Skip to content

Trigger Point Dry Needling vs Trigger Point Dry Needling With Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation

Trigger Point Dry Needling vs Trigger Point Dry Needling With Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Sub-acute and Chronic Low Back Pain in a Military Population: A Randomized Crossover Design

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03539588
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-05-29
Start date
2017-04-12
Completion date
2017-11-13
Last updated
2018-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sub-acute and Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

dry needling, electrical stimulation, E-Stim, LBP, low back pain, trigger point, chronic, subacute

Brief summary

trigger point dry needling with intramuscular electrical stimulation vs trigger point dry needling

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if trigger point dry needling with intramuscular electrical stimulation is more effective in decreasing pain and disability in individuals with sub-acute and chronic low back pain (LBP) than with trigger point dry needling alone. The investigators are using a within subjects randomized crossover study that will recruit 30 active duty military personnel or beneficiaries from William Beaumont Army Medical Center and all associated clinics. The investigators hypothesize that individuals with LBP will exhibit larger improvements in pain and disability when receiving trigger point dry needling with intramuscular electrical stimulation than when receiving trigger point dry needling alone.

Interventions

placement of the dry needle into the muscle tissue to elicit a local twitch response. Only MYOTECH dry needles and ESTIM II dual channel stimulator will be used in this study. However we are not studying the equipment.

DEVICEElectrical Stimulation

uses the dry needles as nodes to stimulate muscular contraction. Only MYOTECH dry needles and ESTIM II dual channel stimulator will be used in this study. However we are not studying the equipment.

Sponsors

William Beaumont Army Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Currently experience low back pain for greater than 4 weeks (Low back pain defined as pain below the T12th vertebrae with or without radiation) Military or DOD Beneficiary (any branch; 18-65 years of age)

Exclusion criteria

* Structural Deformity (ankylosing Spondylitis, Scoliosis) * Has any other Orthopedic condition that may keep subject from performing Low - Back Exercises * Tumors * Spinal infection or local infection * Pregnancy-All female subjects will be given either a blood serum or urine pregnancy test. * Spinal cord compression or Cauda Equina Syndrome * Subject with the inability to keep appointments * Has History of prior surgery * Has received Dry Needling or Acupuncture in the last 6 months * History of bleeding disorders * High anti-coagulant use * History of immune suppression

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Pain Rating Scale to assess changeBaseline and before and after each treatment session, duration per subject is approximately 3 weeksan 11 point scale on which the participant will grade their pain

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026