Skip to content

Improving Student Mental Health: Adaptive School-based Implementation of CBT

Improving Student Mental Health: Adaptive School-based Implementation of CBT

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03541317
Enrollment
1329
Registered
2018-05-30
Start date
2018-07-19
Completion date
2020-05-15
Last updated
2022-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Depression

Keywords

Adaptive implementation, Coaching, Facilitation, School mental health, Implementation intervention

Brief summary

The overarching goal of this study is to improve the delivery of an established, evidence-based intervention (cognitive-behavioral therapy-CBT) in Michigan schools through different implementation strategies designed to better educate school professionals. Specifically, the study will assist the ongoing Transforming Research into Action to Improve the Lives of Students (TRAILS) Program by evaluating different ways to educate school professionals (SPs) to improve their delivery of CBT to high school students and ultimately improve student mental health outcomes in the state of Michigan. The three educational approaches are Replicating Effective Programs (REP), Coaching, and Facilitation.

Detailed description

This study seeks to develop an effective and efficient sequence of implementation strategies for encouraging delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) by school professionals in high schools across Michigan. In the run-in phase, all schools will receive support and training from REP for three months. After three months, schools will be randomized to either (1) continue with REP; or (1) augment REP with a minimum of 12 weeks of coaching. Eight weeks after this first randomization, schools will be evaluated to determine whether they might also benefit from an augmentation of their current strategy with Facilitation. Schools that could benefit from Facilitation (defined as delivering 3 or more CBT modules to less than 10 students or reporting 3 or more organizational barriers to delivering CBT) will be re-randomized to either (1) continue with their current strategy (REP or REP + Coaching); or (2) have their current strategy augmented with Facilitation. All implementation support will be discontinued 12 months after first randomization; outcomes will be assessed through 18 months after study start. This results in four sequences of implementation strategies: REP only; REP + Facilitation for those who did not adequately respond initially to REP alone; REP + Coaching; and REP + Coaching + Facilitation for those who did not adequately respond initially to REP + Coaching.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALStage 1 Strategy: REP

Schools will receive a daylong didactic training covering core elements of CBT and proper screening and identification of students; training to help SPs identify eligible students; a package that includes tools to deploy CBT; and ongoing technical assistance in CBT implementation.

BEHAVIORALStage 1 Strategy: REP + Coaching

Schools will receive a daylong didactic training covering core elements of CBT and proper screening and identification of students; training to help SPs identify eligible students; a package that includes tools to deploy CBT; ongoing technical assistance in CBT implementation; and weekly visits from a CBT expert or Coach, for a minimum of 12 weeks.

BEHAVIORALStage 2 Strategy: Augment with Facilitation

In addition to first-line treatment (REP or REP + Coaching), schools will also receive support from a Facilitator who is a member of the study team and has expertise in CBT, implementation methods, and use of EBPs in schools will support SPs in strategic thinking and leadership skills to address organizational barriers.

BEHAVIORALStage 2 Strategy: No augmentation

Schools will continue to receive their first-line treatment (REP or REP + Coaching); no additional support will be offered.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Michigan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

School Administrators Inclusion Criteria: * Working at a school that is located within a 2-hour drive of a TRAILS coach * Employed at a Michigan high school full or part time * Able to read and understand English

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to provide informed consent for participation in the study activities School Professional Inclusion Criteria: * Working at a school that is located within a 2-hour drive of a TRAILS coach * Employed at a Michigan high school full or part time * Have a background in clinical school social work, counseling, psychology, or similar area * Able to read and understand English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of CBT Sessions Delivered by School Professionals to Students After 18 MonthsBaseline to 18-monthsSchool professionals include counselors, social workers, and trained mental health providers working within the school. The primary aim is a comparison of schools offered the REP only intervention (the least intensive strategy) versus schools offered the adaptive implementation strategy involving REP, Coaching, and Facilitation (the most intensive strategy).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Brief Individual CBT Sessions18 monthsThe sum of the average number of brief individual CBT sessions (\<15 min.) delivered to students by SPs over all four post-randomization phases occurring during Stages 1 and 2.
Number of Full Individual CBT Sessions18 MonthsThe sum of the average number of full individual CBT sessions (≥15 min.) delivered to students by SPs over all four post-randomization phases occurring during Stages 1 and 2.
Number of Group CBT Sessions18 MonthsThe sum of the average number of group CBT sessions delivered to students by SPs over all four post-randomization phases occurring during Stages 1 and 2.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Of the 1329 consented, listed in registration: there were 103 School administrators (for 94 schools), 978 Students were enrolled into the study, 227 school professionals from 115 schools were enrolled/consented; 21 coaches were also consented. Because primary and secondary outcome measures are all based on data collected from school professionals, only they are included in participant flow, baseline characteristics, outcome measures.

