Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate Abicipar Pegol for Safety and Treatment Effect in Participants With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

Evaluation of Abicipar Pegol in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03539549
Enrollment
124
Registered
2018-05-29
Start date
2018-05-25
Completion date
2019-02-27
Last updated
2020-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular Degeneration

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate abicipar pegol for safety and treatment effects in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Interventions

Abicipar pegol 2 mg administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection on Day 1 and Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female participants, 50 years of age or older at the time of informed consent * Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) ≤ 78 and ≥ 24 letters (20/32 to 20/320 Snellen equivalents, respectively) at Screening and at Baseline (Day 1, prior to treatment) visits in the study eye * BCVA of 34 letters (Snellen equivalent 20/200) or better at Baseline (Day 1, prior to treatment) in the non-study eye

Exclusion criteria

* Active periocular, ocular, or intraocular infection at baseline (Day 1) (either eye) * Previous or concurrent macular laser treatment (study eye) * Cataract or refractive surgery within 3 months prior to baseline (study eye)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Stable VisionBaseline (Day 1) to Week 28Stable vision was defined as a loss of fewer than 15 letters in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) compared to baseline. BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The study eye was defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in the Study EyeBaseline (Day 1) to Week 28CRT was assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.
Percentage of Participants With Loss of 15 or Less EDTRS Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study EyeBaseline (Day 1) to Week 28BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The study eye was defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.
Change Form Baseline in BCVA in the Study EyeBaseline (Day 1) to Week 28BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The study eye was defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.
Percentage of Participants With a Gain of 15 or More ETDRS Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study EyeBaseline (Day 1), Week 28BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The study eye was defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.

Other

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Full Ophthalmic Exam Findings [i.e. Slit Lamp Exam, Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measurements, Funduscopic Exam]Baseline to Week 28
Changes From Baseline in General Physical Condition as Measured Through General Physical ExamBaseline to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure, Pulse Rate, ECG)Baseline to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Clinically Relevant Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, Urinalysis)Baseline to Week 28
Percentage of Participants With Anti-abicipar Antibodies Measured in SerumBaseline to Week 28

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 124 participants were enrolled in the study. Out of 124, one participant was not treated with study drug and was subsequently discontinued from the study. The participant was not included in the Safety Population or analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Abicipar Pegol 2 mg
Abicipar pegol 2 mg administered to the study eye by intravitreal injection on Day 1 and Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24.
123
Total123

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyProgressive Disease1
Overall StudyReason not Specified1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAbicipar Pegol 2 mg
Age, Continuous78.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.21
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)62.0 letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.19
Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)353.1 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 94.05
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
119 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
119 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 123
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Stable Vision

Stable vision was defined as a loss of fewer than 15 letters in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) compared to baseline. BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The study eye was defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 administration of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Abicipar Pegol 2 mgPercentage of Participants With Stable Vision97.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change Form Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye

BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The study eye was defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 administration of study treatment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants with data available for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abicipar Pegol 2 mgChange Form Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye3.6 lettersStandard Deviation 7.19
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in the Study Eye

CRT was assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), a non-invasive diagnostic system providing high-resolution imaging sections of the retina. SD-OCT was performed in the study eye after pupil dilation. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 administration of study treatment. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at the given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Abicipar Pegol 2 mgChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) in the Study Eye-82.5 micronsStandard Deviation 102.13
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Gain of 15 or More ETDRS Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye

BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The study eye was defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 28

Population: Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 administration of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Abicipar Pegol 2 mgPercentage of Participants With a Gain of 15 or More ETDRS Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye9.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Loss of 15 or Less EDTRS Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye

BCVA was measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly using the ETDRS Scale (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The study eye was defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes met the entry criteria, the eye with the worse BCVA at baseline (Day 1) was selected as the study eye. If both eyes had same BCVA values at baseline (Day 1), then the participant had to select their non-dominant eye for treatment, or else the right eye was selected as the study eye.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 28

Population: Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 administration of study treatment. Overall number of participants analyzed are the participants with data available for analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Abicipar Pegol 2 mgPercentage of Participants With Loss of 15 or Less EDTRS Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye0.9 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Changes From Baseline in General Physical Condition as Measured Through General Physical Exam

Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Anti-abicipar Antibodies Measured in Serum

Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Clinically Relevant Laboratory Values (Serum Chemistry, Hematology, Urinalysis)

Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Full Ophthalmic Exam Findings [i.e. Slit Lamp Exam, Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measurements, Funduscopic Exam]

Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure, Pulse Rate, ECG)

Time frame: Baseline to Week 28

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026