted or declined to complete the survey.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
ALMA Intervention GroupAnxiety SymptomsBaseline6.71 score on a scale
ALMA Intervention GroupAnxiety SymptomsTwo-month follow-up4.09 score on a scale
ALMA Intervention GroupAnxiety SymptomsFour-month follow-up4.30 score on a scale
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupAnxiety SymptomsBaseline7.02 score on a scale
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupAnxiety SymptomsTwo-month follow-up5.56 score on a scale
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupAnxiety SymptomsFour-month follow-up5.35 score on a scale
Primary

Depressive Symptoms

Frequency of depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 in the last two weeks. The PHQ-9 is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. Scores range from 0 to 27. In general, a total of 10 or above is suggestive of the presence of depression. Depression Severity: 0-4 none, 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, 20-27 severe. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 months after baseline (post-intervention for intervention group), 4 months after baseline, and 6 months after baseline. Outcomes reported at baseline, 2 and 4 months after baseline for both intervention and control groups.

Population: In the intervention group: 12 participants were lost to follow-up at 2-month post-intervention time point, and 17 were not able to be contacted at the 4 month follow-up time point. In the control group: 15 participants were lost to follow-up at 2-month post intervention time point, and 12 were not able to be contacted at 4 month follow-up time point. Reasons were that they could not be contacted or declined to complete the survey.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
ALMA Intervention GroupDepressive SymptomsBaseline7.01 score on a scale
ALMA Intervention GroupDepressive SymptomsTwo-month follow-up4.96 score on a scale
ALMA Intervention GroupDepressive SymptomsFour-month follow-up5.19 score on a scale
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupDepressive SymptomsBaseline6.61 score on a scale
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupDepressive SymptomsTwo-month follow-up6.39 score on a scale
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupDepressive SymptomsFour-month follow-up6.31 score on a scale
Secondary

Stress

Frequency of perceived stress in the last month. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a classic stress assessment instrument. Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline, 2 months after baseline (post-intervention for intervention group), 4 months after baseline, and 6 months after baseline. Outcomes reported at baseline, 2 and 4 months after baseline for both intervention and control groups.

Population: In the intervention group: 12 participants were lost to follow-up at 2-month post-intervention time point, and 17 were not able to be contacted at the 4 month follow-up time point. In the control group: 15 participants were lost to follow-up at 2-month post intervention time point, and 12 were not able to be contacted at 4 month follow-up time point. Reasons were that they could not be contacted or declined to complete the survey.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ALMA Intervention GroupStressBaseline6.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
ALMA Intervention GroupStressTwo month follow-up5.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
ALMA Intervention GroupStressFour month follow-up5.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupStressBaseline6.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupStressTwo month follow-up5.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupStressFour month follow-up5.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Other Pre-specified

Program Satisfaction

Survey items that ask participant about their level of satisfaction with the program. Response options of 1 - 5, with 5 indicating highest satisfaction (better outcome).

Time frame: Assessed in the intervention group at post-intervention follow-up, 2 months after baseline. In the control group, it was assessed post-intervention, 6 months after baseline.

Population: In the intervention group: 14 participants were either lost to follow-up at two month time point or did not attend any sessions and therefore were not asked these questions. In the control group: 39 participants were either lost to follow-up at two month time point or did not attend any sessions and therefore were not asked the questions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ALMA Intervention GroupProgram SatisfactionWould recommend program4.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.02
ALMA Intervention GroupProgram SatisfactionProgram was relevant4.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05
ALMA Intervention GroupProgram SatisfactionEnjoyed ALMA program4.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.03
ALMA Intervention GroupProgram SatisfactionThe program helped improve my mental health4.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.04
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupProgram SatisfactionThe program helped improve my mental health4.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.08
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupProgram SatisfactionWould recommend program4.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupProgram SatisfactionEnjoyed ALMA program4.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.06
ALMA Delayed Intervention Control GroupProgram SatisfactionProgram was relevant4.78 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.05

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026