Pre-assignment details

Pre-randomization, 21 schools and a total of 58 school professionals declined or did not meet eligibility and were dropped. Stage 1 Randomization: 94 schools (employing 169 school professionals (SPs)) were enrolled in the sequentially-randomized trial. Stage 2 Randomization: All 83 schools (employing 154 SPs) identified as potentially benefitting from augmentation with Facilitation (i.e., schools that did not respond sufficiently following Stage 1 strategy) were re-randomized at Stage 2.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Stage 1 Strategy: REP:
Stage 1 Strategy: REP. This includes all three arms listed in Participant Flow as not receiving Coaching
81
Stage 1 Strategy: REP:
Stage 1 Strategy: REP. This includes all three arms listed in Participant Flow as not receiving Coaching
47
Stage 1 Strategy: REP + Coaching
Stage 1 Strategy: REP + Coaching This includes all three arms listed in Participant Flow as receiving Coaching.
88
Stage 1 Strategy: REP + Coaching
Stage 1 Strategy: REP + Coaching This includes all three arms listed in Participant Flow as receiving Coaching.
47
Total263

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Stage 2 of the ImplementationWithdrawal by Subject100000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalStage 1 Strategy: REP:Stage 1 Strategy: REP + Coaching
Age, Customized
> 18 years of age
169 Participants81 Participants88 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
non-white
11 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
unknown
7 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
white
151 Participants71 Participants80 Participants
Rural schools (vs urban) (Binary proportion).56 proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
.55 proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
.57 proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
School level average School Professional tenure7.56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.96
7.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.03
7.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.94
School level Proportion of School Professionals with graduate degree.90 Proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.26
.89 Proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.28
.91 Proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.24
Schools with > 500 students (vs. ≤ 500 students), Binary Proportion0.65 proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48
0.66 proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48
0.64 proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.49
Schools with ≥ 50% of students on free/reduced cost lunch.36 proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.48
0.36 proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.49
.36 proportion
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.49
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
143 Participants69 Participants74 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
20 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown
6 Participants4 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of CBT Sessions Delivered by School Professionals to Students After 18 Months

School professionals include counselors, social workers, and trained mental health providers working within the school. The primary aim is a comparison of schools offered the REP only intervention (the least intensive strategy) versus schools offered the adaptive implementation strategy involving REP, Coaching, and Facilitation (the most intensive strategy).

Time frame: Baseline to 18-months

Population: The primary outcome measure pertains to delivery of CBT by school professionals only, and thus the number analyzed reflects data categorized by number of school professionals that had REP only vs. most intensive intervention: REP, Coaching and Facilitation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group 1: REP OnlyNumber of CBT Sessions Delivered by School Professionals to Students After 18 Months121.1 number of CBT sessions
Group 2: REP + Coaching, Responders Continue and REP + Coaching With FacilitationNumber of CBT Sessions Delivered by School Professionals to Students After 18 Months111.4 number of CBT sessions
p-value: 0.6395% CI: [-30.03, 49.4]weighted least squares regression
Secondary

Number of Brief Individual CBT Sessions

The sum of the average number of brief individual CBT sessions (\<15 min.) delivered to students by SPs over all four post-randomization phases occurring during Stages 1 and 2.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group 1: REP OnlyNumber of Brief Individual CBT Sessions55.9 Number of brief sessions
Group 2: REP + Coaching, Responders Continue and REP + Coaching With FacilitationNumber of Brief Individual CBT Sessions52.1 Number of brief sessions
p-value: 0.7295% CI: [-16.88, 24.44]weighted least squares regression
Secondary

Number of Full Individual CBT Sessions

The sum of the average number of full individual CBT sessions (≥15 min.) delivered to students by SPs over all four post-randomization phases occurring during Stages 1 and 2.

Time frame: 18 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group 1: REP OnlyNumber of Full Individual CBT Sessions49.5 full sessions
Group 2: REP + Coaching, Responders Continue and REP + Coaching With FacilitationNumber of Full Individual CBT Sessions41.7 full sessions
p-value: 0.4695% CI: [-13.2, 28.91]Weighted Least Squares Regression
Secondary

Number of Group CBT Sessions

The sum of the average number of group CBT sessions delivered to students by SPs over all four post-randomization phases occurring during Stages 1 and 2.

Time frame: 18 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group 1: REP OnlyNumber of Group CBT Sessions16.8 group sessions
Group 2: REP + Coaching, Responders Continue and REP + Coaching With FacilitationNumber of Group CBT Sessions17.5 group sessions
Comparison: A test of the null hypothesis that there is no difference between these two strategies on the sum of the average number of group CBT sessions delivered to students by SPs over the four post-randomization phase occurring during Stages 1 and 2.p-value: 0.8795% CI: [-8.49, 7.16]Weighted Least Squares Regression

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026