Ventilation Therapy; Complications
Conditions
Keywords
Airway, extraglottic, simulation, laryngeal mask
Brief summary
Comparison of time to ventilation based on the chest rising of the Airway Simulator between the iLTS-D and LMA Fastrach
Detailed description
Prior to the study every participant obtained a standardized instruction of each device. In the proposed clinical trial the primary study objective will be to determine whether there is a difference in time to ventilation via endotracheal tube (seconds) for the novel iLTS-D compared to the LMA Fastrach. Time to Ventilation will be defined from when the tip of the extraglottic airway device passed the incisors to the point until confirmation the first chest rise of the high fidelity simulator (Laerdal SimMan). Additionally, two time points before final tracheal placement will evaluated: time to place the EGA and time to ventilate with the EGA after introducing the device into the oral cavity.
Interventions
Time to ventilation (ET) based of insert the iLTS until the chest rise of the simulator in seconds
Time to ventilation (ET) based of insert the Fastrach until the chest rise of the simulator in seconds
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Medical students * Present written informed consent of the research participant
Exclusion criteria
• inability to consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to ventilation via endotracheal tube | 0 to 300 seconds | time to ventilation will defined from when the Endotracheal tube insert into the extraglottic airway device until the first chest rise |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to ventilation via extraglottic airway device | 0 to 300 seconds | time to ventilation will defined from when the device tip passed the incisors to the point until the first chest rise |
| Intubation attempts | 0 to 300 seconds | Numbers of successful intubation attempts (1-5 attempts) |
| Ease of Insertion | 0 to 420 seconds | Subjective Grading of the insertion process (Lickert Scale from 1 very easy to 5 very difficult) |
Countries
Germany